Vaccines, do they work or are they ineffective?

Risk verses reward, is the Juice worth the Squeeze

Hi Everyone! This article has been revised. This post will remain as is, with the exception of these first few sentences. The revised version is up now with tons more exciting new points, arguments pro and con, facts, references, etc. on the subject of the immune system and vaccines.

The New article is simply called “The Immune System”. Thank you

One of the best books I ever read (on my top 3 list) was Bill Bryson’s A Short History of Nearly Everything. Among so many other wonderful Science based things the nearly 500 page book speaks to, he reminded us just how often, over the thousands of years of recorded history – we got stuff wrong, scientists got stuff wrong.

From Geology, chemistry, physics, Medicine, epidemiology, bio-engineering, agriculture, Pathology, Genetics, Immunology, Anthropology, Archaeology, Biology, Astrophysics, Astronomy, Botany, Zoology, Neuroscience, Psychology, Mathematics, Aeronautical, Computer Science, Statistics, Earth, Ocean & Atmospheric Science, and on and on – there were and are countless OOPs moments.

 Many of these oops, these trials fraught with errors moments, were big mess-ups, huge miscalculations etc. some were minor and easily retracted and corrected. Some ideas and theories were scrapped altogether (back to the drawing board type stuff) while others that were suspect or truly in error managed to hang around, managed to become legitimate narratives over the years, decades and even centuries in some instances.

Some of what we got wrong in science or that took a long time to be corrected, scrapped or better understood was of little consequence, like how much does the planet earth weight, or how do black holes do what they do. Many times things we call theories, some in science act as if they are actual things that factually happened. The big bang theory is one example where the telling of it, the math and methodologies etc. is as if it’s not a theory but an actual occurrence some 13.7 billion years ago (give or take a day).

I personally, with my research, have seen these errors, or as I like to call them, scientific assumptions, not get rectified or scraped from the science journals of record but instead calcify as doctrine, as absolutes – written in stone.

One example is proteins and amino acids, and as they relate to nitrogen fixing. 100 years ago science had it that we need certain dietary amino acids because we can’t synthesize them on our own. One issue was our (humans) inability to convert atmospheric Nitrogen to a more user friendly N3.

Fast forward 85 years later and science, with vastly superior technology, has shown that humans can in fact “fix” nitrogen, we have always been able to do this. Science has also learned that humans can synthesize essential amino acids like Leucine, Lysine, threonine etc.

But so very very few are aware of this. The global narrative still has it that we need to eat beef, soy or eggs to get proteins, to get these essential amino acids – we do not. Even ChatGPT doesn’t know we can make our own Leucine…See my other article for details and links (or ask for link in the comments).

Science is not static

To be locked into a way of thinking just because it's been around for decades or centuries, is not the best way to do science, unless you want or need that particular discipline of science to be stagnant (which nobody wants).

One has to yield to other ideas, if only for a minute, if we are to advance in any field. Sometimes we have to suspend what we know, or what we thought we know/knew, put a pin in it, just temporarily perhaps, to have the best chance of growing in our understanding of something.

One should allow for a truly broad understanding of how things work, even if/when it goes against time honored dogma, paradigms and narratives. Science is not static. What can get in the way many times, is, as we saw with the Edison/Tesla feuds, ego, pride and money. These things can get in the way of advancing new ideas, or scraping bad ideas or ideas that are not as effective or efficient as the latest idea.

I say all of this quasi preamble if you will, not as a disclaimer, not as an excuse to say we can fly unaided, the earth is flat, or humans can exist without oxygen etc. - and now you will believe me because “science makes mistakes all the time…”.

This introduction is borne out of the many many times someone, doctor, scientist or layperson, has said to me something to the effect of “You mean my years of medical training, more years of continuing education, and the fact that I literally delivered a talk on vaccines at a major conference just this morning – is for naught?” Said one doctor to me in a vaccine conversation. Or “So everyone else in the world is dumb and you, a random person on social media is right…ok lol” Said a non science person to me in a conversation about amino acids. I get this a lot.

This topic on vaccines is one I have to treat with the greatest of care. It is a most explosive issue in the real world, the media world, in politics and in social media venues. There rarely is any middle ground – you are either pro vax or anti vax, and those approaches have also taken up political sides.

My article however is worse. It is not about taking or not taking a vaccine but instead, vaccines simply don’t work, have never worked and have never been proven to work, proven on a molecular level.

What does “molecular level” mean? I will explain in hyper detail here but that doesn’t matter – the mere mention that vaccines don’t work, have never worked – will get your head chopped off, will have you banned from the universe, sent to Siberia to live out your days in isolation like so many lepers.

Twitter banned the link to the article, this article. They set in motion a global social media algorithm that blocks the link from even being posted, tweeted. And this for Facebook as well. I wasn’t even on face book, but somehow it can’t be posted there as well.

It’s science people, calm down. You don’t have to agree with it, or believe it, but to shut down the idea that vaccines just might not have never ever worked is not how real science is done, or should be done.

Twitter actually said this:

Twitter thought saying and showing vaccines don’t work was/is “harmful”.

While many complain about being harmed by vaccines, twitter will allow for millions to have at it, back on forth on the dangers of vaccines, but to claim they don’t work – then shutdown, censoring, is swift and widespread. In fairness, twitter doesn’t have a science staff to see and realize that the article actually makes a ton of salient points, ones that many scientists, guns to their heads, would have to agree with.

In the estimation of moi, it does way more harm to people by keeping this information from them. The stuff written in the following pages is stuff that should be front and center on all news platforms – if you really care about the masses, if you really want to protect the global public. Most things in life, from finance to sports, gambling, higher education (student loans) and taking prescription drugs is about Risk versus Reward – is the Juice worth the squeeze. If we think there is some harm in these vaccines yet of no benefit, that’s kind of a big deal and one worthy of many discussions.

So, let’s begin (I suggest you cut and paste this for your desktop files before it is removed from this platform as well…). I can only play cat and mouse with changing the link for so long…

VACCINES DON’T WORK

No vaccine, throughout the course of medical science history, has ever been molecularly proven to work, to be effective, to prevent you from getting the thing the vaccine was created for.

I should add that I don’t do conspiracy theories, I just do science (and history). As well, I do not do politics, just science. I just do science. So try, make an effort, to come at me differently, when I tell and show you that vaccines do not work, won’t work, and can’t work. It is an impossibility of physics, chemistry and biology for a preventive drug (vaccine) to work.

During this latest Covid pandemic someone/anyone, Jason Kendrik, was asked, “So now that you have been fully vaccinated and twice boosted, are you now immune to Sars Covid?” The person replied “Yes I am.” A follow up question was simply – “How do you know?” to which the person replied “because they said I was…”. This prompted a 3rd question to the innocent bloke – “Who said you were?”

There was a pause and then Jason replied, “The News said so, the Science Data said so.” Sarcasm began to seep in and the person asking the questions to Kendrick said – “Were you on the news, did the science do the study on you personally?”

Juxtaposition: If a cancer patient, one who had a large tumor and was undergoing all manner of procedures (surgery, chemo etc.) to remove the tumor, was asked the same question about the efficacy, effectiveness of said methodologies – would their answer be the same or similar as Mr. Kendrick’s, the vaccinated person?

Would a cancer patient, one with a large tumor, when asked, did the efforts to remove the tumor and rid your body of cancerous, rogue cells, succeed, would they reply, ‘yes, because the News said so, the science data (collective data from thousands of other cancer patients) said so’?

No, a cancer patient would refer solely, strictly, to his personal medical report/data/findings/results etc.

Both are life or death dynamics, covid has killed millions, cancer has killed millions. But never in the history of cancer patients was the diagnosis “generic”. Instead, each cancer patient has a team of doctors studying the cancerous cells of that particular person and or the tumor if needed. Each patient, is kept abreast of the progress based not on some other patient(s) but on his/her latest diagnosis, one based on a personalized study of the insides of the individual patient.

Many are wont to dismiss this type of comparison, this perhaps awkward correlation, but it cannot be dismissed. If anyone wants to know if they are now “immune” to some virus, bacteria, pathogen, germ, etc., due to being vaccinated, the only way to determine this is not from CNN, FOX, ABC/CBS/NBC or your local news broadcast or internet news feeds, but instead a personal testing by your doctor or nurse to see if you now, post vaccinated/boosted, have the proper and needed defense mechanisms set in place – B and T cells, antibodies, etc.

But how many of us have done this? How many humans got a post vax test for B/T cells, antibodies etc.? I do know that the FDA recommends that Americans don’t get a personalized test because they feel we might get the wrong test done or our doctors and medical staff won’t be able to properly analyze and interpret the results.

Yes, there are wrong tests and right tests out there – and again, the FDA feels the medical community at large is either not aware of this or don’t have access to the proper tests. And again, the FDA feels there will be some confusion in interpreting test results regardless.

Here is part of the problem, or issue that could be a problem. When the pandemic first began we all were getting tested for covid. If you did have covid, there would be some degree of immune response in the way of antibodies (levels of, Titer), B and T cells etc. – or, the body made quick work of the virus and your blood showed no signs of the virus, just like getting a cold or the flu, once you were done, you were done and no signs exist that you had the flu.

Those tests early on were looking for antibodies to the corona virus protein called “N” for nucleocapsid. Those vaccinated, a proper test would, should, be looking for Antibodies related to what was in the vaccines and the spike protein (A spike protein sits on the surface of viruses and does the interlocking with your cells).

The FDA feels you might see the “wrong” immune response and then you could assume you are protected thus when you aren’t and then be less cautious and more prone to go out among the infected feeling safe. Or you might see zero antibodies and not realize they have not developed yet post vaccination. Or you were taking some medications (prescription or over the counter) that could interfere with immune responses to the vaccine and you not knowing this, would think the vaccine itself doesn’t work – or countless other things…

If this all seems confusing, well, even the FDA is confused, or not exactly sure about all this. Actually, a year into the pandemic I began to get a sense that no one in the medical science community (biologists, chemists, virologists, doctors, immunologists, epidemiologists, the CDC/FDA/NIH/WHO etc.), has a good understanding of the body, viruses, vaccines – and most critically, the immune system.

 It’s like here it is 2021/22/23 and viruses, pandemics, vaccines, are all new to us and “more work needs to be done to understand all this”. I have actually seen a virologist admit they got some things wrong. He tweeted: ‘it’s healthy to admit we don’t understand Covid and to have scientific disagreements about what we see and what it means…’.

Another virologist said, in the middle of this pandemic, that she read a study that suggests that people’s immune systems remember COVID-19 for months after recovery. Oh really? The virologist, name withheld, said “new studies showed that natural infection induced a strong response, and these studies now show that the responses last,” says Dr. ____________ at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology. “We are hopeful that a similar pattern of responses lasting over time will also emerge for the vaccine-induced responses.” This was in March of 2021.

So, an immunologist, did not know that a natural viral infection would one, trigger an immune response, and two, have a lasting effect of any length. Hmmm

Again, It’s almost like this is the first pandemic humans have ever experienced and as the masses look to the science community for answers the confusion gets amped up 20 notches. That we have variants should not surprise scientists, doctors and especially epidemiologists – yet it did. How did they all not know that all microbes can and most times, will be, for better or worse, modified by the host organism?

Beyond the embarrassment that is the American medical system, the infrastructure that includes the FDA/CDC etc. this was not a time for our political and health leaders along with science and medical folk to not be on the same or at least similar pages.

The idea of post vax testing should have been sorted out right at the outset of the vaccine roll out. The FDA/CDC and those making and testing drugs should have provided the proper tests, provided the proper information on how to analyze, what to look for and how to have the proper discussion with those being tested. A decent hospital or lab would/should ask the person wanting to be tested if it was to confirm a prior infection (N-capsule protein) or vaccine-generated antibodies (Receptor Binding Domain region of spike protein).

Yet even today, 2023, there is not at all this homogeny of information regarding post vaccinating testing, testing to determine if you are now immune to covid as a result of being vaccinated.

As well, not all clinics, hospitals and medical centers have been given the proper tests – to make sure there is no issue with “the wrong tests being done”.

But here is the greater concern, the real issue and problem. No one knew what level of antibodies was enough to protect against covid. It’s not just about “having Antibodies” – it’s about knowing how much, how many, what level of antibodies is enough to provide protection from an antigen. Even where and when proper tests were done on post vaccinated humans, and those tests showed immune responses, no one, and perhaps still, knew what level of antibodies would be sufficient to protect against Sars Covid 19. Even Doctors have complained that there were no studies available yet to tell us how much antibodies would infer immunity (how much Ab titers would do the trick).

As one doctor put it “The fundamental problem is that we haven’t yet proven that the amount of antibodies produced correlates with protection from the virus.” And keep in mind everyone that these statements were after the vaccines were rolled out – which tells us all that the trials never knew this either. The vaccine makers never knew if their vaccines would trigger an immune response, one, and two, what level of antibodies would be needed to protect against the Corona virus.

What had happened was, the drug makers made a vaccine and just rolled it out. To quote someone in science; “Unfortunately, the types of studies needed to look for a correlation between antibody levels and immunity will take months to years to complete. In the meantime, we have to accept the unfortunate fact that we simply don’t have a test to reliably determine whether someone is truly protected from the virus or not.”

Fauci also said as much regarding how long it could take to determine for efficacy, though he said it while they were still working on the vaccines, prior to rollout. But post rollout, in 2021 one person said this: “It is not at all clear to me as a practicing academically affiliated MD that there is ANY reliable predictive data that correlates a test after COVID vaccination with “practical” immunity in real world situations.” In general many in the medical profession have complained that they haven’t seen any studies that provide strong evidence that a particular antibody level provides immunity.

And many will also remind you that looking for antibodies is one thing but equally if not more critical are the cells, the B and T cells. While the antibody test only measures the humoral (circulating) immune response and we have not as yet established or made a conclusive determination for effective levels the cellular immune response is key. Some say the tests to measure that immune response are too complex for clinical use. ??

Perhaps, what antibody levels would be necessary to trigger a cellular response? Did we know at least this at any point prior to vaccine rollout, or since? That would be a no.

But I digress, so few Americans even thought to have a Post Vax test done – they just trusted the science, trusted the media that relayed the science to us from the CDC/FDA.

And of course another question I ask is when, in the history of vaccines, did they ever have the masses do this post vax testing? Even with “trials”, historically, when did they show that the trial subjects (humans), now have the protective dynamics within their body’s and respective immune systems/responses set up due to the vaccine and now they can get the antigen (get naturally infected) yet not die from it?

An antigen is any substance that causes the body to make an immune response against that substance. Antigens include toxins, chemicals, bacteria, viruses, or other substances that come from outside the body.

From the days of that first smallpox/cowpox vaccine, the one that was tried out on a young boy, right up until the present covid vaccines, there has never been actual molecular proof that any person is now immune to the virus they took the vaccine for. What has been consistent is the public just took the science community’s word for it – based on one or ten or a million vaccinated not dying from the pathogen.

But is this really proof? With the young boy, 8-year-old James Phipps, that was given the very first (supposedly/allegedly) vaccine – all we had to go on was that the boy did not die once he was given the real virus. I am not saying that Dr Edward Jenner, the father of the first successful vaccine, made it all up, akin to the flat earthers or those who don’t believe we really landed on moon, but I am saying all he had to go on was the boy not dying.

This first vaccine that “worked” was over 200 years ago (1796 ish), an era when we had little to no true understandings of the body, its immune system, and to match, we had crude technology. Dr Jenner’s work was at least 100 years prior to our collective first true understandings of the immune system, Jenner’s vaccine was prior to our learning about and identifying say B and T lymphocytes.

To be sure, humans in and out of science have had ideas about sickness and diseases even thousands of years ago, and sought to develop preventive measures, including repeatedly getting bit by poisonous snakes as a way to “build up immunity”. I could also guess, or assume that Dr Jenner and his contemporaries might have been informed to some extent by the ideas of snake bites as a way to develop an immune response to – snake bites.

Humans have always had, along with remedies for what ails you, remedies for what might ail you in the future, aka preventive measures. Growing up I had always heard the old wives tale that if you wanted to rid yourself of hay fever go stand in a hay field or some area rich with pollen for half the day, take it all in, go through the extreme suffering, and then you will be fine, cured forever more.

We know that many regions of the world, have their unique set of pathogens and the locals are all immune to them (over decades, centuries, millennia) while us visitors need to take care not to drink the local water or eat the fresh fruits and veggies – not right away at least or cook them first. I always opt for the bottled water when traveling, water by known brands.

There is also the idea that by eating enough fruits and types of seafood (shellfish), we can develop an immunity to certain non-biological poisons, Arsenic, and even cyanide to a lesser extent.

As I alluded to, the snake tribes of Pakokku in Burma would tattoo themselves with a mixture of Black ink and snake venom (venom, not an anti-venom), so they could deal with inevitable snake bites later on in life.

The idea of being immune to or making oneself immune to pathogens, deadly microbes, toxins etc., and the subsequent vaccines – are founded in these perhaps ancient ideas of how to treat and or deal with exogenous things that can be deadly once inside you.

What all these immunity “protocols” real or imagined, have in common, is that they are speaking to real, live pathogens and toxins etc. They are using actual snake venom, or pollen, or are eating real apples and other foods that contain arsenic/cyanide etc.  As well, with Edward Jenner (smallpox/cowpox), he used an actual virus. As opposed to what we have in the modern vaccines.

But still, 5 thousand years ago, 200 years ago, today – we have not really proved these preventive measures actually worked. We have not really shown, proven, that if you take some form (modified, attenuated, simulated, mRNA, spike) of a pathogen, in small doses – it will create the proper and needed immune protection and now you can be exposed to the actual virus and nothing will happen to you, you won’t get sick, you won’t die.

I don’t care to really speak to the hedging of bets type selling point where science tells us “if you do come into contact with the pathogen, once vaccinated at least it won’t kill you and the suffering will be mild and not sustained”. We have all now seen that not to be the case at all with the tens of thousands of breakthrough deaths. Yes, at last count, which was almost a year ago 2022, tens of thousands fully vaxxed and boosted humans still got covid and died from covid.

I think they stopped using the word breakthrough. At first they said “rare breakthroughs” as if it were perhaps just 2 or 3 or even a dozen humans, but when it got to be hundreds and then thousands of vaxxed people dying still from covid, they nixed the rare thing as well the breakthrough word. In reality, they were not breakthroughs in the first place. A breakthrough would imply, or science, the world of pharmacology would imply that their drug/vaccine, created a defense and in some cases the virus broke through the defenses and killed the person.

The fact of the matter is, there were no defenses to begin with. The vaccines did not create an immune response to the covid virus that was rampant among us. And if you died or survived once infected – it was all due to your personal immune strength, alongside a medical staff to help with things.

And the added selling point of “you can no longer spread it”, well we saw that narrative also go up in flames. Then, the science leaders really got carried away when they said their vaccines would also cover the variants – and true to form, Vaxxed people died from the variants as well.

The CDC/FDA timeline narrative on Covid literally went as follows: At first it was “The Vaccine will keep you from getting covid”, then it evolved to “well at least you won’t get sick and die” and most recently, “Thousands of fully vaccinated people are dying, keep those masks on”. See original CDC covid banner (I only added text above and below it for my twitter use).

If just one fully vaxxed and boosted person in the world had died from covid, say General Colin Powell (RIP), we could perhaps call it an anomaly, or even a dozen people would be a curious rarity, an outlier type phenomenon.

But hundreds dying is not an anomaly, hundreds and certainly thousands and tens of thousands of vaxxed folk dying brings into question drug failure. Drugs fail more times than they succeed (and that’s normal if you know anything about the pharmaceutical world). 9 out of 10 drugs fail to get approved, and this is after, on average, 10 years of study and development with 5 or 6 of those years in trial phases. 90% drug failure in the world of pharmacology.

Call me old school but I like Webster’s definition of “Vaccine”: A substance that is put into the body and that protects the body from a disease. Oxford English dictionary has a similar reading: Vaccines are made from the virus itself, either weakened or killed, which will induce antibodies to bind and kill a live Virus. Maybe future abridged versions will have modified definitions…

By any and all definitions, these vaccines have all failed, failed to work, failed to protect anyone from getting Covid and from dying from Sars Covid 19. When those that have been vaccinated yet still became infected and died, Science and the Media tell you that it was due to you being fat, or old, or a newborn, or it was a bad batch, or because you took other medications or you have diabetes, or lupus, cancer, or some heart disease or you didn’t take 17 booster shots…. They point the blame everywhere else but not their actual drug as being the reason. All of these vaccines for covid have failed, just like so many drugs fail to make the cut – these covid vaccines failed miserably.

So, what is absolute proof of molecular efficacy, effectiveness, (APME) with any vaccine? APME would be any human, once vaccinated the required amount of times, showing they now have the proper and needed B and T cells (the molecules) to detect and defeat, in the case of covid, the sars covid virus. We didn’t do that, not in the trials and not once the vaccines were rolled out. We never showed that those vaccinated now had sufficient levels of antibody protection from Sars covid. Absolute Molecular proof was never shown.

As I spoke to prior, science has to determine the degree, level of antibodies needed to be sufficient in “providing protection” from the virus in question. This takes lots of time to determine.

The problem with the Covid-19 vaccines, all types from all companies, at the time they were rolled out, not one company knew and could show a safe level of protection due to their vaccine. No one knew the level of antibody protection needed to defeat covid 19, the titer level that would trigger T and B cells. And they still don’t know today July 2023 at the time of this writing.

Now, so many Pharmaceutical companies will refute this and show you their studies showing sufficient levels of Titers or any means to determine good protection and thus their vaccine will be or was/is effective at defeating the deadly virus. Well, aside from we all saw the virus not be defeated by so many who were vaccinated, the problem with those studies is they were not showing you matches for the actual virus in the air. Having 1000, 2500, or zero titer level, having B and T cells, means nothing if those levels are not antibodies and cells created to defeat atmospheric Covid.

“Atmospheric” covid, Sars 19 - refers to the real virus that is in the air, in spit, blood, semen, sweat, urine - and all the many ways it can travel from one living organism to another - or your hand touched a pole with moisture from another human that has the real virus.

Any and all immune responses that were created by a vaccine, can only be for what was in the vaccine. This includes the mRNA vaccines - The spike proteins made by SARS-CoV-2-infected cells and the spike proteins cells produce in response to the mRNA vaccine are nearly, although not exactly, identical. And “Nearly” is not going to cut it. And the ‘nearly’ part is all manner of suspect and dubious - but still - not a match.

If we are to buy into this idea of memory cells and building up immunities this way, a vaccine has to 100 percent match the virus, the whole, fully intact virus that is in the air. Not one of the vaccines had the actual whole, un attenuated, unadulterated, non modified virus that we know as Sars Covid-19. This is the part that escapes everyone in science. If you are trying to build up immunities for anything, any pathogen, germ, virus, bacteria, etc. it needs to have that entity injected into your arms.

Any antibody readings post vaccination will only tell you that it reacted one way or another to the stuff in the needle – which again is not the same as what is in the air we are breathing. The vaccine can’t be a close match, it can’t be 50 or 75 percent similar – not even 99 percent. It needs to be 100 percent an exact match or it will not work, not even a little bit, it will not work at all.

If we are counting on “memory cells” to recognize some virus in the air, then the body needs to have that entity put into the system prior. Consider your passwords on your electronic devices, or to log on to a bank account etc. It can’t be “close enough” to be recognized and allow entry. Your computer for example has been given a code, a set of particular and distinct characters of your choosing, and then each time you want entry, you type in those exact same characters, the computer will recognize it, and allow entry. And it has to be an exact match, not even off by a little bit. If 1 character is wrong but 11 are correct and in proper order/sequence, it doesn’t matter, it will not be a match, it will not be recognized, and you will not be allowed access.

We have eye (retina) scans to get in to top secret or high level places – and here again, an exact match is needed. And here again, your eyes were scanned prior and now the technology remembers your eye scan and will allow only an exact match.

So, any immune responses that the drug makers show you are not from covid in the air (atmospheric covid 19) but from whatever concoction is in the syringe. And that’s a huge difference, a deadly huge difference. If we were to compare the antibody types between someone naturally infected and not vaccinated, to those antibodies from someone not infected but just given the vaccine – the two sets would not match. One set would match atmospheric covid, the other would match what the lab put together - which means you are not protected with your vaccine, not from atmospheric covid 19 anyway.

And for those screaming it’s the spike protein, that that is key and does the trick – there too, not a chance. This new science, even though it’s been around as a study for decades, intends to exact a genetic match of the Sars virus from those truly infected and re create a new mRNA molecule complete with the genetic blueprint with this genetic information from the cells of the infected person. Yes, It's important to note that the mRNA used in vaccines is not extracted directly from the virus but is a laboratory-created copy based on the virus's genetic information from those infected.

But still, this is a tall order, the sequence of events from lab to syringe to inside your body. It’s the road most travelled for this hyper fragile mRNA molecule - even with layers of lipid protection, perfect temps (which go out the window once inside the body), preservatives like salts and potassium etc. and all the other chemicals in the syringe.

Spike proteins in and of themselves also vary, also morph from person to person. And, in the lab, synthesizing spike proteins, will never be an exact match to atmospheric covid spike proteins. Atmospheric covid is not a bunch of clone viruses floating about like so much pollen – no, the virus is being spread and being changed from organic entity to organic entity, living organism (or dead) to living organism (human to human, animal to human, human to animal).

Each time the virus enters a new organism and meshes DNA/RNA – a new form of virus is created. A virus, with its spike (s) engages with our cells and essentially has sex with the cell, the spike does the penetrating and once inside, the virus “shares” it’s DNA/RNA, and new cell babies are formed. If the body deems these new babies as not fitting in, not complementary to the whole of the organism, the body will do what it can to destroy those cells.

But win or lose, that body, human, will share/spread a new, different type of covid virus and new different type of spike as well. The difference may be ever so slight, ever so subtle, but that slightest of modifications is enough to make any vaccine not effective as regards memory cells and building up the proper immune response.

This hackneyed idea of memory cells, the body doesn’t know from profiles, from characteristics of a virus or a spike protein from a virus – the body merely sees things as foreign, as alien to it and reacts. Always remember, or consider, the spike protein on a virus, is wholly organic and still exists in tandem with the virus, with nuances, including viral membrane dynamics, that just can’t be duplicated in a lab.

So, all of this spike protein vaccine, a vaccine that generates a spike immune response to atmospheric Sars covid, will do the trick narrative is false. Especially since the spike itself is not alone and has been tampered with. A spike protein, will simply be seen by the body as an antigen and be dealt with or not depending on how deadly it is – but it’s not deadly by itself. I can drink a cup of spike proteins and nothing will happen – there is no dangerous/deadly DNA/RNA in the spike itself. Its real role, when attached to the virus, is to aid in breaching an organisms cells and allowing the actual virus which has the dangerous/deadly DNA/RNA data to hook up with our DNA/RNA. Is a natural spike protein on its own, toxic? Are lab made chemicals, the synthesized spike proteins, are they toxic?

Some in science are saying the spike protein itself is indeed toxic - but if so, this “toxicity” is wholly different from the actual virus in that it doesn’t have genetics with it that could corrupt a cell, turn the cell rogue. The body will see this spike protein “simply” as a mild threat and destroy it - our natural immune abilities, innate and or adaptive, will handle it. A spike protein, on it’s very own, has never killed anyone, caused autism, cancer, or got anyone sick.

Water and oxygen can be toxic. Toxic or no (I’ll leave that to others), here, the spike based vaccine, the spike itself is also tampered with. It is bunched in with other chemicals and molecules – that invariably impact a spike protein or any protein. Sodium, which lab work knows can protect (preserve) a protein/enzyme to some extent, but it too can impact the spike. Potassium minerals, fats, sugars, whatever, all these things are mashed together with the spike protein. From Acetic acid to TROMETHAMINE, these and all the other chemical ingredients in the vaccine mix will alter, modify, the molecular makeup, the “profile”, of the spike protein.

And of course heat can do this as well, or not being at a constant temperature (proteins can denature with the slightest degree of room temp change, and of course be destroyed at higher temps). We can store the vials in refrigerators but this is not always the case when you walk into a clinic and the vial has been sitting at room temps for quite a while. As well, once injected, the body temp will impact the spike protein and the mRNA molecule, fats and all.

So, once again, good luck building up an immune system defense that aims to identify and defeat atmospheric covid based on what was in the syringe…

But even the natural infection doesn’t guarantee much… Let’s backtrack a bit to say the original and long standing idea is that if an organism (human in this case) is infected, the first time, the body will react to it and try and defeat it. Part of this dynamic is “remembering” the enemy (bacteria, germ, pathogen etc.) so the next time it shows up (if of course you survived the first encounter) certain cells will recognize/remember said threat and again, begin to mount another defense.

But is this what’s really happening? No. In theory and perhaps lab and petri dish dynamics one might derive at such a conclusion (extrapolate from degrees of plausibility), but in real life, in all living organisms, this is not what is going on, memory wise. If this were the case then we would not need a second vaccine, and then multiples of boosters. We would also not need to take a flu shot every year (yes there are several strains of flu but inside of 4 years one has had a shot for all those strains).

But again, with natural infections, the organism that was invaded will mount a defense, we do have an immune system that could put up great fights and win many battles but also lose some, but memory has zero to do with it if it the antigen returns to your body.

Each time you are infected, the body is starting anew, it is a new fight, a new battle and it’s still a guess as to whether or not you will win this time – regardless if you defeated the same or similar enemy last time. It could be a slight semantics issue, there may be in fact some memory dynamic going on, but again, it is still useless because each fight is brand spanking new.

Your body may ‘remember’ the cold you had last month, but so what, you’re gonna have it again this month, and it will take two weeks or roughly 14 days to defeat it, or not and you die. Yes, humans have died from colds. And no amounts of preventive drugs or supplements (vitamin C), will spare you from any of these happenings.

So too flus. You can get the flu, the exact same strain or a different one, any number of times in a year. It is not just one season, you can get the flu in the summer just like in the winter – anytime. And here too, memory cells have zero to do with it, or won’t prevent the flu from wiping you out for weeks on end – or kill you.

Tens of thousands of people die from the flu each year. The CDC has 28,000 flu deaths in the years 2018 through 2019. And to be sure, all of those people who died from the flu, had the flu before and the supposedly naturally created memory cells and subsequent antibodies from the first 15 times they had the flu did squat to help or prevent death this last time. So too those many who took flu shots year in year out and created supposed “man-made” antibodies if you will, they did nothing to prevent you from getting the flu and they did nothing to prevent the flu from killing you.

And of course with cancer we see the exact same thing. One can get cancer, have cells go rouge, the body fights it and defeats it, but then sometimes it comes back and memory cells be dammed, it kills us this time around.

You can get Lyme disease twice, you can get Lyme disease three times, you can get it again and again and again. Like cancer, colds and flus, you can get these real live un attenuated, unadulterated viruses, germs, bacteria, pathogens etc. repeatedly and the immune system will either defeat the enemy, or succumb to it, and “memory cells” will play no role in any of this.

One can get Malaria repeatedly, with or without the vaccine.

The entire world or collective thinking about virology, needs to be revamped if not scraped altogether. Our collective understandings of how the immune system works is way off base. Not only can you not boost your immune system, you can’t do things to make you more immune to something. All that snake bite stuff and hanging out in a field full of pollen is fool’s gold, vaccines are fool’s gold.

Your body will not remember the pollen you just sniffed for hours, nor will it remember the snake bite from 2 years ago. People who suffer from allergies, still suffer from allergies. We have things to help with symptoms, but no true preventive measures. We have antivenin for snake bites but no snake vaccines proven effective.

We need to understand that health, so much of true homeostasis, is about the immune system and its ability to defeat an enemy each time it is faced with an enemy. All life forms – each and every species of plant and animal and bacteria owes its existence to its respective immune systems, its ability to fight and overcome pathogens – among many other things.

For each species, in the beginning there is a survive or die phase, a trial period if u will – can it withstand the elements and other environmental factors – as well again, pathogens. This process can take hundreds even thousands of years for a species to finally pass muster and allow that species to hang around for millions of years.

And this is not at all a memory dynamic or certainly not one that happens overnight, over weeks or even over years or your lifetime. Science must always mesh with reality and when preventive drugs fail to work, always, we need to realize the body is not able to remember pathogens, antigens etc. but instead deal with them anew each time they invade the body.

Science needs to fully realize that there is zero memory dynamic. If there were, the body wouldn’t need to muster up a quintillion separate, individual, and hyper specific unique set of antibodies to fight these invaders, to defend against these antigens. That’s right, we once thought the amount of “Unique” antibodies the body creates was around one Billion. We now have learned that the number is closer to a quintillion Unique, as in hyper specific immune responses – to all of the hyper specific and uber unique Antigens.

And it bears repeating that if the same antigen re appears a month or one year later as with colds and flus, the body is not looking in its files for those old B and T cells but instead mounting a brand new defense. This reality of a quintillion separate immune responses should wholly inform you that the preventive drug needs to be uber specific, 100 percent an exact match – as of 2023 science can still not do this, cannot create this drug. A super computer also can have a quintillion separate responses to passwords – and only allow for exact matches each and every time.

So, any lab that is not giving you the vaccine with the actual virus straight up no chaser, will not have that vaccine be any kind of effective. And of course to give someone the real covid virus is illegal, due to the great dangers and risks, those being death to the person vaxxed with the real deal stuff.

But as I said before, even the real deal stuff is zero guarantee for protection. The body will deal with it just like millions have dealt with the covid virus before we had the vaccines – it will reject/defeat it, be bothered by it long or short term, or succumb and die from the virus – the virus was able to multiply cellularly and spread and spread, like so many cancerous cells (which essentially they are at that point).

So my friends, whether you survive a cold, flu, cancer, Ebola, covid etc. or not, comes down to two things and two things only – your personal immune strength and the medical care you were given once you were infected and sick (which includes antidotes, anti-venoms, antibiotics and even ventilators). And I should insert a huge thank you to the Nurses and doctors around the globe who helped and are still helping to save lives during this current pandemic.

It’s is equally important to note that “Natural immunity” is bogus and a dangerous idea. Natural immunity is not at all reliable or dependable – for reasons stated above.

                                                                   ***************

At this point many reading this have now stopped reading and thrown their hands in the air screaming “but what about all the millions of lives vaccines have saved over the years, decades, centuries even?” I would begin to answer that big elephant in the room type question by saying that it should always be noted that humans have never ever been wiped out entirely as a species due to any pathogen (microbe, virus, germ, bacteria etc.) – not even half our species. It should equally be noted that no plague, in the history of man, has killed all those living at the time of said pandemic. Let’s also note that in the past, millions who were infected with a deadly virus, did not die from said viruses, many more survived and thrived than those who succumbed and died.

And of course, we must note that millions of humans in this era of the covid pandemic (start date roughly 2019/2020) who got infected, many, as in most, did not die, and many more didn’t even suffer a little bit. The “plague of Justinian” could possibly be the first pandemic in recorded history – this was around the Christian calendar year 541 – it lasted 2 years and did not kill everyone, just like the Spanish flu which lasted as long as this pandemic, without a vaccine and didn’t kill everyone.

We’ve had about 17 serious plagues since that first recorded one. We have also, obviously had pandemics prior to “preventive measures” (vaccines).

Here’s the thing – anyone can be immune to covid or cholera at any time, with or without a vaccine. The great Non Philosophical question has to forever be – How do we know if it’s the drugs/vaccines saving lives, or the person’s own natural immune mechanisms? The 8 year old who was given a vaccine of cow pox and then given the real smallpox, he suffered not at all, but was it due to the preventive measures (the vaccine) or simply his immune system, his level of immune strength?

Just like that boy who was given the real virus, many today got the real virus and did not die. And since they were not vaccinated, we can only say it was all about the immune system.

For decades now, I have been in conversations with people who tell me they saved their lives by eating this or that, from chicken and butter, to fruit smoothies. Countless times people have told me either personally or I read it somewhere how their high fat and meat diet shrunk their tumor, or how it was fruits and veggies, “smoothies”, that “pulled me from the brink of death” with their cancer situation. I always tell them – it wasn’t the food, it was your immune system.

But alas, just like with vaccines, these people don’t want to hear that. They insist it was the French fry that saved their life. Many don’t even know of immune systems, never thought to factor in immune systems – it was bacon that saved my life, that got me off medications (the keto narrative) just as it’s these vaccines saving my life.

What is hyper essential to realize and remember, as in never forget, is that with each and every pathogen that has plagued humans over the course of history, not everyone died. It has always been the case that the majority of those exposed to any virus or bacteria did not die. The survival rate historically matches what we see and know today in real time with covid, that it hugely outweighs mortality numbers.

And these numbers are in itself awkward in that we can’t tell, even today, who actually got it and there was zero impact on them, the body made quick work of the pathogen before even the mildest of symptoms could be experienced or before we could test them for covid.

A non agenda’d or apolitical look at history, recent or ancient, will reveal that all these plagues, came and went (speaking respectfully of course), and many came and went without vaccines (a modern invention). The Spanish Flu came and went, it killed many but that number was still vastly inferior to those not killed by this Flu (90 percent who were infected did not die). So too with the “plague of Justinian” (541 to 543), and the similar Black Death (1347 to 1351) – they came and went.

The Bubonic plague was fatal in about 50-70% of untreated cases, but perhaps 10-15% when treated. Dr. Jennifer Klunk, of the Daicel Arbor Biosciences team, as a graduate student at McMaster University, examined the remains of those who died from the Black Death plague and those who survived it.

Analyzing DNA from those old bones and others from London and Denmark, Klunk and her colleagues learned that “The survivors were much more likely to carry gene variants that boosted their immune response to Yersinia pestis, the flea-borne bacterium that causes the plague. One variant alone appears to have increased the chance of surviving the plague by 40%”.

The two major Cholera Pandemics also came and went. I use the idea of ‘came and went’ gingerly. Cholera, like small pox, moved about in waves, so one can say perhaps it never left, never “went”. But when cholera did “formerly” end – it was prior to a vaccine and again, the majority of those who contracted cholera, did not die.

It’s critically important to acknowledge that all of these virus or bacteria borne plagues, from Polio to cholera, Yersinia pestis (black/Bubonic) to Sars Covid – all share 90 percent of symptoms (even Small pox). Each will have something unique to them, like crippled legs with polio or intense skin rashes with Small pox – but those unique things were not in and of themselves the deadly factor.

As well, these few things that make a disease ‘unique’ are not consistent throughout that disease and its victims. Not everyone who got small pox got the severe skin condition. With the millions who got polio, only a mere fraction were crippled. Less than 10 percent of those who got polio were paralyzed or crippled (the CDC has it at less than 1 percent). Approximately 75% of all Polio cases are asymptomatic.

The bulk of Polio victims experienced those same symptoms of flus, covid, or any of the diseases that humans have been plagued by over millennia. I’m reminded of Olympic Gold Medal track and field Star Wilma Rudolph who had Polio as a child.

**********

One can say the reason for such homogeny among disease symptoms is simply because that’s how the body reacts when fighting any deadly antigen. Or we can say the reason is that all modern viruses (these inert chemicals that exist in the grey area between living and non-living entities) and bacteria, are basically variations on a few primordial viral and bacterial themes (in tandem with true living “host” organisms – bacteria, plants, animals). In this Covid pandemic we know that the virus is quite capable of morphing (mutating) into as many forms/strains as it will, sometimes a deadlier strain, sometimes a mild form. They call them “Variants”.   

I could go one further and say, covid is the new polio, polio was the new Spanish flu, and on and on, all variations of the early diseases that plagued man. When I said this on twitter, someone sarcastically replied by saying “ha, yeah right, show me how many people in this covid pandemic are using an iron lung…”. And of course I sent him a link about some British scientists in the early part of this pandemic who are working on a modern version of the iron lung. This twitter chap also didn’t realize that there was a great need for respirators during this covid pandemic.

https://newatlas.com/medical/british-engineers-modern-iron-lung-covid-19-ventilator-alternative/

The symptoms for Smallpox are the same as Covid. Covid 19 2023 symptoms list as (in no particular order) Fever or chills, Cough, Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, Fatigue, Muscle or body aches, Headache, New loss of taste or smell, Sore throat – and death.

Symptoms for Smallpox list as (in no particular order) Fever, headache, fatigue and weakness, Back ache, stomach ache, vomiting – and death. As for the rash thing, the non deadly but quasi unique to small pox characteristic, I will repeat, only a fraction of smallpox victims suffered from that.

And people in the medical world know severe skin issues are not at all exclusive to small pox (or, what’s in a name?). See images below, of the many various skin issues, in this modern day, the year 2023, that are not named Small Pox:

Yes, today, 2023 at the time of this writing there are still plenty of humans getting severe skin rashes, Pustular Rashes. The range of pustular skin disorders is broad from generalized pustular dermatoses, pustular psoriasis, Reiter’s disease and subcorneal pustular dermatosis etc. We can say chicken pox is different from small pox (2 different diseases caused by 2 different viruses) and point perhaps to some distinction is size of Spots or the amount of fluid in the pimple is different – but really, are we splitting hairs? Those two viruses are cousins if not twins.

From pimples and eczema to herpes to the various types of psoriasis, warts and shingles and some acutely extreme and rare ones like Coral skin – humans today and in the past are stricken with them. The Images above were a wide range of conditions, some virus/bacterial borne, ranging from beri beri, kwashiorkor, shingles, Psoriasis etc. – but none were of small pox cases.

But sure, as marketing would have it, go ahead and take the rare patient who is paralyzed and crippled and make them the focal point of Polio. Take the equally rare person with the extreme skin condition that sometimes came with smallpox and make him or her the poster child for the vaccine campaign. I’m sure some warped minds in the drug promotions dept. were, if not happy, not unhappy with the idea of a president, Roosevelt, being handicapped in some manner or three due to small pox.

Scare tactics, combined with the gullible masses, those who organically trust science and medicine, will get everyone to roll up their sleeves and beg to be vaccinated. If the vaccines worked, I too would roll up my sleeves and only slightly consider Risk/Reward – but knowing vaccines do not work, and have never ever been actually proven to work, I will not be so inclined to take any collection of foreign chemicals into my veins.

So, it’s not so insane to say covid is the Bubonic Plague 2.0 since they too share same or similar symptoms (fever, chills, vomiting, diarrhea, terrible aches and pains) and like small pox with the occasional oozing of pus – and death. All the diseases known to man include death as a symptom. And this is all because of viral and bacterial variations that are not truly dissimilar to one another (even bacteria vs viruses).

And now, with 8 billion humans existing, this current covid virus will be transformed by our human and other animal bodies, by bacteria etc. into, essentially, 8 billion new types of the virus. And as time progresses they will be given a new name. And 1 or 200 years from now we will look back and note that not everyone died from covid 19 and its immediate strains (variants), not before or after we had vaccines. Vaxxed or unvaxxed, only 1 percent of humans died from covid will be the final story 100 years from now.

 As well, all those who got infected and not vaxxed, did not die. And the reason was and will always be - the immune system. And it very well could be the case that if you got covid and are not at all impacted by it, that it might be due to some ancestral genetics (your lineage) that already dealt with this type of strain and made it moot null and void, harmless to you. This also for colds and flus, which so many do not get even as they come into contact daily with the various cold and flu germs.

That is the only way someone is truly immune to something and it is the only true preventive measure. Vaccines can never do this, can never replicate what takes scores of generations going back even tens of thousands of years if not millions to do.

Why there are places around the world where eating or drinking things can get you sick and not the natives – is a result of two things I just spoke to, genetics and thousands of years of developing those particular genetics. 

Since the beginning of our species, for any species, for better and or worse, we have been shaped and formed by both Bacteria and viruses, all plants and animals have. There are scores of viruses inside you right now, and like the bacteria inside you (in the trillions) most of them are not deadly but rather essential to how you operate. That is a subject for another time however.

One would hope that with these better understandings it would behoove everyone to dispense with claims that any virus has been “eradicated”. And certainly refrain from stating it was due to a Vaccine. I’m reminded of a most recent Major news outlet article on the subject of the latest Malaria Cases in Florida and Texas. The article mentioned Malaria was certified as “eradicated” in the United States in 1970. The article also mentioned that there are around 2000 cases of Malaria in the US each year. ?? And of course the article heading spoke to the most recent cases – and those by folks who did not travel outside the country.

Timing, historically, has also been awkward with claims of ending a pandemic or eradicating a virus.

In great Britian, during the late 1700s and mid 1800s, there were plenty of diseases that came and went, before they either rolled out a vaccine or if there was no vaccine at all. Even with smallpox, as many who were vaccinated were still dying, many in the Medical profession began to seriously question the efficacy of vaccines.

As one person who studies the history of vaccines stated “There was one public rebellion in Leicester England in 1885 that resulted in them largely stopping vaccination – which in a nutshell worked quite well for them with lower and lower smallpox deaths for the next 60 years”.

We saw with Polio, Jonas Salk was a potential candidate to win a Nobel Prize for seemingly ending the polio pandemic. However, if you do the real time line study (all you fact checkers out there), the height of the Polio epidemic in America was in the year 1952. After that, like every other pandemic in the history of man, pre and post vaccines, it began to wane, numbers of deaths began to decrease.

The drug was not approved, not rolled out, until April 1955, 3 years after it peaked and death numbers started to decline. As well, the medical community was getting a better handle on treatment of patients, along with masking and early forms of “lockdown”. So now, the pandemic/epidemic was on the back end of its “presence”, and we introduced a vaccine and as the years progressed the numbers continued to drop – and the science and media community said it was due to the Vaccine.

With covid, in the spring of 2020, March, April, May, New York City saw a surge of covid infections, the most anywhere in the country/world with death rates as much as 100 to 200 a day. This was also the peak of covid deaths in New York. At that time NYC actually had to set up “Pop up Morgues”. The City had large Freezer trucks in the streets to house the dead because the regular morgues were over filled. Even the Great Central Park had a section used as a triage center and Morgue. It was that bad, some horror movie type stuff.

By June of that same year, while the number of covid infections continued to greatly increase, the number of daily covid deaths, at one point, was Zero. It dropped to Zero – that was the daily newspaper headline “Zero Deaths”. And this was all before we had the covid vaccines (including the mRNA ones).

What had happened was… the NYC medical community was able, after the initial enormous surge of patients (never seen before), and the confusion and hysteria of not knowing what covid was, all it’s symptoms etc., things began to settle down over time and the doctors and nurses had a greater understanding of how to deal with “covid patients”.

I posed the question – ‘How do we know if it was the vaccine or the immune system that saved any life?’ – I will add a 3rd factor: How do we know if it was the Immune system, the vaccine, or the care of the medical staff at our hospitals that save virally or bacterially infected lives? Some will argue it was all three, but as I showed you, vaccines don’t work, can’t work – that memory cell thing again.

And yes, lockdowns, masks, as much as those politically minded many are vehemently prone to disagree, did help to mitigate the spread of covid – including sanitizing.

Masks and lockdowns (or some form of quarantining) are not new to containing the spread of germs, we’ve been doing that for thousands of years – so many forget this. Like an umbrella or your condom, if your mask doesn’t work – get a better one. If one still gets infected, because mask or no, we don’t exist isolated in a space station, then hope the immune system does what it can to protect you.

It is always about the immune system. There once was a quasi-campaign slogan that read “it’s the economy stupid” – I will modify that for medical science instances and say, “it’s the immune system dummy”. 2nd, is the post infection treatment by your nurses and doctors, managing uncomfortable symptoms and helping you rest and better allowing your immune system to fight and defeat the pathogen.

We see this post infection treatment dynamic a lot with rabies where they give you the vaccine after you’ve been infected, to help you not die. ?? More on that in a bit. Rabies could be the true poster child for making claims that vaccines work – but upon closer inspection, here too, not really. Rabies, to all in the medical world is perceived as certain death, almost like an ovarian cancer diagnosis used to be deemed ‘just a matter of months…”.

Rabies goes back thousands of years, one of the oldest diseases in history, long before vaccines. And of course medical science, true to form will tell you that rabies deaths have decreased solely due to vaccines. Never mind that most of us now, since 1885, know about rabies. We learn this as a child, and we know to stay away from many dogs, wild animals, raccoons, Bats etc. because of rabies, fear of getting bit and infected with rabies. Avoid rabid animals is the real protection, and the real reason there aren’t so many deaths.

And with the first rabies vaccines as I alluded to, here too a sort of sleight of hand heralded in the widespread use of the vaccine. The Rabies Vaccine was created by Louis Pasture. Pasture took some real strains of the virus and processed them until they were way less virulent. He then tested on dogs.

 Then he gave the first human shot to a young boy whose body was infected with Rabies, and then booster shots and the boy eventually recovered. Pasture then proceeded to treat another child who was also infected, and saved that child's life. He went on to treat over 350 patients from all over Europe, Russia and America.

So, asking for a friend, or 8 billion friends, what is wrong with this picture? The first thing to note here, they were all already infected. There was no mention of this vaccine being used as a preventive measure but as a treatment post infection. So again, was it the vaccine, or the immune strength of the individual, accompanied by nursing care?

But still, if a vaccine can be given post infection, why is that not being done today to save lives of those infected with rabies? Today, hundreds of years since Pasture saved the lives of over 300 who were already infected, we have it that we can’t really treat rabies, once you’re infected you are going to die. Even the CDC will tell you there is no single effective treatment for rabies once clinical signs are evident.

But as the Center for Disease Control says there is no effective treatment, that rabies is a death knell, they also speak to Postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) as a way to treat a patient infected with rabies. (PEP) consists of a dose of human rabies immune globulin (HRIG) and rabies vaccine given on the day of the rabies exposure, and then a dose of vaccine given again on days 3, 7, and 14.

The CDC states “For people who have never been vaccinated against rabies previously, postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) should always include administration of both HRIG and rabies vaccine. The combination of HRIG and vaccine is recommended for both bite and non-bite exposures, regardless of the interval between exposure and initiation of treatment. People who have been previously vaccinated or are receiving pre-exposure vaccination for rabies should receive only vaccine.”

So, is there a cure for Rabies or not? Mount Sanai Org says “There is no known treatment for people with symptoms of a rabies infection. It is nearly always a fatal illness”. They go on to say – “Once the symptoms appear, the person rarely survives the disease, even with treatment.”

Yet they too go on about how to treat an infected patient. Are they treating them back to good health, or just some kind of Hospice dynamic until the patient dies?

Mount Sanai states – “If there is any risk of rabies, you will be given a series of a preventive vaccine.” So again, I ask, how does this work? Which came first, the chicken or the egg keeps popping up in my head. How are you naturally infected with some virus, and then post infection you can take a Preventive drug/vaccine to cure you?

The scientific answer to this is – a rabies infection can take a very long to set up, for symptoms to appear and take hold in your body, so there is good enough time to initiate a vaccine protocol. This explanation blows Louis pasture out of the water. All his patients were obviously infected and with symptoms. We didn’t have the means of communication nor transportation 200 years ago for Pasture to learn about these patients and then meet up with them prior to the disease and its manifestations setting in.

Today’s science understands that a rabies infection, it’s Incubation, the period defined as the first day you were bit, infected, to the first onset of symptoms can range from days to years. Pasture did not know this, yet all of his 250 plus infected patients were saved by his vaccine. ??

But moreso, if Rabies can take X amount of time, why wouldn’t a vaccine to match also take this amount of time to build an immune response. With Pastures ‘primitive’ vaccine, or the current advanced vaccines for rabies, how do we get past this reality of memory cells, immune responses to a virus? How are we saying real rabies could take a month to set up, but this vaccine works right away? And it works so much so that all of pastures patients recovered fully, or even partially (they did not die).

And again, today, 2023, every reputable medical source says there is not a cure for rabies. This is not a laughing matter but it almost seems comical to say, “You’re going to die no matter what we do, but take these vaccines anyway”. ???

Also not funny but I’m guessing Louis Pasture had no one to “peer review” his work, there were no governing bodies up to the task of scrutinizing his work and findings. Similar to that other fellow with the small pox/cowpox vaccine 2 centuries ago. I’m just saying.

But if we speak to reality and that thing called the immune system, yes, rabies is a son of a bitch, with the greatest track record for killing humans. However, Reality tells us that people have survived full on rabies, some did with treatments, and some survived without any of the known protocol treatments. Reality has shown, the deep dive stuff that many in research don’t do, that people not at all vaccinated have still got rabies, and some have died and some have survived.

Reality has also told us that some that did get vaccinated have also, post vaccination, got bit, got infected, and died from complications due to rabies. There are also instances where someone who was vaccinated and still got rabies and died, the science community employed the idea of comorbidity. Yes, this current pandemic is not the first time science has felt a need to explain away some or many deaths.

Yes, one huge part of the narrative with this current pandemic was “comorbidity”. We questioned if those who did die during this pandemic was it from the virus or due to preexisting conditions (heart disease, diabetes, Lupus, etc.). Did having these other health issues put the patient over the top allowing for death?

Another word that has popped up during this pandemic and it is somewhat misleading or misdirecting – “Immunocompromised”. All humans, all 8 billion of us are, to one extent or another, Immunocompromised. We all fit onto the broadest spectrum that is immune strength or weakness. Getting a cold is your immune system being compromised just as a malignant tumor is.

With being Immunocompromised or especially with having preexisting medical issues, this can get quite muddy. Existing health issues, most times comes with drugs (your average Heart patient takes 5 different drugs) – and all drugs “lower or weaken your ability to fight infections”. All ads for prescription drugs, along with a hefty list of side effects, say “can lower your ability to fight infection” – which is code for ‘it will weaken your immune system’.

There is actually an ad running now for a vaccine. In the small print or fast talk section of the commercial they say “works best if you have a strong immune system…” – Wait what? And of course, further on in the ad they mention “this vaccine can lower your ability to fight infections” which again is code for IT WEAKENS YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM.

So, thanks to my medications and the vaccine itself, my immune system is more challenged, more compromised, and along comes a deadly virus. The only true question again is – can your immune system overcome this virus? Sometimes yes, sometimes no. This for everyone, the obese, the elderly, infants, teens, alcoholics, cocaine addicts, athletes in top shape, Dennis from Accounting – all can die from any virus, can die from Polio, can die from covid, can die from the Spanish flu and no vaccine has ever prevented these things from happening.

*****

In the Time of Cholera, or even 100 years ago with the Spanish flu and the more recent polio outbreak, we did not have social media. Today, we all don’t have to gather around the one radio in our home and listen to the one or two only broadcasts speaking to the Polio pandemic and then assuming what we heard was fact and thus took it as gospel and act according to what they told us – without question, without challenge (heck, back then ads told us cigarettes were good for you…).

Now, in this time of many TV and Radio News outlets – the internet, so many ideas are exchanged, so much medical information is available to the masses. The data and info also is not homogenous which has allowed for more and more questioning the status quo that is science telling us this or that drug works, this or that preventive drug (vaccine) works, that it’s safe and effective.

As Jay Z once said – “The streets is watching”. We the lay folk, what we are witnessing now with Lady Corona, is so much confusion, convolutedness, lies, retracted statements, admissions of incorrect data and info etc. And this is all from the experts, the actual scientists, biologists, virologists, epidemiologists, chemists, doctors etc. – and even the major drug companies have had to do press conferences revealing how they dropped the ball on so much of this. And the same with the leading health orgs and governing bodies like the FDA and CDC.

And the major news outlets, all with their expert medical staff, the resident doctor or scientist etc. are equally all over the place. In fairness to them however, they are strictly getting their cues from the FDA and the CDC – who get their cues from the drug manufacturers. But only in partial fairness: At some point these news outlets need to do a better job of providing a broader palette of understandings, from the wide number of varying medical science views.

As a news outfit, a journalistic entity, you can’t say you are “fair and balanced” if you are only getting your pandemic information from 1 or 2 sources (and the CDC and FDA are basically the same source) – especially if those sources are getting their cues from the makers of the vaccines. How is that objective reporting? You don’t have to commit to what the wide range of science, the independent scientists and labs say but you can still speak to some of it. And sure, add your disclaimers saying we the network do not share or represent the views expressed here – or something like that…

But no matter, today, many more of us regular folk are not tuned into the 6 or 11 O’clock news. No, we are, at all hours of the day, getting data and info about this pandemic from countless sources. The “dumb” gullible masses are now more informed than ever before. We now have opposing science views and takes from other doctors and scientists and again, the narrative is no longer homogenous.

But all of this can really mean not much, because still, so few know how the body works. As I said earlier, both in and out of science, those who make vaccines etc., so few know how the body works, in particular the immune system. While we do have opposition that says the vaccines don’t work, or they are doing so much harm, or both, there is no real molecular proof to much of this. We have some studies that show for sudden deaths but there is no real proof for cause of death due to the vaccines, just as there is no real proof of vaccine efficacy and effectiveness.

I will briefly offer that there is potential harm when being injected with Sodium and Potassium chloride – especially issues with your heart. Potassium Chloride (different from Potassium Citrate in bananas) and sodium are used in many vaccines as the preservative component, especially with the fragile, needing to be refrigerated mRNA vaccines.

When they give prisoners on death row a lethal injection, included in the protocol of drugs administered is Potassium Chloride – to stop the heart. Let me repeat that: the first in a series of injections is potassium Chloride, to stop the heart, and the other injections finish off the person. As well, sadly, some who have committed suicide, did so using potassium chloride.

The vaccine makers would argue back that the amount of potassium added to the mixture is very small, “negligible” and very different from the amount administered to those on death row. The FDA list some things as Generally Regarded as Safe (GRAS) but this is misleading on several fronts starting with generally regarded as safe is not the same as safe.

Science has a term “LD50” which means Lethal Dose - is the amount of an ingested substance that kills 50 percent of a test sample. From this is borne the idea that it’s the dose that counts or matters, “it’s the dose that is the poison”.

 Wrong, it’s the way any single person will react to any amount. No two people are alike (immune system once again). We hopefully have learned this with allergies. One person can eat an entire peanut butter and jelly sandwich and be fine, off they go to soccer practice, while to another person, just a whiff, the scent, of a peanut can cause serious harm even possible death. This is the case also with dairy and other food and non-food products (perfumes and air fresheners for example), so let’s all stop with the negligible amounts narrative.

Some of you might recall the “Angel of Death” nurse – Orville Lynn Majors – he used Potassium Chloride to kill those people. Granted, he used a ton of Potassium to really make sure they died, but still. Potassium Chloride has also been part of the Euthanizing protocols with animals.

Potassium Chloride is now unfortunately added to so many foods, all packaged and canned or jarred foods etc. So we are getting way too much of this in us. And while digestive dynamics and drinking lots of water can help with this lethal mineral added to our foods – having it along with sodium pumped directly into our flesh, our, veins is a whole other crap shoot – we have upped the risk factor. Speak to your doctor about your heart and this potassium issue when you are getting vaccinated.

But it’s not just sodium and potassium in the syringe, these vaccines have multiples of chemicals put into them, any one of them on their own can do damage let alone combined. Graphene oxide (which is in the vaccine) induces cell toxicity through plasma membrane damage - can lead to severe effects like thrombogenicity (blood clotting).

As I mentioned already any and all drugs have side effects from liver disease to causing heart and kidney failure, to increasing blood pressure, messing with our key glands, thyroid and pituitary – and can lead to diabetes and insulin resistance etc. So vaccines, technically a drug, can do damage to humans while not preventing anything. All risk and no reward.

I, like so many, especially here in America, grew up taking whatever vaccines they told us to take. It is now the norm, part of the American way of life to have everyone take vaccines. This has now worked its way down to giving newborns vaccines. Giving Vaccines to babies for things they have no way of really getting at such a young age (Hepatitis B for example). With tetanus, when ever have millions of babies, kids, teens, adults died from it? Never. Whether a vaccine works or not (I’m telling you they do not) – we all know they come with consequences, some subtle and more nuanced like a weakened immune system and some that directly damage your liver.

No drug, in the history of drugs, has been without some side effects, including the basic aspirin. All drugs challenge the immune system’s ability to fight, ward off, and defeat so many things, other things not related to the vaccine or the prescribed drug. To have infants, babies, newborns, children take a phalanx of vaccines greatly diminishes the chances of the human having a strong and robust immune system going forward.

The industry that makes these debilitating drugs and the medical practitioners (your doctor or shrink) wants you to take so so many all at once. So many preventive drugs pumped into your veins is also okay with the FDA, the CDC, NIH, the World Health Organization et al. It appears we now have a global medical system, one that is, to quote one Anthony Starks, comfortable with zero accountability.

As for the HPV Vaccine (Human papillomavirus), teenage girls do not need to take drugs to prevent them from getting cervical cancer. For one, it doesn’t prevent cervical cancer – like seriously how would that work? It’s cancer. Did they give the drug to 10 girls and ten girls they gave a placebo to, waited 12 years and it turned out that the ten placebo girls got cervical cancer and the other ten were spared now due to this drug…

As vaccines do not work, not at all, they certainly do not work to prevent cancer. I am sure the drug industry concocted some pathway narrative to show how teenage girls can or “will” get cancer, a form of scare tactics if you will but it is founded in no real science, nor any real patterns in history to which to draw on or from. Billions (with a B) of females around the world have grown up and do not have cervical cancer. Not any time in recorded medical history have even ¼ of all teenage girls grown up to have cervical cancer.

And now, they are suggesting we give our young sons this same vaccine. ?? But to be sure, pumping these girls and boys up with vaccines at this young age, or any age, will weaken their immune systems making it easier now for cells to go rogue. Cancer cells don’t like strong and hardy immune systems.

There is a growing push to have vaccines be treated like the other drugs and have them be required the same extensive time trials for safety – in advance of approval (certainly). I don’t care for this at all because “safety” can be explained away, trials are all kinds of hackneyed – and most significantly vaccines can’t work so why waste time, money and people power doing trials.

I spoke earlier of how it takes some decent time to determine the level of antibodies needed to provide protection from an antigen, but with covid, there was zero time, zero real time trials to determine any of this. Everyone got caught up in the newfangled idea of mRNA now as a method in preventing or curing diseases. Many complained that these vaccines were “developed too fast” – ‘warp speed’ was the term. Science countered with we have been working with mRNA for decades now so all we needed to do was employ the sars virus into the equation and Voila!!!

That last part was all kinds of misleading. At no time in mRNA’s history did we have some medical breakthrough with that type of “therapy” or preventive measures. In no time in the history of mRNA research and trials for anything did we have a successful breakthrough, showing its effectiveness for doing anything.

First of all, mRNA as a molecule is way too fragile as an exogenous entity. And no, all the lipid nanoparticles in the world won’t protect it. Lipids also suffer from exposure to light, oxygen, warmth etc. and sodium and potassium also won’t aid in the preservation of the vaccine concoction.

How does one even do a real trial for a vaccine without humans? You can’t. You can’t do a trial for a vaccine to protect against a deadly vaccine using humans as guinea pigs. You can’t determine titer levels that would now equate to safety, as well B and T cells that defeat covid, without a human being tested. There was a time in history, even recent, where prisoners were able to sign on to one medical study or another in exchange for a number of things, privileges, a reduced sentence or sometimes freedom.

But today, it’s not just immoral, but illegal. So, how do we do a test, what kinds of trials can we do to show that this vaccine will now prevent you from dying? How even, would placebo work? As I both alluded to and spoke directly to earlier, can we give ten people a covid vaccine, and ten people some placebo solution of b12 perhaps – and then send them into the world, send them out to meet up with atmospheric covid, wait 2 months and see what happens.

Well, that too is dangerous. And that never happened. There was no two months. One would hope there were 12 or 15 month trial periods – but warp speed was on tap and in no time we were rolling out vaccines. Forget approved or not approved, we rolled these vaccines out so fast, any idea of proof of efficacy should be at the forefront of all discussions.

And animal trials will always be a joke. Animals don’t get sick like us, they don’t get cancer, heart disease, diabetes etc. and if they got covid, won’t die from it. No animals are wearing masks, and none are vaccinated with covid vaccines – and all are fine. Please don’t bring up the one dog we think died from covid…

If you want to design a drug to help humans, you have to test on humans. If mice and dogs have hyper strong immune systems, as in they don’t get even a fraction of the diseases humans get, giving them cancer or covid to test a cancer or covid drug – is useless. Yes there is some math, some form of calculus involved with mice models to satisfy the differences of species – but not really, not really.

But still, in the supposed human covid vaccine trials, did we now see great levels of antibodies created by the vaccines? What were those levels, what were those numbers? And how did we determine the level of antibodies needed to then state we can speak now to being protected? If that level of protection number can take even 15 months to determine, how was it determined, if at all, inside of 3 months? 3 or 6 months to learn about the covid virus, begin to develop a vaccine for it, and then to put it through animal trials, human trials (usually 3 or 4 phases of trials) is the stuff of Hollywood.

Beyond movies, in real life it can take 5 to ten years on average to develop a vaccine for approval. The “record” was 4 years for one vaccine. With covid not all the vaccines were mRNA based yet they too came out in just mere months – not even a year. In one single calendar year, 2020, we had a novel virus appear on the scene, a pandemic as a result of said virus, and a vaccine for it.

Some may see this as a great science and medical achievement, one to be noted, praised, and heralded for years to come. Or, or, some might see this as the biggest snake oil campaign in the history of, well, snake oil campaigns. How anyone sees this will come down to their personal agendas, political, religious or otherwise, their personal understandings of science and medicine, their sensibilities towards the history of science, or any other number of things.

However one feels, no one should be bullied, mocked, harmed, for how they feel. If you trust the science, if you believe in drugs and vaccines, if you believe in the FDA, the CDC and WHO, etc. it is your right and no one should cast aspersions on you. So too those who are not so keen on science being put into their veins, they should be allowed to feel the way the feel sans consequence from others who are not of like mind.

And stop labeling those who demand to know more, who don’t trust big pharma or news outlets – as “anti-vaxxer”. Label them instead as decent folk who want the best for themselves and their loved ones, for their elderly and their children, just as you do.

And to that, this is where there is a silver lining for vaccine makers. I recently saw a video that read “Do vaccines make us healthier or sicker over time?” In the comments section, someone said and I quote: “if this video goes viral, many MD & pharma will loose $ 💰”. End quote.

I say, not so fast. What these drug companies have going for them, always, is percentages. If what I know and have expressed in this article is known by a few others (and it will only be a few), combined with those who see that video, even if it goes viral, along with those growing numbers of internet folk who are “antivaxxers” – that number, totaled, still adds up to squat. Squat as compared to the overwhelming number of humans who will still always put their faith and veins in science, the medical community, the FDA, CDC and the Media who are the go between twixt the FDA/CDC/Pharma and the masses.

If less than .0001 percent say big pharma is bad and only in it for the money, making crap drugs, ineffective medicines, harmful drugs and vaccines – that adds up to about $14,000 US dollars lost annually (I made those numbers up…). For Pharmaceutical companies to have the backing of the larger share of the world community which can total 99.9999 percent of humans – that adds up to trillions of dollars (I didn’t make those numbers up).

The anti drug/vaccine mouse can roar as loud as it wants, it’s still a mouse and no one can really hear it.

I, not any major news outlet, can remind folk that some of these companies have been sued for actual fraud (fraud is actually the word used on the court documents) for billions, and lost – and that still will not move the needle for those who are all in believers, trusters of science and science folk. The needle doesn’t budge when I tell folk that one of the companies that made a vaccine, never made a successful vaccine in their entire time as a company. They tried, but each time they failed, the FDA did not approve them, until now.

I can also tell you that one of those companies made a covid vaccine that rendered all manner of side effects, some lethal – to the extent that two dozen European countries have suspended the use of this vaccine makers product.

All true, all facts, everything can be fact checked – but it will not put a dent in the money made from vaccines during this pandemic.

“Uphill battle” doesn’t even begin to describe any and all efforts to hold these companies accountable. Even losing billions in a lawsuit pales to the ever increasing war chest these drug making companies have.

And it bears repeating, not all scientists, not all medical folk are bad, they are not evil, money grabbing people. The bulk are not. Most of this systemic problem is created by just a few.

THE LOGISTICAL IMPOSSIBILITY OF ENDING A PANDEMIC WITH A VACCINE.

Aside from the fact that it’s an impossibility of physics, chemistry and biology for vaccines to work – let’s say there was a remote Island nation, somewhere in the south pacific perhaps, one with a population of 120,000 humans. Suddenly a deadly virus is afoot and people are starting to die from it. The government and its medical science experts immediately react and respond by beginning to develop a vaccine – in tandem with shutting down all methods of leaving or entering the country (the island). Masks, sanitizers, etc. are handed out and various quarantine and lockdown protocols are put in place.

Now, 8 months in 12,000 have been infected and 3500 have died from being infected. 15 months in we have a vaccine and it is being injected into the arms of all 120,000 of the citizens (minus the 3500 that died). Now we are at 2 years and the number of infections and deaths are going down, all those who were infected have been sent to one isolated part of the island to ride it out. By the 3rd year, the pandemic is over, no more deaths and no more infections.

At this point the leaders of this country, along with the medical science community have rightly claimed that they not only flattened a curve but they have completely eradicated the virus and ended, fully, the pandemic. All the citizens were checked and no one on the island has the virus in their bloods so there is zero chance of spreading and thus we are done with this plague.

All of that obviously is a made up scenario. In real time, in real life, no country, the world, has never ever been able to be “done with a plague”. At no time in history of vaccines, has all humans been given the vaccine. We can start there. With small pox, with polio, and today with covid, not all humans took the vaccine. Even with mandates, soft or mild, during polio or covid were we able to inject all living beings with the vaccine.

And equal to that, at no time in medical history did we ever check everyone, as in EVERYONE, to see one, if they were infected, and two, to see if they had good, sufficient levels of antibodies in order to be protected once vaccinated. Never in modern history were those infected, made to be quarantined. Yes, if you were infected, on your own you stayed home. Or you didn’t, and no one knew who was walking around with the virus or not.

The NBA claimed success when they had their playoff season inside a “bubble”. The bubble was simply a single designated area where only the players, staff, sports media, and medical folk were allowed to enter. They were quite strict and diligent in their efforts. You couldn’t really leave the “compound/campus” if you will, or you had to wait a certain amount of time, with tests, before reentering. All were vaccinated, all were constantly checked for covid, and if you had covid you were quarantined until you no longer had covid.

So, one can see this, and use this as a great example of either lockdown effectiveness, vaccine effectiveness, testing regular and quarantine effectiveness etcetera. But not so fast. I live in a building with over a hundred people. There are buildings in my city with over a thousand people. And none of this bubble dynamic took place – and no one died. No sub pandemic started in my building or the hundreds of other buildings in my city.

And to be sure, not everyone in my building was vaccinated, not even remotely. So too the other buildings, not everyone was masked, sadly, not everyone stayed home, was sanitizing and on and on. Not just in my city, but this across the country and the globe.

And as I mentioned how the number of covid deaths dropped dramatically in a matter of months – before we had vaccines, so too, over all, the entire country and world, covid is now on its way out. And it bears repeating, “on its way out” just means morphing into perhaps a less deadly or more deadly form of the original covid – which as I have stated, is not really original.

So, once again, there will be the claim that the vaccines worked for covid 19, that they saved millions of lives, and that as a direct result of these vaccines, we have essentially ended the covid pandemic – and we can all go home now, nothing to see here…

And no one will really challenge this. No one will ask the CDC and FDA did we check to see if everyone was vaccinated (rhetorically, because we know so many are not vaccinated). No one will ask the CDC/FDA did we check to make sure no one, at least here in America, all 330 million of us, did not have, still, the covid virus in them – again, impossible to do and thus did not happen. The island scenario I put forth, along with the actual NBA bubble, none of that was done anywhere else in this country or around the world – so how in god’s name has the vaccine saved millions, how in anyone’s name did the vaccine end the covid pandemic?

‘NUMBERS NEVER LIE’ was the name of a TV sports show.

Well, yes they do, yes they can. Numbers, can be skewed 12 ways to Sunday if anyone cared to do that. We have myriad charts showing the effectiveness of the covid vaccines. Reports from hospitals showing who got sick, who died, comparing vaxxed and non vaxxed, old and young, Obese and non, comorbid vs the healthy, and on and on both for and against how effective or how ineffective the vaccines are. And just as many studies with numbers proving and disproving safety.

I don’t trust those types of numbers, those types of charts and graphics. Too much agenda at hand for my liking – and no, not just the follow the money type, but all sorts, including political agendas.

The Only numbers I want to see, is what I spoke to at the very beginning of this article, absolute proof of molecular efficacy – B and T cells, primed to detect and defeat not what is in the syringes, but what is in the air aka atmospheric Covid 19. And those numbers just don’t exist. They didn’t exist during the trial phases, during rollout, nor since. Not one person, in and out of science, has shown or can show and prove that once vaccinated, you now have the proper B and T cells, the needed amount of said cells and or antibodies, and then, once infected the body will recognize the actual virus and defeat it.

And it bears repeating we do not know what level of antibodies provide protection, what amount of B and T cells kills the atmospheric virus that is Sars Covid.

Not one person making these vaccines will do a real time test and expose themselves to the virus – to prove it works. If we ask any of these scientists, or members of the CDC/FDA to show us these vaccines work by having them be given the real covid virus – none would do it. To a person they will all offer up some reasoning to the effect that ‘well, we can’t be sure of how it would work on us individually seeing as how no two people are alike…” Which again speaks strictly to immune strength of the individual. Or they too just don’t trust that the vaccine actually works to prevent you from getting covid, getting sick (a little or a lot) or dying.

If I knew something worked, because I made it, be it a software program, an exoskeleton for a handy-capped human, a car that drove itself, a pill that made me invisible… I would have zero issues proving it worked through and through. And if it worked, there would not be a safety issue, a legal or moral issue – if it worked.

As crass as this sounds, many reading this will outright call fraud, they will outright say this is all crap, BS, that vaccines work and they have been proven time and again to work – to them I say if you really, truly believe vaccines work, get a rabies vaccine, and then get bit by a rabid animal. Suicide is not a crime in the United States and only some states have attempted suicide listed as a crime in their criminal statutes. So find a state that it’s wholly legal and have at it. Film it for us and show the world you can no longer die from rabies due to your vaccination. And for those who cry “I am naturally immune”, also get bit by a rabid animal and keep us posted to see how that worked out.

The truth is not afraid of being asked, a lie will avoid being questioned, challenged.

But the drug makers, the other silver lining (beyond waivers and side effects), is that they don’t really have to prove it works, or, better, they are not responsible for you if you do take their non-working vaccine, you still get infected, and you still die.

I will remind the layperson who is still asking ‘how could doctors and scientists be wrong? that science historically gets stuff wrong – all the time, errors are made, some corrected, many not and just overlooked. Any good and in depth study of any industry (politics, religion, education, military, health, legal, medical, scientific, agricultural, urban and rural developing, etc.) should reveal that none of them are without flaws, without crimes and injustices, without complicit dynamics, veiled codes of silence, without mistakes and accidents, without corruption, agendas and monetary motivations and so on and so forth.

We like to say we have checks and balances everywhere, but we actually don’t – or, the checks and balances are also fraught with flaws…and we as a whole, society en mass, are, for lack of a better word, clueless as to knowing where truth and facts really are – if there are any to begin with.

In addition to accidental or innocent errors, History has also seen its share of skullduggery in the world of peer review, well predating even the Tesla/Edison Feuds. And there, along with ego, money was part of the equation. Today, peer review of anything is a mockery and a money grab in many instances.

I would personally hope a place for the control of diseases as is the CDC (it’s in their name) and the FDA who has its origins as a federal consumer protection agency, that these agencies would be a place that provided the broadest scope for understanding so much about diseases and cures and preventions – and side effects and deaths. I would hope organizations like these would be the go to place where full disclosure was always on tap. And sadly it is not.

And I don’t really care that the CDC and the FDA is partnered with, funded in part by, major pharmaceutical companies, which many would see as a huge conflict of interest. I’m still vastly more concerned with the full breadth and scope of honesty and forthrightness that is lacking with these not for profit organizations. I can see how politics can be a hot mess and all over the place and most times the side you come down on with any issue is the side your party favors, but I would like to think that these entities created to serve the American public would provide full disclosure so that all citizens could be just as informed as they are.

 I don’t want to be told by the CDC/FDA or anyone that 20,000 people took the vaccine and 20,000 didn’t – and the latter got covid. That is all kinds of fraught with flaws. Just as clinical trials with human testimonies are also suspect. When drug companies say their vaccine is 50, 65 or even 90 percent effective – that is the same percentage of people who got covid and survived without the vaccine or treatment.

But to the point of this bit of writing – it is better to be safe than sorry and it is better to be truly more informed, fully informed about these vaccines as opposed to blind faith. Blind faith, believing we will now put an end to covid or I will now not get covid 19 because I had the vaccine – is not a slippery slope but rather the most dangerous hill – a hill not worth dying on. Always be diligent when there is a known virus afoot.

I’m reminded of this TV Mini Series out of Korea about a horse doctor who became a doctor for humans. At one point in the series some virus started to spread throughout the village. The doctor and others began to rip sections from their clothes and mask themselves with the fabric. Those who were already infected, they were immediately quarantined while being treated. The virus eventually came, killed some, and went away.

This show was written over a decade prior to the Corona virus pandemic. The writers new that the hint of a deadly virus going round one immediately covers their nose and mouth. Masking and taking immediate measures is how you deal with a virus. Just like the many images we see of the Spanish Flu of 1918, they all were wearing masks. And we had no vaccines for that pandemic – and it came, killed some, and went away. Take your vaccines and boosters if you are so inclined but don’t ever think you are now immune and can continue on without levels of protection and other protocols.

For one, you can’t prove you are immune, nor can any doctor – because again, no one knows what levels of anything equates to “protection” and as I hopefully explained to you, if you have ginormous levels of B and T cells, grand numbers of antibodies – they are for the stuff in the vaccine and not what is in the air we are all breathing and sharing.

                                                    Safe and Effective

To say a vaccine is "safe and effective" is an inherent contradiction in concepts. Every governmental or private medical science institution will say something to this effect: "All vaccines introduce into the body a harmless piece of a particular bacteria or virus, triggering an immune response." Note the word "harmless".  

The problem with the idea, fact or reality, of "harmless" is that in order for an immune response to be solicited, triggered, there needs to be some harm. There needs to be an impact, an actual threat, or a takeover of a cell and turning it rogue, in order to get and have an immune response. "Infection" is defined as the invasion of tissues by pathogens, their multiplication, and the reaction of host tissues to the infectious agent and the toxins they produce. An infectious disease, also known as a transmissible disease or communicable disease, is an illness resulting from an infection.

A Mammalian host (humans in particular) reacts to infections with an innate 

(primary/general) response, often involving inflammation, followed by an adaptive (secondary/specialized) response. 

The adaptive immune system takes over if the innate immune system is not able to destroy the germs. It specifically targets the type of germ (pathogen, antigen, virus, bacteria etc.) that is causing the infection. Combined, these levels of (phases of) immune responses fight the pathogen/antigen and hope to defeat it. Some argue there are not two types of immune response, the primary is all encompassing – but that discussion is neither here nor there in that the point is still about an immune response, or lack of.

So, the person who just got vaccinated needs to have some type, or some level of covid infection (in the case of covid), they need to be experiencing at least some if not all of the manifestations (symptoms) of what the real virus can do, of what happens to someone actually naturally infected and sick with the real virus. 

To say there will be some redness and swollenness in the part of the arm or buttocks where the needle went in, is not the body reacting to the virus or deadly bacteria, this speaks ONLY to the needle. It also doesn't speak to the ingredients unless the ingredients also are perceived by the body as toxic and deadly (the makers of the current vaccines tell us that the ingredients are not toxic and deadly but I’ve already addressed that).

I can stick a sewing needle into my arm and redness and swelling will ensue due to natural innate, general immune reactions. But the body needs to have covid [virus] actually get into a cell, have sex with said cell (swap DNA/RNA), and then we can begin to claim for real immune responses both innate and adaptive - and thus yield genuine antibodies and hopefully subsequent B and T cells. 

If a vaccine is "safe", then it can only, at best, trigger an innate immune response, not the critical Adaptive response (with those "memory cells"). Of the many ingredients in a vaccine that could pose a danger (potassium Chloride, Graphene oxide to name a few), 2 of them, mRNA and spike proteins (or pieces of the spike), together and or separately, are not toxic, neither of them are unto themselves or combined, pathogenic. As I mentioned earlier, I could drink an 8 oz glass of pure unadulterated mRNA molecules mixed in with pure non modified spike proteins - and nothing will happen, they will get destroyed not by immune responses but by regular digestive processes and end up as waste in my pee and or poop.

The entire premise for which vaccines are founded is to slowly or quickly build up an immune response to a particular threat and when given the vaccine, the body must respond to this vaccine, it's ingredients, in some type manner as it would respond to a natural infection, or there are zero chances of creating an immune response, innate and or adaptive. So, with any and all vaccines good luck trying to generate the proper and needed immune response, one with memory cells to boot, if the vaccine does not have the live virus in it. 

Attenuated won't work, dead/destroyed virus won't work, weakened or inactivated version of the virus can't work (since it uses an inactivated form of a virus, it cannot infect your cells and make you sick), a spike protein, or protein subunit won't work, mRNA also will not be a threat allowing for the making of covid antibodies and memory cells. Viral vector vaccines can't work because here too it is a changed, "harmless" virus. 

To have any chance for a vaccine to work against a virus, bacteria, etc. the vaccine must contain the real deal virus or bacteria etc., and those things cannot be in any way shape or form modified to be made harmless - because again, we need harm to create a genuine immune response - and not just some swelling and soreness in the region where the needle went into the body.

I spoke with a veterinarian who took a shot for Rabies when he first got out of med school. He said “I had a sore arm and a small lump. That’s it”. End quote. As we spoke about, rabies is all kinds of serious and beyond the usual “flu like symptoms” and just before coma and death you will experience a number of clear cut things - seizures, hallucinations, paralysis etc. If the rabies vaccine only rendered a sore arm and a small lump in the region, how is this generating an immune response worthy enough to defend against the actual rabies?

Most vets are told to take an annual “harmless” rabies shot. But if we have memory cells why would an annual shot be needed? Unlike your garden variety virus (covid or smallpox etc.), Rabies is supposedly "stable", doesn't mutate rapidly, the variant dynamic is not so much a thing.

The gentleman I spoke to only had the one shot decades ago. Now he never got bit in his role as vet or any other way so we don’t know if the vaccine worked. There was one vaccinated veterinarian who did get bit sometime after being inoculated and did die from rabies. Remember 3 things I spoke to with the creation of the rabies vaccine, Pasture, he processed the viral strains til they were way less virulent (harmless), he tested on dogs, and then he only used the vaccine as a post infection protocol.

I fully understand the health practitioner’s mantra of “first do no harm” but a vaccine cannot be harmless if it intends to be effective. A conundrum of sorts that modern science has yet to acknowledge and address.

                          ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

In conclusion and to my intro thoughts about this topic being censored by twitter and other platforms, in America at least, we have all manner of consumer reporting. For so many products and items that the public use, there is myriad literature available both on and off line that speaks to if a product works or doesn’t, the pros and cons, risk vs reward say for getting this washing machine over another brand etc.

With safety, here too consumer reports are quite handy for anything from Cars to Baby carriages. And these “consumer reports” are independent of the manufacturer singing its own praises, independent of some governing body, one that works in tandem with these manufacturers. These are truly independent organizations who mean it when they tell you they are looking out for the consumer and their safety, and their wallets.

Why is this different with drugs, with medications, with vaccines? How are the drug companies allowed a free pass essentially, and especially with vaccines? Why would social media owners and formal broadcast companies not allow for a full range of safety discussions? Why is a person immediately black balled, black listed, for challenging drug makers on safety issues? Something is fundamentally wrong with all of this.

If I told you the parachute won’t work, it would behoove you to look into why, so as to make sure the next parachute is not made from the same company with the same issues. We question and challenge the safety of parachutes, and even the planes we jump from, but we are not allowed to question a drug, not allowed to challenge a vaccine – without being labeled as some miscreant and subsequently ostracized.

The way I was raised was to question all things. It was not just trust everything. To just “trust the Science” is the most anti science statement ever – questioning and challenging science is how you do science.

Take care of yourselves everyone and thanks for reading.