The Immune System

THE IMMUNE SYSTEM

About 16 months into the pandemic someone asked me why so many people who are vaccinated, still got infected. I certainly didn’t give the pat answer that many offer up: “No one said the vaccine was 100 percent…”. That answer is all kinds of flawed as I will explain as we go. My answers (two key reasons) both shocked and angered her. The first reason was: Only a real live virus can create cells and antibodies to fight that same real live virus - and no vaccine has ever had the real live virus in it, never in the history of vaccines.

It’s essential to understand that none of these vaccines, no vaccine ever, had the actual live virus or bacterial strain in them. And obviously you can’t do that, it could potentially kill people - but,

that is the only way to generate the proper and needed immune response. We do have vaccines that are called “live vaccines” but they are not actually alive but instead a modified (attenuated) virus - which is different from an actual real live virus.

Of the various types of vaccines an attenuated virus does come closest to a live lethal virus, but that it is no longer deadly (lethal), it thus cannot infect you and make you sick, or kill you. And if it can’t make you in any way shape or form sick with, in this current case, SARS-CoV-2, then the body will not create B and T cells, antibodies etc. for SARS-CoV-2.

The idea of a vaccine, in theory, is to simulate infection and generate the cells and antibodies in potential advance of the real virus - or, stimulate, create, an infection and produce a cellular/antibody response to engage the real virus should it ever enter your body. But this doesn’t happen, this can’t happen. A covid vaccine doesn’t give you covid, so you will not be generating B or T cells, the body will not create antibodies for the actual live virus that is Covid19 (the Coronavirus).

You need to have actual Covid to develop the proper and needed cells and antibodies to fight Covid.

To say a vaccine is "safe and effective" is an inherent if not quasi contradiction in concepts. Every governmental or private medical science institution will say something to this effect: "All vaccines introduce into the body a harmless piece of a particular bacteria or virus, triggering an immune response." Note the word "harmless". Harm would suggest or imply that it gave you covid, but since you didn’t get covid then you were not harmed. But you also did not generate the necessary immune response, one that is needed to fight the real CoronaVirus.

I fully understand the health practitioner’s mantra of “first do no harm” but a vaccine cannot be harmless if it intends to be effective. A conundrum of sorts that modern science has yet to acknowledge and address.

Now getting the covid jab or any vaccine needle will cause a “reaction” - but it won’t be a covid reaction. I could jab my arm with a pencil, pen or knife, a “mechanical injury”, and there will certainly be a reaction, many leukocytes will react - but this will still, not at all, render you now immune to covid in the case of the covid vaccine and this current pandemic.

The vaccine didn’t create a covid reaction. After getting vaccinated you did not experience any of the symptoms of covid, you did not get covid sick, covid ill. Again, you might have had a reaction, felt a little off, dizzy perhaps, but that is not covid. Those feelings post vaccination can happen for a polio shot, or yellow fever, rabies, smallpox etc. Your body is reacting to two things, the pain of a needle breaching the skin, and foreign, alien, chemicals now cursing through the body (tissues, blood etc.).

Injecting toothpaste will cause a reaction as well.

After a covid vaccination and boosting, any antibodies created, will never, could never, be a match for the antibodies generated by those people actually infected by the live deadly virus.

Every vaccinated person who was exposed to covid, got covid. But, just like millions of unvaxxed people who got infected, it did not always manifest to sickness or death, nor did many even know they were infected.

I will go into greater detail later in this article, but for now, the second key reason why millions upon millions, upon millions where were vaccinated yet still got infected, many got sick, gravely ill and thousands even died - was/is, because we do not have memory cells.

No species does. For us humans, we have white blood cells that make proteins (antibodies) that fight pathogens but each battle with a germ is brand new, new cells, new antibodies etc. No fight the body has with a foreign, alien entity is based on memory, based on some past encounter. Each battle is a new battle with new soldiers. And this battle with germs is definitely not one that can be mimicked by vaccines or any other medical protocols (prevention type methodologies).

Only our immune system can win the battle against germs, against disease, against cancer. Or sadly, lose the battle.

Anyone in science (biochemistry, Physiology) who is being forthright with you, as opposed to just being stubbornly wired for Pharmacology, will tell you that pathogens can make us sick, but when we’re healthy, our bodies are capable of fighting them and the illnesses they bring.

So, injecting a vaccine into the body is useless, repeat useless - as in moot, null and void.

Her final question was - how did everyone in science miss or forget this? I asked her how much time she got…???

How much time do you have?

Any decent amount of research will reveal that immune system science is fraught with inconsistencies, poor interpretations, contradictions, false claims and so much more that gives rise to major head scratching. I will discuss those and more in this article.

One of the best books I ever read (on my top 3 list) was Bill Bryson’s A Short History of Nearly Everything. Among so many other wonderful Science based things the nearly 500 page book speaks to (discoveries and findings), he reminded us just how often, over the thousands of years of recorded history – we got stuff wrong, scientists got stuff wrong. Including the fact, one we are all familiar with, that at one point everybody thought the earth was flat - or at least not round.

From Geology, chemistry, physics, Medicine, epidemiology, bio-engineering, agriculture, Pathology, Genetics, Immunology, Anthropology, Archaeology, Biology, Astrophysics, Astronomy, Botany, Zoology, Neuroscience, Psychology, Mathematics, Aeronautical, Computer Science, Statistics, Earth, Ocean & Atmospheric Science, and on and on – there were and are countless OOPs moments.

Many of these oops moments, these trials fraught with errors, were big mess-ups, huge miscalculations etc. Conversely, some were minor and easily retracted and corrected. Some ideas and theories were scrapped altogether (back to the drawing board type stuff) while others that were suspect or truly in error managed to hang around, managed to become legitimate narratives over the years, decades and even centuries in some instances.

Some of what we got wrong in science or that took a long time to be corrected, scrapped or better understood was of little consequence, like how much does the planet earth weigh, or how do black holes do what they do. Did anything really change when Stephen Hawking apologized for being wrong about certain non-existent entities? No. Many times things we call theories, some in science act as if they are actual things that actually happened. The big bang theory is one example where the telling of it, the math and methodologies etc. is as if it’s not a theory but an actual occurrence some 13.7 billion years ago (give or take a day). That was not a religious take, just sayin.

I personally, with my research, have seen these errors, these scientific assumptions, not get rectified or scraped from the science journals of record, but instead calcify as doctrine, as absolutes – written in stone like so many commandments.

One example is proteins and amino acids, and as they relate to nitrogen fixing. 100 years ago science had it that we need certain dietary amino acids because we can’t synthesize them on our own. One issue was our (humans) inability to convert atmospheric Nitrogen to a more user friendly N3.

Fast forward 85 years later and science, with vastly superior technology, has shown that humans can in fact “fix” nitrogen, we have always been able to do this. Science has also learned that humans can synthesize essential amino acids like Leucine, Lysine, threonine etc.

But so very very few are aware of this. The global narrative still has it that we need to eat beef, soy or eggs to get proteins, to get these essential amino acids – we do not. Even ChatGPT doesn’t know we can make our own Leucine…See my other article for details and links (or ask for a link in the comments).

Science is not static

To be locked into a way of thinking just because it's been around for decades or centuries, is not the best way to do science, unless you want or need that particular discipline of science to be stagnant (which nobody wants).

One has to yield to other ideas, if only for a minute, if we are to advance in any field. Sometimes we have to suspend what we know, or what we thought we know/knew, put a pin in it, just temporarily perhaps, to have the best chance of growing in our understanding of something.

Or as one Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Physics put it: "Challenging assumptions is something that is an essential component in engineering. Being able to harvest the advantages of divergent thinking and creative thinking, is something that, in the end, promotes innovation and allows us to advance technology much faster."

Chiara Daraio

One should allow for a truly broad understanding of how things work, even if/when it goes against time honored dogma, paradigms and narratives. Science is not static. What can get in the way many times, is, as we saw with the Edison/Tesla feuds, ego, pride and money. These things can get in the way of advancing new ideas, or get in the way of scraping bad ideas or ideas that are not as effective or efficient as the latest idea.

What also gets in the way - is bad research. Or, these days, poor use of search engines. When we type in ‘How do memory cells work, or how does the immune system work?’, or ‘Do we have an immune system, and does it work?” We end up with literally thousands of links ALL with pretty much the same answer - 100% homogeneity as to how it all works however. The answer to how memory cells and the immune system works is the same everywhere.

So too for the latter questions, the answer is always “yes, we have an immune system and yes it does work” - and they all go on to tell us how. And, there is very little differentiation when describing the immune system, memory cells, and how they work. The internet, every textbook and science class has everyone on the same page. And each answer, each website, science website you land on, they all speak with great assuredness and precision about the immune system - as if all the science is done, and this clear and precise understanding of the immune system, antibodies, B and T cells, memory cells etc. has lead us to the greatest modern medical science advancement that we all employ today known as vaccines…

Almost like the wizard of OZ telling us there is nothing more to see here and we can all go home now.

But wait, what if we typed in, which no one ever does - “We know very little about the immune system and memory, B, cells”. Or, if we entered into the search engines - “B cells are still poorly understood in science”. This last part - go type that in and see what you come up with. For me, this was a rhetorical question, I knew the answer.

This is what I got, the answer that I knew going in: “While significant progress has been made in understanding B cells, many aspects of their biology, especially in relation to disease and immunity, remain poorly understood, with ongoing research focusing on areas like B cell tolerance, autoreactive B cells, and the role of B cells in various diseases.”

As they go on to tell us more on how little scientists know, they use words/terms like “more research is needed” or “still being investigated” or “not fully understood” or “mechanisms are being explored” or “a relatively unexplored area” or “it’s an area of ongoing research”. Almost sounds like any White house press meeting (Bazinga!).

Search engine continued: “Here's a more detailed look at why B cell biology is still considered a field with significant unknowns:

1. B Cell Heterogeneity and Function:

• Diverse Roles:
  B cells are not a homogenous population; they encompass various subtypes with distinct functions, including naïve B cells, memory B cells, and plasma cells.

• B Cell Subtypes:
  The functions of different B cell subtypes, especially in relation to tissue homeostasis and disease, are still being investigated.

• Division of Labor:
  The specific roles and interactions of different B cell populations within the immune system are not fully understood.

• B Cell Development:
  Understanding the mechanisms of B cell development, including the stages of maturation and differentiation, is crucial for understanding their function.

2. B Cells in Disease:

• Autoimmunity:
  B cells play a crucial role in autoimmune diseases, and the mechanisms by which autoreactive B cells arise and contribute to disease pathogenesis are still being investigated.

• B Cell Depletion Therapy:
  The success of B cell depletion therapies in treating autoimmune diseases has highlighted the importance of B cells in these conditions, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood.

• B Cells and Cancer:
  B cells can also be involved in cancer, and the mechanisms by which they contribute to tumor development and progression are being explored.

• B Cells in the Brain:
  The role of B cells in brain development and neurological diseases is also a relatively unexplored area.

3. Challenges in Research:

• Technological Limitations:
  Some research areas are limited by the lack of tools to identify and study specific B cell populations.

• B Cell Tolerance:
  The mechanisms by which the immune system prevents B cells from attacking the body's own tissues (tolerance) are not fully understood.

• Memory B Cell Induction:
  The induction of memory B cells by vaccines, and the mechanisms by which they provide long-term immunity, are areas of ongoing research.

The The induction of memory B cells by mRNA vaccines remains poorly understood https://www.nature.com/articles/s41590-021-00952-y

• B Cell Activation:
  The mechanisms by which B cells are activated and differentiate into antibody-producing cells are complex and not fully understood.

• B Cell Interactions:
  The interactions between B cells and other immune cells, such as T cells, are also being investigated.

• B Cell Function in Autoimmunity:
  The dynamics of autoreactive B cell responses and their relation to clinical disease activity in humans are poorly understood.

• B Cell Memory:
  The mechanisms by which B cells maintain their memory and respond to subsequent encounters with the same antigen are still being investigated.

End of the search engine DATA - some of which included AI. All of the topics I laid out are from top notch labs around the world - labs not trying to sell you anything, but instead truly trying to sort out and learn about Memory cells, even questioning whether or not they exist in the first place. It should be noted, this is all recent, even science writings from labs during this covid pandemic.

It should also be very well noted that this true interest in learning about B cells and memory etc. is but perhaps 8 percent of those in the vaccine making community. The rest don’t care, don’t consider that we truly don’t know about memory cells or the immune system for that matter - they just want to make vaccines, fully entrenched in the belief that we have memory cells and they work, that we have harnessed a protocol to prevent humans from getting infected and dead.

Yes, many might argue that these are the deeper dives as regards the immune system, that what we already know is enough, has been enough, to put some stuff in your body that will save your life, that will prevent you from getting a disease from any viral or bacterial strain.

Well, no, those writings are clearly stating we don’t truly know about memory cells. And in detail, the areas, the key, essential areas, we are very much in the dark about, the process by which they are generated.

And of course I remind those people that we didn’t even know about B cells when we first started injecting stuff into humans - that knowledge came almost 200 years later..

It has always been assumptions, speculation, conjecture, extrapolations on degrees of plausibility - and today, it still very much is. Science still doesn’t really know how the immune system works, how B cells work and on and on.

So much of why science doesn’t really know has to do with technology. Technology, as the engine search revealed, is still not capable of telling and showing us precisely what is going on inside live cells, cells in petri dishes, cells in living organisms - and certainly not the memory dynamic.

On the issues of truths, proof and claims… the first question I always ask as I begin my research journey to “get to the bottom of this” is “what technology did we have at the time of these discoveries or medical science claims or milestones/breakthroughs?” What technology was available, at their disposal, for these scientists and doctors, those many who set in motion certain narratives about, in this case, the immune system and how we have in some way shape or form harnessed its power or made use of it as a preventive protocol - in the case of Vaccines.

If you begin there, considering the technology of the era in question, you save a lot of time, you dispense with so much “claiming” and learn that most times these are just false claims, false narratives. Even as they have existed for hundreds of years as is the case with the world of inoculating humans.

Most people when doing research don’t ever consider what technology was employed 25, 60,100 years ago or 150, 200 years ago. And the layfolk, they also assume that science just knows what it’s doing, science must be right, because it’s science. Science couldn’t, wouldn’t, be wrong - tens of thousands of medical science people all saying the same things, all agreeing on the same subject, could not be wrong. And it snowballs from there.

Yes, we are all aware in science of the occasional, perhaps random snake oil and its salesperson, the one bad apple in medical science, in health and medical safeguard institutions like the FDA/CDC/WHO. We are also aware of the isolated incidence of error (or as some may see it, corruption) with any number of pharmaceutical corporations, complete with lost lawsuits for fraud (Pfizer has lost several suits for Fraud).

But for the very most part the masses trust the science, the masses never question or challenge the science and the myriad medical findings, discoveries and claims (claims of medical successes) many that even resulted in Nobel Prizes. And even those in science, students and seasoned scientists, just trust the science, trust their peers and elders.

And again, with the masses, we layfolk, we non science folk - we of little to no science acumen - never consider the technology. Most never even know to consider the technology. The “tech” I speak of, primarily, would be instruments for viewing, for seeing. The seeing I am speaking of is chemicals, molecules, cells, compounds - seeing all of these things with the human eye by way of an instrument, a microscope say. In a lab, it’s all about seeing, seeing what molecules do, how they do, how they react to other molecules, to chemicals, if they react at all.

Equally important, seeing cells, seeing inside cells, what cells do, how they work, what’s inside a cell, what is a cell made of, composed of. How do cells react to chemicals, to other cells - if they react or interact with other cells, intra/extra cellular dynamics.

In a lab, for scientists, seeing is knowing, seeing is thus believing - we see and know that when one molecule or cell is met with X criteria then Y happens - or nothing happens. In a lab, if I expose a protein molecule say to a certain temperature or level of PH we see what happens or doesn’t happen - Protein folding, the structure(s) of a protein for example.

In a lab when we look at the components that make up water, we see, witness, that in fact, in truth, we have a combination of hydrogen and oxygen (H2O). We can do this with so many materials, so many types of matter (if not all matter), from gasses to rocks, plants, animals, bacteria, viruses, blood, tissue, cells, flesh, organs, and on an on - we see, with our eyes, or aided by technological instruments, all these things.

Real science should be based on seeing, not assuming, not conjecture or extrapolations based on assumptions and degrees of plausibility - we see with our own eyes.

We see with our eyes, we assume with our mind.

I am belaboring this ‘seeing is believing’ so we don’t get lazy and dismiss the term/idea as something to disregard, dismiss or say “it’s not always the case that we have to see to believe…” In religion and philosophy perhaps - but in science NO. A football coach once said "Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing". For me, seeing isn’t everything - it’s the only thing - as regards proof.

Let me make a distinction for going forward: We have seen, in a lab, a cell that we named “B”, a B lymphocyte. We can see and identify the thousands of proteins/complexes on the surface of these white blood cells (membrane bound antibodies). We can, under a microscope, see where they originate (primarily produced in the bone marrow, specifically in the hematopoietic stem cells, after birth). We can see the “chosen” B cell (the one with the right combination of “Variable portions” on the receptor proteins) attach to the virus, the epitope, and even watch it multiply (cell division) and witness the reaction to the antigenic entity (pathogen). We can identify and distinguish some cells as “effector” cells and what they do.

We can categorize, based on seeing, certain critical cells of the immune system like CD8 T (killer Ts). We can also identify, see and identify, distinguish the 4 horsemen, the cells that make up the dynamic known as phagocytosis (macrophages, neutrophils, monocytes, and dendritic cells). Phago means: eating, cyte means: cell = phagocytes

We have the technology to see much of this, even if this all is still not clearly understood, the whys and hows. And still, by “see”, and its correlate “understand”, this is still somewhat suspect with the potential for extrapolations from degrees of plausibility - ‘it stands to reason that X does this so Y must do that…”. ??

What we do not have in any way shape or form, cannot see and thus prove, is the memory portion of the B cell claims. Many claim that the memory cell is a memory cell because it can hang around forever and fight that pathogen for years and years and years. Some are more modest and say ten years. But we have never witnessed any of this part of the memory claim - that a B cell made 25 years ago from a first encounter with a germ, virus or bacteria, suddenly perks up front and center to engage the old foe be it a germ, virus or bacteria.

We have studies, tested and seen cells, killer Ts for example, hang around post infection, post inoculation, and for many years - but this is not proof, not indicative that they are there fighting the same pathogen from yesteryear, or fighting any pathogen at any time after the first encounter.

When it comes to this memory dynamic, old cells fighting new battles with pathogens they battled before - suddenly real footage is nowhere to be found and another type of technology steps in to take over - CGI. Computer Generated images. Yes, there is no real live footage that shows that B cell, its antibodies, have been around for X amount of years and it was the exact same cells and proteins that engaged this recent invasion of the same pathogen.

And of course the elephant in the room is that ten years from now, or ten minutes from the first encounter, the chances of the pathogen being exactly the same one that was in your body that first time is slim to none, more like no chance seeing as how things mutate and morph.

Even smallpox, which morphs like a snail (up to 2 nucleotide mutations per year) is still not the same. More on this exactness factor later.

Talk of memory cells is akin to how we refer to the Big Bang - some math to try and if not “prove” it, then explain it - but nothing else. With theoretical science in the case of physics, we are allowed, under the quasi disclaimer if you will, of “theoretical”, to wax poetic about black holes, spaghettification and event horizons. And, like memory cells, when we tell those stories we can use, we can only use Computer Generated Images (CGI). Throw in a great bit of music and we’re off to the land of make believe - and the skies are not even the limit for our imagination.

The facts on the ground ladies and gents is that we have zero visual molecular/cellular proof of cells doing a memory thing. Not anywhere in the canon of data documented and or recorded via a microscope is there visual proof that this B cell and its antibodies, or any cell, is the same one(s) that fought the same pathogen a year ago, last week or 12 years ago.

Science has it that there are two stages or phases to the immune system, a 2 pronged approach if you will - innate and adaptive. Some put the case that there is just one, a single, integrated network. Beyond adding to much confusion, this argument I would suggest is neither here nor there.

Still, if we can see under a microscope the Phagocyte cells (macrophages, neutrophils, monocytes, and dendritic cells) let's call them the Beatles, the Innate or first part of the immune system's two pronged approach, attaching to a virus and either destroying the virus or just enabling/disabling it (making it inert, moot null and void?), we have never shown that the Beatles or Beatle clones did this before - or again. It is most likely the case that it was an entirely new band altogether. We could I suppose test this in a petri dish - Protozoa, virus, bacteria, and Fungi vs John, Paul, George and Ringo.

While many see these cells as not the memory portion of the immune process, some have suggested that Macrophages exhibit a form of memory (“trained immunity).

So we are crystal clear, I am saying and maintaining that we do have an immune system, with an amazing ability to fight pathogens and many times defeat them - but there is no memory dynamic, not in the innate or adaptive stages. Each battle is brand new, new B cells triggered to no longer be Naive, new Killer Ts etc. And that there is zero footage to the supposed memory effect, this dynamic of second or third engagements with the same antigen, supports my stance.

As I suggested, some have argued against this seeing is believing mantra - it cripples their argument to buy into that - especially on the subject of vaccines and the immune system. They offer up - “well, we can’t see the wind, we can’t see air, yet we know it’s there…”. Well, in many ways while we can’t visually see air - we have tools (technology) that allows us to understand the components of air - and like water, each time we mix these elemental components together (nitrogen making up about 78%, oxygen about 21%, and smaller amounts of argon, carbon dioxide, and other trace gases) - we have air. And we can certainly feel the wind and see the wind's impact on real things (Physical matter).

And yes, we have tech that allows us to “see” atoms. I put see in parentheses because it is not a true visual dynamic at the start but a way to understand or differentiate the many different atoms that make up the periodic table of elements.

I will eventually stop going down the tech worm hole but suffice it to say, Billions of dollars and centuries of human hours have been spent trying to see things, to better see things, to see things better - from the first lenses for vision correction of the 13th century to lenses made for microscopes in the late 1500s, and today super high tech tools - because, for the lab portion of this diatribe about microscopes, seeing is everything and the only manner for proof. No conjecture, zero assumptions.

So, when I consider the technology employed over the history of science claims (Chemo began, in the 1940s, vaccines started 200 years ago, the idea of essential amino acids came about in the 1940s, statins made their claim to fame 55 years ago) - I also consider the technology we have today.

Understanding where we are today can also dispense with claims and narratives of yesteryear. In Australia there is a lab, a group of scientists dedicated to the discipline in molecular biology called Single Molecule Science [SMS]. SMS is the ability to observe and track individual molecules and monitor molecular interactions in living cells.

To quote directly from their Website: SMS - It’s a collaboration between biologists, physicists and engineers that feeds off the capacity of new microscopes and other technology to identify single molecules and analyse their behaviour in intact samples.

It has emerged from developing, using and combining technologies such as single-molecule fluorescence and super resolution microscopy, atomic force microscopy, optical and magnetic tweezers, new sensors and more sophisticated computing and mathematical techniques.

Single Molecule Science presents us with a new way of understanding life processes from the bottom up, following the paths and changes of many different molecules as they move through the cell, form complexes with other molecules, and influence cell function.

And the more we know about molecular behavior in cells and organs, the better we are able to solve medical problems such as those involving DNA replication and repair and how they relate to the origin of cancers; signaling networks and inhibitors that regulate the immune system; and protein transport, for example in neuroscience.

This lab, these findings, this work - it is not in the 1700s, nor the 19th century. It is not the 1950s, not 1999. All this new tech that these scientists are giddy about is of this century.

Now of course in 2005 we didn’t just all of a sudden have this new tech, it was to be sure an evolution that did have its origins in the first microscopes and other type tech of days of old. From two cups and a string, to cell phones - yes, all tech is an evolutionary process.

But here is one of the things I am trying to convey about this new science, SMS. It’s revolutionary. For me that means while it is still on the evolution timeline it is a great leap forward, a great advancement, a leap and a bound yielding far superior understandings than ever before.

And guess what? With this giant tech leap forward, we still don’t know if B or T cells have memory. Nor, with this new state of the art gear, can we prove memory cells exist. And once more for clarity: We do have cells that fight infection and we’ve labeled them B and T etc - but the memory part, the idea that the cell, antibodies, remember the antigen if in the case it returns to the body some time down the road, the cell then identifies it and engages it and defeats it.

What is key about this great new tech - it’s still in a petri dish. We are still ONLY viewing the inside of cells, molecules etc. in a lab, in a plastic or glass container. We are not truly witnessing what actually happens in a living organism.

If these scientists involved with SMS have learned anything, it’s that, and again I quote; “single molecules behave quite differently in the complex architecture of cells and tissue than they do in solution or on the artificial surfaces found in the laboratory. This is because the structural elements—the cytoskeleton and membranes—are exceedingly complex themselves and are not static.”

And this is the problem with so much medical science, so many claims.

Many diseases can be successfully treated in the simple environment of a cell culture dish, but to successfully treat real people, the drug agent has to take a journey through the infinitely more complex environment within our bodies and arrive, intact, inside the affected cells.

That’s a comment largely about drugs and the assumptions made about efficacy and the inherent difficulties of pills say to make it to the target and do what science intends, hopes, it will do - but it also speaks to vaccines and medical assumptions in general and what the public is not informed about regarding drug efficacy.

So I say to you that even with the latest greatest cutting edge technology - as of the year 2025, we still do not have actual footage of this memory cell dynamic taking place in a living organism.

In science, in a lab, we can see cells in real time. We can see red and white blood cells, we can see, with our own eyes via a microscope, dead cells, new cells, cell daughters (mitosis). In real live time, we can see how many cells act and interact with other entities (drugs, chemicals, other cells, pathogens, food, booze (cells of the liver). We can see and witness adipocytes (fat cells), keratinocytes (skin cells), Stem cells and even sex cells (sperm and egg).

With the latest technology we can see so many of these cell dynamics in real time, in petri dishes etc. And while we can create and provide CGI footage to explain so much of how these cell goings on are going on, for broad reach teaching purposes (the internet), we can also have you all come into a lab and see all these live action cell dynamics.

However, with "memory cells" - all we have is CGI. There is not one bit of live cell footage of a cell, the Beatles, the B and T cells, Killer Ts etc. engaging a pathogen, taking some type of snapshot of said pathogen, it’s phenotype, then these cells make protein clones and creates an army of said clones now primed to detect and engage the same exact pathogen if it enters the body sometime later down the road. And once more for clarity - it’s the latter part, the down the road part, that we have zero visual footage of.

There is zero footage in the entire world of all of this memory dynamic (“trained immunity or adaptive) happening in a living organism or even a petri dish. All we have instead is thousands of transcripts explaining the theory/idea of memory cells, or what they believe to be the reality, the actuality of memory cells - and plenty of Computer Generated footage (based on said theories and hypotheticals).

Cells making clones, antibodies making plenty of itself, is not, repeat not, a memory dynamic, it’s what all cells do. What is actually happening is a basic shoring up the ranks if you will for the present battle at hand. And once this battle is over, win, lose or draw, cells and proteins die off or are consumed by the body, a process called autophagy. And even as we have cells like killer ts hanging around for years, we have never seen, visually witnessed, them engage the same pathogen those many years later.

What I do have live footage of is a cell, Neutrophil, one of the Beatles, going after and attacking, consuming a strain of bacteria (MRSA). The green dots are the bacteria. It’s kind of like the Game Pac Man with the mouth that gobbles up things…:

What science is claiming is that the cell in the video, Ringo Starr - is an exact match for that antigen and after it consumes it, if the same antigen appears years later, Ringo will be there to engage and defeat it, or at least engage and try to defeat it…

And we have no visual proof of this nor a test wherein we tag Ringo (using fluorescent labels, fluorescent proteins, Deuterium, or epitope tags, etc.), watch it do what it does naturally, organically, the first time, and see if it hangs around and reacts to the same antigen years later. This has never been done.

What is troubling to me is that even with SMS and the greatest minds in the field - we still have narratives based on assumptions. Those many scientists still; act as if we have memory cells, act as if that is a fact of the immune system, and never think, consider, that we don’t - thus here again, we have no real challenge to old dogma. Even as anyone reading this now, they think this is just some extensive antivax rant - if they’ve even got this far in this article.

Which one of them, which one of you science folk will stop to consider that we just might have been wrong on all of this memory cell stuff?

Do you even dare to consider this? Do you even dare to breach the subject to your colleagues, have them explore the notion, investigate - if even for a teachable moment. Or to settle the score once and for all.

As the archaeologist Josh Gates put it when looking for the great Yeti/Bigfoot “It would be great if it were true - but you have to prove it”. It would be great if we could prove we have memory cells, that given an injection of a virus say, you can’t get infected from the real one, you can’t get sick, you won’t die, you can’t even spread it once vaccinated - or as Anthony Fauci put it “vaccinated people essentially become “dead ends” for the virus to spread within their communities…

As you will see in this essay, none of this bore out to be true, to be factual, actual, in real life.

If all of what you have just read and will continue to read seems confusing, well, even the FDA is confused, or not exactly sure about all this. Actually, a year into the pandemic I began to get a sense that no one in the medical science community (biologists, chemists, virologists, doctors, immunologists, epidemiologists, the CDC/FDA/NIH/WHO etc.), has a good understanding of the body, viruses, vaccines – and most critically, the immune system.

It’s like here it is 2023/24 and now 25 at the time of this edit, viruses, pandemics, vaccines, are all new to us and “more work needs to be done to understand all this”. I have actually seen a virologist admit they got some things wrong. He tweeted: ‘it’s healthy to admit we don’t understand Covid and to have scientific disagreements about what we see and what it means…’.

Another virologist said, in the middle of this pandemic, that she read a study that suggests that people’s immune systems remember COVID-19 for months after recovery. Oh really? The virologist, name withheld, said “new studies showed that natural infection induced a strong response, and these studies now show that the responses last,” says Dr. ____________ at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology. “We are hopeful that a similar pattern of responses lasting over time will also emerge for the vaccine-induced responses.” This was in March of 2021.

So, an immunologist did not know that a natural viral infection would one, trigger an immune response, and two, have a lasting effect of any length. Which also speaks to they were not on board, prior to this pandemic, about memory cells. Hmmm

Again, It’s almost like this is the first pandemic humans have ever experienced and as the masses look to the science community for answers the confusion gets amped up 20 notches. That we have variants should not surprise scientists, doctors and especially epidemiologists – yet it did. How did they all not know that all microbes can and most times, will be, for better or worse, modified by the host organism?

Beyond the embarrassment that is the American medical system, the infrastructure that includes the FDA/CDC etc. this was not a time for our political and health leaders along with science and medical folk to not be on the same or at least similar pages.

I say all of this quasi preamble if you will, not as a disclaimer, not as an excuse to say we can fly unaided, the earth is flat, or humans can exist without oxygen etc. - and now you will believe me because “science makes mistakes all the time and or deep dive science says we don’t truly know about B cells…”.

This lengthy introduction is borne out of the many many times someone, doctor, scientist or layperson, has said to me something to the effect of “You mean my years of medical training, my wonderous science CV, extensive years of continuing education, and the fact that I literally delivered a talk on vaccines at a major conference just this morning – is for naught?” Said one doctor to me in a vaccine conversation. Or, “So everyone else in the world is dumb and you, a random person on social media is right…ok lol” Said a non science person to me in a conversation about amino acids. I get this a lot.

What is also presented to me many times is “there are thousands of peer reviewed papers on memory cells, and not one single bit of writing to the effect that we do not have memory cells. Why is this, why am I just now hearing about this no memory cells stuff for the first time?” The reason is everyone, as in everyone in this particular discipline of science - just assumed we had memory cells and this is how the immune system works. So they only look forward, they look to be able to better harness this memory dynamic - and by harness I mean make a drug, a vaccine.

We see this a lot with cancer and immunotherapy. PS: You can’t manipulate the immune system to do away with cancer and those being once again, honest, will tell you that it only “works” on a strong, robust, virile, immune system. Which means like the common cold, you can take treatment and you should be okay in about 14 days, or do nothing and you will feel better in roughly 2 weeks. Or get sicker and die. It all depends on the immune system.

Stem Cell research is not fools gold, it is the most promising approach to going against nature, with nature. Let's hope politics and profit don’t get in the way…

But I digress

So, you will not find one written challenge to memory cells, not even a tiny mention that hey, we just might not have memory cells. No, every institution, every lab that deals with the immune system, immunization, vaccine making, testing, developing, promoting etc. all epidemiologists, virologists, etc - all see memory cells as some pre proven thing hundreds of years ago - or decades ago.

It’s like in architecture we have certain established principles about strength and structure and the rules or laws of building a good strong, durable foundation - we have visually seen these dynamics played out in tests and real times, from the great builds of old to modern structures - and we don’t need to go over the “basics” again so we proceed with designing and building huge edifices. In math, we all know going in that 2 + 2 is 4, each time, every time, and all the principles of basic math are clearly laid out, visually proven and we go from there. No one questions or challenges 2+2 and we build great mathematical equations based on these known basics.

In chemistry 2 parts hydrogen when met with 1 part oxygen and a spark, always yields water - each time every time. This we have seen, proven to be the case when combining these elements and amounts of. And in the lab we engineer from there, with those rules of chemistry and laws of physics in our pocket - visually seen/proven rules and laws.

This is not the case with so much biology, and certainly not B cells. Physics we can visually show how things work, chemistry again is like math, here too we can visually see atoms, molecules, compounds, chemicals man or lab made - but biology is still the great unknown for the very most part. The WHY is still vague and in large part because Biology, unlike math and chemistry, is fluid.

Also because we can’t actually see what is going on at these hyper microscopic levels. We can assume much but prove little. It’s like the mind - we don’t really know the hows and whys of thought and action based on thought – we can assume much but prove little. And “pattern study” is not true proof nor true explaining of hows and whys. Pattern study, like Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) is how we got so much data that says “more people died who were not vaccinated than who were”. Which, as I will address further on, is most suspect, dubious even.

This topic on vaccines is one I have to treat with the greatest of care. At times I wish I had written this 10 or 15 years ago - or anytime prior to this Sars Covid 19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic. Perhaps those reading it then would be more open to hearing, learning, something “new” about the immune system. But things happen as they happen and here we are…

Today, it is a most explosive issue in the real world, the media world, in politics and in social media venues. There rarely is any middle ground – you are either pro vax or anti vax and labeled a stupid idiot for being either. And those approaches have also taken up political sides (I don’t do politics so that’s when I tap out of the thread).

My article however is worse. This article is not about taking or not taking a vaccine but instead, vaccines simply don’t work, have never worked and have never been proven to work, proven on a molecular, cellular level. This is the bulk of what I do with my science research and writings, those many that predate this pandemic. My work is chock full of showing how, where, when science got stuff wrong (cellularly/molecularly) - from a Physics, chemistry and biology perspective.

What does “molecular and cellular level” mean? I will go more into detail later but that doesn’t matter, the mere mention that vaccines don’t work, have never worked, will get your head chopped off, will have you banned from the universe, sent to Siberia to live out your days in isolation like so many lepers.

Twitter banned the link to the article, this article. They set in motion a global social media algorithm that blocks the link from even being posted, tweeted. And this for Facebook as well. I wasn’t even on facebook, but somehow it can’t be posted there as well.

It’s science people, calm down. You don’t have to agree with it, or believe it, but to shut down the idea that vaccines just might not have ever worked is not how real science is done, or should be done.

Twitter actually said this:

Twitter, now called x (which still blocks me when I’m getting too antivaxxy…), thought saying and showing vaccines don’t work was/is “harmful”.

While many complain about being harmed by vaccines, twitter will allow for millions to have at it, back and forth on the dangers of vaccines, but to claim they don’t work – then shutdown, censoring, is swift and widespread. In fairness, twitter doesn’t have a science staff to see and realize that the article actually makes a ton of cogent, salient points, ones that many scientists, guns to their heads, would have to agree with.

In the estimation of moi, it does way more harm to people by keeping this information from them. The stuff written in the following pages is stuff that should be front and center on all news platforms – if you really care about the masses, if you really want to protect the global public. Most things in life, from finance to sports, gambling, higher education (student loans) and taking prescription drugs is about Risk versus Reward – is the Juice worth the squeeze. If we think there is some harm in these vaccines, and I'm not saying there is (or isn’t), yet of no benefit, that’s kind of a big deal and one worthy of many discussions.

So, let’s begin (I suggest you cut and paste this for your desktop files before it is removed from this platform as well…). I can only play cat and mouse with changing the link for so long…

VACCINES DON’T WORK

As I stated earlier, we do have an immune system, all species do, complete with antibodies (Y shaped proteins), B and T cells, Killer Ts etc. but each battle with a pathogen is brand new, regardless of outcomes.

And “clonal” cells are also not how it works. A cloned cell, which happens all the time (binary fission, cell division etc.) is not about memory. Just like my parents made me, I don't remember their 'experiences' - I have many similar traits (hair. Skin etc.) but I am not them and cannot necessarily be as they are, do what they do and certainly not exactly what they do.

My parents can train me to be this or that but left to my own devices I might be a rockstar while my parents were computer programers. That antibodies make copies of themselves is how we gang up on the enemy - again, not a memory dynamic just part of the process for fighting germs, cancer and the like.

What’s funny or odd, if not ironic, is the formal idea of Memory is recent in vaccines’ 200 plus years history, as recent as the 1960s. It was in the 60’s that we discovered, or learned of Lymphocytes, B and T cells, their roles and functions. It was then we sorted out some theories and ideas that immune cells, when met with an enemy, either exogenous, in the case of airborne viruses or bacteria, germs, or “of the body” as is the case with many cancers, the cells will engage the pathogen and in some way understand it’s phenotype, and set about generating proteins, give them the way to recognize that pathogen, find it and defeat it.

I’m being quick about this, there is more to it, stages, different cells play different roles in the idea, theory, of memory cells. Macrophages, dendritic, etc. but the bottom line is that science has some basic understandings about the battle portion - but falls short on this idea that our cells can remember the pathogen it engaged so that the next time the same antigen shows up in the body, our memory cells will be fast to recognize them and also make quick work of the enemy.

And I will repeat throughout: we have never witnessed this in a human or in a lab (petri dish dynamics). They never bothered, it seemed, to look for this dynamic under a microscope.

Yes, Cells, antibodies (proteins), don’t always die after engagement - this we could possibly witness, we could, in real live time, study, track a B cell. We could see where it goes and what it does - and from there we could also possibly witness that same cell, those same antibodies, fighting covid again, and again and again. But still, this is not a memory dynamic - this is simply a cell and or protein doing its job.

Just like a security guard at a bank - it is just doing its job and each time a robber comes in the guard is trained to fight it, to defend the bank, its workers and customers. The guard doesn’t remember this robber nor care if this is the robbers first heist - the guard, the cell/antibody, is simply genetically designed to seek and destroy (attempt to destroy) the antigen (the enemy, the invader).

All of our cells are genetically designed, genetically predisposed if you will, to perform certain functions, duties, roles. This we can witness in a body and lab. This we have a great visual understanding about. The same with proteins (antibodies). And those cells can clone themselves (divide and conquer) and the cycle continues until we are dead. It is not a memory dynamic that we create lung cells every so often (cell regeneration), or skin cells when we shed. It is not a memory dynamic that produces hormones from cells. It is not due to memory that stem cells rapidly divide and differentiate into keratinocytes, which then produce keratin, the protein that makes up hair.

None of this is a memory dynamic. None of physiology is a memory dynamic, not even muscle memory. Antibodies are not memory based, or, they are without the capacity to remember entities. Even as they latch onto a pathogen - it is not really seeing it as a “pathogen” - it doesn’t know from a germ, a virus, bacteria etc. It doesn’t know the difference twixt Polio virus or Malaria or some bad fish you ate. It just knows that the body is in danger by way of this foreign matter, this alien entity. Just like food poisoning, the body tries to hurl it back up and out the way it came in or out via the back side - and the body doesn’t know what it was we just ate other than it didn’t agree with it.

There is no true taxonomy that occurs wherein pathogens are identified, itemized, categorized and filed away as such. No - it’s a blind fight against an apparent enemy, a perceived threat to the organism that is the human body. And win, lose or draw, the next battle, if the same enemy should reappear, is completely new, using new cells and proteins, and the body will react the same with the same spectrum of potential results.

The only potential “itemizing” if you will with the immune system is our cells identifying a hyper specific phenotype of the antigen/pathogen and creating proteins to seek out and combat said antigen, viral or bacterial. The B cell (Antigen presenting cell), takes parts of the antigen and brings it to the T cells so the cells know what they are fighting, so that they know what to look for. This we can see and witness in a body, in a lab.

Kind of like a police dog. We give them a scent, the dog locks the scent in, and then goes on a sniff search to find that scent, be it on a person or hidden drugs at the airport… This is called antigen presentation.

The idea of a vaccine perhaps, is to do the same - Present to your cells a whiff of the pathogen, then the B cell presents that to other certain battle ready cells, these cells wait around, or seek out the scent of the pathogen and destroy it…

But not so fast. The dog is given an exact precise scent, or has the ability to sniff through the many smells one’s clothes might have and lock into a key or prime scent. If one breaks out of jail and sheds his clothes, if the convict hasn’t taken a shower, put on new clothes and cologne, his scent will be a match. Cocaine is cocaine, and whatever it is cut with, if not pure, that scent will also be presented to the dog and consistency of scent is at hand.

With vaccines however, exactness, or lack of, is the problem - consistency of phenotypes is never the same. What is in the vaccine is Not what is in the air, not what is being transmitted around to many people. This we can see and witness in a lab as we make the vaccines.

Let me explain:

“Atmospheric Covid”

When the industry that makes vaccines tells you that their vaccine was successful in trials, they are speaking to seeing new B and T cells, new antibodies created post injection of any vaccine, as a direct result of the vaccine. ‘We have injected X into the rat or human and their blood is now showing a response to said injection in the manner of new B and or T cells, in the manner of new antibodies created by the cells, cells that are no longer “naive” (naive speaks to the cells early stage, not as yet stimulated by an antigen) but now primed to do what the immune system does - seek and destroy the enemy (pathogens, germs, viruses, antigens, bacteria etc.).

The problem with those studies is they were not, are not, showing you matches for the actual virus in the air but instead just a reaction to what is in the vaccine - and there is a difference. Those new B and T cells, those new antibodies were not, are not, a match for atmospheric Covid. Having new B and T cells, new antibodies, means nothing if those are not antibodies and cells created to defeat atmospheric Covid.

“Atmospheric” covid, Sars 19 - refers to the real actual live virus that is in the air, in spit, blood, semen, sweat, urine - and all the many ways it can travel from one living organism to another - or your hand touched a pole with moisture from another human that has the real virus.

“Real virus” refers to a virus that was not modified by man, by a lab, but exists in the wild, existing in many organisms, living species (animals, insects, humans etc.). The real virus will also be a variant, it has continually mutated, morphed over time - this change happens with each host it interacts with - and then it gets put back into the atmosphere by saliva, sweat gland, urine, blood, and so on and so forth. As transformed as it is, it is still a live and deadly virus.

Any and all immune responses that were created by a vaccine, can only be for what was in the vaccine. And this is why you don’t get covid when you take a vaccine (as I spoke to initially, you need to get covid to fight covid).

This includes the mRNA vaccines. Let's pause on my “no memory cells" for a moment and assume they exist. What I explain next would still be a problem. The spike proteins made by SARS-CoV-2-infected cells and the spike proteins cells produce in response to the mRNA vaccine are nearly, although not exactly, identical. And “Nearly” is not going to cut it. And the ‘nearly’ part is all manner of suspect and dubious - but still - not a match.

The many “experts” I talked to these past 4 years or so, I ask them, randomly; does the antibody have to be an exact match to the antigen, does a paratope have to be an exact match to the corresponding epitope, and how exact? Each time, they reply with “It needs to be a 100 percent match”. Several have said “it’s like a lock and key, the level of exactness”.

I agree. If we are to buy into this idea of memory cells and building up immunities this way, (which I still don’t), the contents of a vaccine has to 100 percent match the virus, the whole, fully intact virus that is in the air. Not one of the vaccines had the actual whole, un attenuated, unadulterated, non modified virus that we know as Sars Covid-19. This is the part that escapes everyone in science. If you are trying to build up immunities for anything, any pathogen, germ, virus, bacteria, etc. it needs to have that entity injected into your arms.

Any antibody readings post vaccination will only tell you that it reacted one way or another to the stuff in the needle – which again is not the same as what is in the air we are breathing. The vaccine can’t be a close match, it can’t be 50 or 75 percent similar – not even 99 percent. It needs to be 100 percent an exact match or it will not work, not even a little bit, it will not work at all.

I ask folks - if we have memory cells, why do we get colds repeatedly and flus repeatedly even when taking flu shots - or even getting covid more than once, vaxxed or not. The answer is always; there are over 200 types of colds, and flus and covid have different strains...

Which should inform us all that antibodies are hyper specific to antigens. When a covid vaccine is supposed to protect itself against the variants - that idea runs counter to the "different strains" argument for colds and flus. And a sars covid virus variant is still in the same sars family, just like many colds and flus - yet the body still sees them as different and creates different antibodies for different variations of the pathogen.

If we are counting on “memory cells”, protein antibodies produced by white blood cells, to recognize some virus in the air, then the body needs to have that entity put into the system prior. Consider your passwords on your electronic devices, or to log on to a bank account etc. It can’t be “close enough” to be recognized and allow entry. Your computer for example has been given a code, a set of particular and distinct characters of your choosing, and then each time you want entry, you type in those exact same characters, the computer will recognize it, and allow entry. And it has to be an exact match, not even off by a little bit. If 1 character is wrong but 11 are correct and in proper order/sequence, it doesn’t matter, it will not be a match, it will not be recognized, and you will not be allowed access.

We have eye (retina) scans to get into top secret or high level places – and here again, an exact match is needed. And here again, your eyes were scanned prior and now the technology remembers your eye scan and will allow only an exact match.

So, any 'immune responses' that the drug makers show you are not a covid response, covid in the air (atmospheric covid 19) but a response to whatever concoction is in the syringe. And that’s a huge difference, a deadly huge difference. If we were to compare the antibody types between someone naturally infected and not vaccinated, to those antibodies from someone not infected but just given the vaccine – the two sets would not match. One set could better match atmospheric covid, the other would match what the lab put together - which means you are not protected with your vaccine, not from atmospheric covid 19 anyway.

I said ‘could better match’ - meaning once the virus is in you and once it has made an impact, gone through the hide and seek phase, made its way to a cell, breached said cell and infected the cell and set it up for replication, that initial strain has morphed once again. Viruses can also be influenced by the host's own cells, further driving changes in their genetic makeup -

So, a B cell informing other cells is only informing them about the virus type that is in the body, which is not the same as the virus in a different body or the atmosphere, in addition to not being remotely similar to what’s in any vaccine.

And for those screaming it’s the spike protein, that that is key and does the trick – there too, not a chance. This new mRNA science, even though it’s been around as a study for decades, intends to exact a genetic match of the Sars virus from those truly infected and re-create a new mRNA molecule complete with the genetic blueprint with this genetic information from the cells of the infected person.

Yes, It's important to note that the mRNA used in vaccines is not extracted directly from the virus but is a laboratory-created copy based on the virus's genetic information from those infected. But, in the lab, synthesizing spike proteins will never be an exact match to atmospheric covid spike proteins. Let me repeat that: A lab made spike protein is Not the same as the live viral spike protein. Close, but no cigar.

As I mentioned, Atmospheric covid is not a bunch of clone viruses floating about like so much pollen – no, the virus is being spread and being changed from organic entity to organic entity, living organism to living organism. Spike proteins in and of themselves also vary, also mutate from person to person. Humans will share/spread a new, different, type of covid virus and new, different, type of spike as well. The difference may be ever so slight, ever so subtle, nuanced, but that slightest of modifications is enough to make any vaccine not effective as regards memory cells and building up the proper immune response.

And again, if you didn’t get covid from your vaccine, then you don’t have covid antibodies in you.

Trying to replicate atmospheric covid and its spikes, while at the same time create a one size fits all vaccine - is fools gold and not how the body works.

So, all of this spike protein vaccine, a vaccine that generates a spike immune response to atmospheric Sars covid, will do the trick narrative, is false. A spike protein will simply be seen by the body as an antigen and be dealt with or not depending on how deadly it is. But it’s not necessarily deadly by itself.

I can drink a cup of real or lab made spike proteins and nothing will happen – there is no dangerous/deadly DNA/RNA in the spike itself. Its real role, when attached to the real virus, is to aid in breaching an organism's cells (the “host cell”) and allowing the actual virus which has the dangerous/deadly DNA/RNA data to hook up with our DNA/RNA. Is a natural spike protein on its own, toxic? Are lab made chemicals, the synthesized spike proteins, are they toxic?

Some in and out of science are saying the spike protein itself is indeed toxic - but if so, this “toxicity” is wholly different from the actual covid virus in that it doesn’t have genetics with it that could corrupt a cell, turn the cell rogue - or certainly not create an infection akin to covid. The body will see this spike protein “simply” as a mild threat and destroy it - our natural immune abilities, innate and or adaptive, will handle it. A spike protein, on its own, has never killed anyone, caused autism, cancer, or got anyone sick.

At this point one could posit that if the spike is “harmless”, not seen as a true threat, how then could it generate an immune response, one that generates cells and antibodies and memory dynamics.

But effective at generating antibodies or no, we do know that the lab spike is different from the live viral spike. The lab based spikes are not, repeat not the same as the live viral spike proteins. The lab has made some modifications, added or subtracted an amino acid or two here and there. The phenotype is changed, the phenotype of a lab spike is different, not the same, as the phenotype of the viral spike protein. As it is, generally speaking, proteins and their makeup is hyper specific to their role, function and purpose. This we know from the basics, the fundamentals of proteomics.

One scientist, when speaking to how safe the vaccines are, wanted to assure the public that the viral spikes are different from the lab spike proteins. As she explained in good detail the modifications made and why, she used the term "apples and oranges". While this went a good way to perhaps quelling some public concern and fears about "spike proteins" - she is also unwittingly telling us that they are again, different, not the same. Apples and oranges.

If science states that an antigen, in any classic understanding, will cause the body to make an immune response against said antigen, and the immune response, the antibody, is an apples to apples dynamic, one is compelled thus to question all vaccines ever made, ever given to a human.

We can begin with the very first vaccine, one that most agree on was the first - the one made by Edward Jenner. Was what was in his vaccine, the contents/ingredients, the one given to a young boy, the same as the actual virus - Smallpox virus? The answer is no. It was cowpox. Cowpox, like monkeypox, is similar but again, not the same, not the same = not apples to apples. And of course, the boy did not get cowpox or smallpox from the vaccine.

Now of course Jenner didn’t know from apples and oranges or different strains or the exacting nature of antibodies - in large part because as I mentioned he didn’t know about antibodies - no one did. He might have been the first in vaccine science to just throw stuff at the wall and see what sticks.

We didn’t “discover” or learn about antibodies until 150 plus years later. What Jenner had was a sense about building up resistance which dates back thousands of years. To be sure, humans in and out of science have had ideas about sickness and diseases even thousands of years ago, and sought to develop not just cures but also preventive measures, including repeatedly getting bit by poisonous snakes as a way to “build up immunity”. I could also guess, or assume that Dr Jenner and his contemporaries might have been informed to some extent by the ideas of snake bites as a way to develop an immune response/resistance to – snake bites.

Humans have always had, along with remedies for what ails you, remedies for what might ail you in the future, aka preventive measures. Growing up I had always heard the old wives tale that if you wanted to rid yourself of hay fever go stand in a hay field or some area rich with pollen for half the day, take it all in, go through the extreme suffering, and then you will be fine, cured forever more.

And of course, reality proves this not to be the case, hay fever "season" and or allergies are a recurring thing for those who suffer from airborne allergies (pollen, pet dander etc.) and even food related allergies, some of which can be airborne (the scent of peanuts for example).

We know that many regions of the world, have their unique set of pathogens and the locals are mostly all immune to them (over decades, centuries, millennia) while us visitors need to take care not to drink the local water or eat the fresh fruits and veggies – not right away at least or cook them first. I always opt for bottled water when traveling, water by known brands.

There is also the idea that by eating enough fruits and types of seafood (shellfish), we can develop an immunity to certain non-biological poisons, Arsenic in apples, and even cyanide to a lesser extent.

As I alluded to, the snake tribes of Pakokku in Burma would tattoo themselves with a mixture of Black ink and snake venom (venom, not an anti-venom), so they could deal with inevitable snake bites later on in life.

The idea of being immune to or making oneself immune to pathogens, deadly microbes, toxins etc., and the subsequent vaccines – are founded in these perhaps ancient ideas of how to treat and or deal with exogenous things that can be deadly once inside you.

What all these immunity “protocols” real or imagined, have in common, is that they are speaking to real, live pathogens and toxins etc. They are using actual snake venom, or pollen, or are eating real apples and other foods that contain arsenic/cyanide etc. As well, with Edward Jenner (smallpox/cowpox), he used an actual virus (albeit a different virus). As opposed to what we have in modern vaccines.

What we have in modern vaccines, the spectrum range is broad: Modified, attenuated, weakened, dead, destroyed, inactivated, adulterated, simulated… Some of these mean the same thing but the point is not one of these vaccines employs the actual live virus (aka a deadly virus). A real live virus, a virus that was not modified, not attenuated, not adulterated, not a simulation, not a synthetic version, not a weakened version, not dead or destroyed, not inactivated.

And of course for good reason, a live virus injected into you could infect and kill you. While we don’t want to die from an injection, we also don’t want to waste time and money giving us something that is not a 100 percent spot on match for the virus in question (any deadly virus). And with all the many ingredients in these vaccines, many that could be harmful, the juice is just not at all worth the squeeze - for two reasons, apples to oranges, and we don’t have cells or proteins that actually remember pathogens.

And so, hundreds of years ago with the young boy, 8-year-old James Phipps, who was given the very first vaccine, it was not the vaccine that saved the boy's life. Yes, the boy was then, after the cowpox injection, given some real virus, Variloa virus, or “smallpox matter”. It is foggy as to whether or not this matter was in any way shape or form modified.

Nevertheless, he was given something, and did not die from that something - and it was declared a success and the world has run with that questionable success lo these many many years (centuries). That's right folks, all we had to go on was that the boy did not die once he was given the real virus (or a modified version). I am not saying that Dr Edward Jenner, the father of the first “successful” vaccine, made it all up, akin to the flat earthers or those who don’t believe we really landed on the moon, but I am saying all he had to go on was the boy not dying.

To say, “I have given this young boy a vaccine, then injected him with the real virus, and he was not affected by it…” (paraphrasing) - does not, should not, “prove” the vaccine worked. It should also not have dismissed the natural ability of the body, its immune system, to fight off and defeat viruses. This article is about the immune system after all.

Fast forward hundreds of years later with Sars Covid19 the coronavirus pandemic of this decade: many, as in millions, also got infected by the actual unadulterated, non modified, active, live virus - atmospheric covid - and did not die. Most didn’t even get sick. And I’m speaking to the millions that didn’t get a vaccine because these infections happened before the roll out of the various covid vaccines.

So many want to, wish to, ignore that reality, that fact. Science forgets we have an immune system. Science ignores the fact and reality, right here in modern times, 21st century, that millions got infected by the actual live virus - and did not die. Most, yes most, didn’t even get sick.

So Edward Jenner declaring his vaccine was a success because the young boy did not die - is not valid evidence, not actual proof. Many argue back that covid is not as deadly as smallpox. Perhaps - but is it a coincidence then that the same ratio of deaths from both are the same? Less than 2 percent, on average, of those infected with covid, polio, smallpox, Spanish flu, bubonic plague and on and on, died. And while percentages vary, at no point in the history of plagues and pandemics, with or without vaccines, did we see more than 10 percent of the populace die. Please don’t forget this super factoid. Never forget this.

This should wholly inform us all thus that less than 2 percent of humans have really weak immune systems. Because it is always about and only about the immune system and the broad spectrum from weak to strong for our species (which by the way has collectively the weakest immune systems of all the over 9 million species on earth). Ostrich is the strongest.

Dubious Data and human reluctance and resistance to change.

So, 5 thousand years ago, 200 years ago, today – we have not really proved these preventive measures actually work (beyond science just saying they work and we all just go with, trust, the science). We have not really shown, proven, that if you take some form (modified, attenuated, simulated, mRNA, spike) of a pathogen, in small doses or large – it will create the proper and needed immune protection and now you can be exposed to the actual virus or bacterial strain and nothing will happen to you, you won’t get sick, you won’t die.

‘NUMBERS NEVER LIE’ was the name of a TV sports show.

Well, maybe not in sports where true scores are tallied right before our very eyes, but everywhere else, they do and they can lie. Numbers can be skewed 12 ways to Sunday if anyone cares to do that. We see skewed numbers in politics, and claims that numbers were skewed, especially during campaigns. We see dubious numbers when those in science are trying to sell us something, sell us an idea and or product.

With this covid pandemic we have myriad charts showing the effectiveness of the covid vaccines. Reports from hospitals showing who got sick, who died, comparing vaxxed and non vaxxed, old and young, Obese and non, comorbid vs the healthy, and on and on both for and against how effective or how ineffective the vaccines are. And just as many studies with awkward numbers proving and disproving safety.

I don’t trust those types of numbers, those types of charts and graphics. Too much potential agenda at hand for my liking – and no, not just the follow the money type, but all sorts, including political agendas.

The Only numbers I want to see, is what I spoke to at the very beginning of this article, absolute visual cellular proof (footage) of B cells doing that memory thing I spoke of.

I don’t care to really speak to the hedging of bets type selling point where science tells us “if you do come into contact with the pathogen, once vaccinated at least it won’t kill you and the suffering will be mild and not sustained”. We have all now seen that not to be the case at all with the Millions of breakthroughs (Millions, with an M). And, thousands of fully vaxxed and boosted humans still got covid and died from covid (at one point the WHO had 7000 thousand breakthrough deaths in the first 10 months of vaccine rollout: Dec 2020 - Oct 2021). As for sustained protection, many fully vaxxed people now suffer from long covid…So much for memory cells.

I think they stopped using the word breakthrough. At first they said “rare breakthroughs” as if it were perhaps just 2 or 3 or even a dozen humans, but when it got to be hundreds and then thousands of vaxxed people dying still from covid, they nixed the rare thing as well the breakthrough word.

There were 3 million breakthroughs in NY State - alone. And that was only in a short time span, less than two years. This is what the NY State department of health posted back in 2023: “As of data received through May 8, 2023, the New York State Department of Health is aware of:

• 2,823,097 laboratory-confirmed breakthrough cases of COVID-19 among fully-vaccinated people in New York State

True to form (towing the company line) the report went on to compare this to the unvaccinated and continued to promote the covid vaccines as very successful.

But still, 3 million in NY state alone - and not every one in new york state was tested for their breakthroughs. Again, many just thought they had a cold or the flu and rode it out, never went to the doctor. But still, 3 million, in one state. If we combined the other 49 states, which I didn’t need to do because one state showing 3 million was all I needed to know. Now, many argued back that “No one said the vaccine was 100% effective…”.

Sidebar (digressing): When the vaccine makers report, 80 percent effective, or 65, or 90 - this is a result of vaccine trial estimates; Crudely speaking, out of 100 people in a trial, they give half of them the vaccine and the other half the placebo - and sees who gets sick. None of them are exposed to atmospheric covid. Some tests, they might give a real virus to the volunteers but only if the virus at hand is not a deadly one. Covid is deadly. But then, do they instead tell the placebo group to go out among the populace and not wear a mask - at the beginning of a pandemic when the virus is at it’s deadliest?

As for animal trials (mice, dogs, chimps, whomever), these other species have far superior immune systems than do humans. Not to mention different metabolic rates and life spans. How many of our pets got covid? How many rats in NYC died from covid? Giving a vaccine to an animal for testing is dumb science, and even if, when, science accounts for and does the calculus for the differences. This is true even for cancer studies and testing drugs on animals.

When every science website tries to explain the meaning of “effectiveness” with vaccines - they say this: “Vaccines do not provide full (100%) protection because of many factors, including our individual differences in immunity and response to infection.

They say “including” but they actually only mention it’s our immune system and how any individual's immune strength or weakness factors.

So they are low key telling us that it’s all about and only about the immune system. If you have a strong and hardy immune system the vaccine will work. If your immune system is in any way compromised, then the percentage lowers. Am I allowed to say no shit sherlock?

And I’ll follow up with - If my immune system is strong, then I don’t need a vaccine - especially since there are myriad potential health concerns due to the many ingredients in the vaccine. The juice thus is not worth the squeeze.

As well, if my immune system is weak, I can't use a vaccine anyway - according to you, it is useless, pointless - and more so since vaccines, all drugs, will weaken the immune system…

But still they all implied it was 100 percent effective, this hedging only began after we saw the millions of breakthroughs nationwide. And that report, they stopped collecting this data (at least for public consumption) back in 2023. Who knows how many millions more got breakthroughs - and even died as a result. Yes, in 2023, when honesty was still somewhat a thing as regards medical reporting, many fully vaxxed died.

Even the ABC report I cited - Before it got to those numbers(7000 breakthrough deaths), 7 paragraphs in, led with Why breakthrough COVID deaths can be misunderstood - The unvaccinated are 11.3x more likely to die than those who are vaccinated.

When any news outlet, any governmental report, published research done by the vaccine makers themselves - when they explain away breakthrough deaths, they speak to age, obesity, other health issues Yet, with the unvaccinated deaths there is ZERO mention of age, obesity, co morbidity issues etc. They just need everyone to believe they died because they were not vaccinated... That is shameful and derelict. I understand putting your best foot forward and positive thinking, keeping up a strong united front etc., but these are life and death matters and this type of “presentation” of facts needs to cease and desist.

The World Health Org, the CDC et al - they all have revamped their data collecting methodologies - or should i say how they interpret and share the data with the public. They have scrubbed so much data prior to 2023 and created a new set of data for public consumption.

Today, 2025, the WHO will bury true numbers, hard facts of deaths and breakthroughs etc. deep in their website pages. You first have to sift through so much positive data - even when you typed in ‘just the hard numbers please…’ Like a real estate broker showing you the beautiful rose bush outside the house - hoping that will better inform you - as opposed to showing you how damaged the electric and plumbing is, the hole in the roof and the backside of the building has been consumed by termites…

But in reality, they were not breakthroughs in the first place. A ‘breakthrough’ would imply, or science, the world of pharmacology would imply, that their drug/vaccine created a defense and in some cases the virus broke through the defenses and infected a person and or killed the person.

The fact of the matter is, there were no defenses to begin with. No man made defenses. The vaccines did not create an immune response to the covid virus that was/is rampant among us. If you died or survived once infected – it was all due to your personal immune strength, alongside a medical staff to help with things.

The added selling point of “you can no longer spread it”, well we saw that narrative also go up in flames. I think the most arrogant or cocky praise for any vaccine is that it works better than natural infection. Or, when you get vaccinated, this makes the battle with a pathogen a swift and decisive victory. Yes, it's the boldest claim that “vaccine induced memory cells can be activated quickly upon re-exposure to the same antigen, leading to a faster and more robust antibody response”.

The WHO et al puts it this way: [Vaccines] “creates memory cells that can quickly identify and neutralize the pathogen if you encounter it again”. Positive thinking and marketing at its finest.

Well, how’d that work out? How in the world did that work out with so many post vax infections, illnesses and deaths?

The science leaders also got carried away when they said their vaccines would also cover the variants – and true to form, Vaxxed people died from the variants as well.

The CDC/FDA timeline narrative on Covid literally went as follows: At first it was “The Vaccine will keep you from getting covid”, then it evolved (devolved) to “well at least you won’t get sick and die” and most recently, “Thousands of fully vaccinated people are dying, keep those masks on”. See original CDC covid banner (I only added text above and below it for my twitter use).

If just one fully vaxxed and boosted person in the world had died from covid, say General Colin Powell (RIP), we could perhaps call it an anomaly, or even a dozen people would be a curious rarity, an outlier type dynamic.

But hundreds dying is not an anomaly, hundreds and certainly thousands of vaxxed folk dying, is full on proof we don’t have memory cells and proof that you need to have covid in the vaccine in order to generate a defense for covid.

For many others however, this could simply bring into question drug failure. Drug failure is an easier pill to swallow than vaccines don’t work, can’t work, have never worked due to the real live virus not being in the vaccine and we don’t have memory cells.

Well yes, non preventive drugs (vaccines) do fail more times than they succeed (and that’s normal if you know anything about the pharmaceutical world). 9 out of 10 drugs fail to get approved, and this is after, on average, 10 years of study and development with 5 or 6 of those years in trial phases (the mRNA vaccine did only 67 days for all its trials before roll out). 90% drug failure in the world of pharmacology.

All that said, in 2022/23 the CDC et al would give us straight numbers, simple data if you will, as the breakthrough numbers piled up, as the breakthrough deaths piled up. Since then, May 2023, they stopped all that - it was just not a good look to have so many breakthroughs and deaths of fully vaxxed. It was a bad look to keep saying these breakthroughs were “due to a bad batch”. It was not a good look for a drug company for all to see in real live time such obvious drug failure.

If i might digress (again):The difference between now, today, this period from 2020 to 2026 - and 1990, 80, 70s, the time of polio, Smallpox, cholera etc. - is social media, the internet, the WORLD WIDE WEB. Today, when we get vaccinated, and then we still get infected, we still get sick and some can still die - people know about it. But not just medical people, not just the science and medical community - the entire world knows about it - you me and dupree.

And Not Pfizer, WHO, FDA, ABC/FOXCNN/NBC etc. can do anything about it as regards you the layperson knowing about it. These once monolithic news outlets, they can no longer truly sculpt a narrative (try as they might).

I am not implying so much was hidden from the public, swept under a rug, files hidden deep in some warehouse guarded by top men... What I am telling you is that if there was any skullduggery, hiding it today is damn near impossible - because we know things, like breakthroughs and deaths. And many times we the masses know this before the largess of the medical community does, before the CDC/WHO/FDA Pfizer does, before the major news networks do.

The individual and or private clinic can test someone and discover the breakthrough and before the lab can send this info to any global database the patient is online with social media telling the world they still got infected post vaccination.

So to be sure there were breakthroughs and deaths post vaccination during every prior era of mass inoculations, but those were essentially of little to no mention. Or just not realized, in large part because people didn’t regularly go get tests, or post vax tests or any kind of test just like you didn’t in this most recent “modern era” pandemic - they just got sick, maybe died and it was not necessarily documented as a breakthrough. So, all we got, the streamlined narrative, was that the vaccine dujour was a smashing success and in the case of smallpox a complete eradication.

So, today, as many a social media user has pathways of info that are vastly different from decades ago, many established institutions still want to control information and numbers. Yes, the data, yet and still, for many major news outlets, is hyper controlled, hyper skewed and thus very dubious.

And they even began speaking to what qualifies as being fully vaccinated - one dose or two doses or the time between doses and type of vaccine etc - it all became very convoluted and confusing. Dubious Data, Confusion, intentional or not, is a great way to have people just throw up their hands and say to heck with this matter and they move on, the news dies down.

“Memory cells” was a hackneyed idea to begin with. Even the natural infection doesn’t guarantee much… Let’s backtrack a bit to say the original and long standing idea/theory is that if an organism (human in this case) is infected, the first time, the body will react to it and try to defeat it. Part of this dynamic includes the claim - “remembering” the enemy (bacteria, germ, pathogen etc.) so the next time it shows up (if of course you survived the first encounter) certain cells will recognize/remember said threat and again, begin to mount another defense.

But again, with natural infections, the organism that was invaded will mount a defense, we do have an immune system that could put up great fights and win many battles but also lose some, but memory has zero to do with it if the antigen returns to your body. You can get covid over and over again. And the degree to which your body reacts and responds might not always be the same.

The first time one is infected it might be mild, if noticed at all (asymptomatic?). The second time they could get sick and then recover. The third encounter could kill the person. Now we can say each infection is a different strain so results will be different as well. Which again flies in the face of one shot covering all variants. It also flies in the face of any vaccine because there are MILLIONS of strains of the virus and the virus is constantly morphing as it passes from living organism to living organism. So by the time you whip up a new batch for new strains, that strain has moved on and we have myriad new strains in the population.

It is 2025 and in May 5, a new study was presented, it is now employing Artificial Intelligence to create mutation-resistant antibodies in an effort to try and keep up with the rapid rate of covid virus changes. Of course AI will help with that - but again, all for naught because this is not how the body works and once again science is barking up the wrong tree, still under the premise that vaccines work, that we have memory cells. None realize that a vaccine, if one subscribes to the memory dynamic, would still require a real live virus in it in order to generate the proper and needed immune response to the virus for which you are attempting to defend against.

Each time you are infected, the body is starting anew, it is a new fight, a new battle, new B cells, new antibodies, new Killer T cells etc. and it’s still a guess as to whether or not you will win this time – regardless if you defeated the same or similar enemy last time.

Your body (most likely your mind) may ‘remember’ the cold you had last month, but so what, you’re gonna have it again this month, and it will take two weeks or roughly 14 days to defeat it, or not and you die. Yes, humans have died from colds. And no amounts of preventive drugs or supplements (vitamin C), will spare you from any of these happenings.

So too flus. You can get the flu, the exact same strain or a different one, any number of times in a year. It is not just one season, you can get the flu in the summer just like in the winter – anytime. And here too, memory cells have zero to do with it, or won’t prevent the flu from wiping you out for weeks on end – or kill you.

Tens of thousands of people die from the flu each year. The CDC has 28,000 flu deaths in the years 2018 through 2019. And to be sure, all of those people who died from the flu, had the flu before and the supposedly naturally created “memory cells” and subsequent antibodies from the first 15 times they had the flu didn’t do squat to help or prevent death this last time.

So too those many who took flu shots year in year out and created supposed “man-made” antibodies if you will, they did nothing to prevent you from getting the flu and they did nothing to prevent the flu from killing you. To repeat: one could have all the flu shots in the world, be naturally exposed to the flu - and combined, there still will be zero memory dynamic that ensues and defeats the virus, and you can end up dead.

So all this talk about a vaccine will provide a faster, more robust response to a second invasion, is malarkey. Even our natural live virus generated antibodies and cells don’t provide a rapid, stronger response. It’s deceitful, intentionally or not, that vaccine makers want you to believe that their non threatening, fake, modified, attenuated, idea of a virus is going to protect you better than, or instead of the actual infection from the real Mckoy…

And of course with cancer we see the exact same thing. One can get cancer, have cells go rogue, the body and its Killer T cells fights it and defeats it, but then sometimes it comes back and memory cells be damned, it kills us this time around. This is called “Repeat cancer” or cancer recurrence - cancer cells that were previously undetectable reappear after a period of remission or treatment. The result for repeat cancer is not always death - It “comes down to immune strength at the time of cancer and repeat cancers”.

You can get Lyme disease twice, you can get Lyme disease three times, you can get it again and again and again. Like cancer, colds and flus, you can get these real live non attenuated, unadulterated viruses, germs, bacteria, pathogens etc. repeatedly and the immune system will either defeat the enemy, or succumb to it, and “memory cells” will play no role in any of this.

One can get Malaria repeatedly, with or without the vaccine.

The entire world or collective thinking about virology, needs to be revamped if not scraped altogether. Our collective understanding of how the immune system works is way off base. Not only can you not “boost” your immune system, you can’t do things to make you more immune to something. All that snake bite stuff and hanging out in a field full of pollen is fool’s gold, vaccines are fool’s gold.

Your body will not remember the pollen you just sniffed for hours, nor will it remember the snake bite from 2 years ago. People who suffer from allergies, still suffer from allergies. We have things to help with symptoms, but no true preventive measures. We have antivenom for snake bites but no snake vaccines proven effective.

Now, there are some who say we don’t have immune systems, it doesn’t exist, it’s all made up crap. These folk, these fringe types, also claim that viruses don’t exist. They see all the science of the immune system as so much fantastic hyperbole. I am not one of those people, with all due respect to them and the idea of challenging existing narratives.

While, as I have stated here, the Immune system is not fully understood and/or our understandings of it need to be revamped (science is not static), we do in fact have a built-in dynamic, I will call it the immune system, that defends against many things, foreign and domestic…

We need to understand that health, so much of true homeostasis, is about the immune system and its ability to defeat an enemy each time it is faced with an enemy. All life forms – each and every species of plant and animal and bacteria owes its existence to its respective immune systems, its ability to fight and overcome pathogens – among many other things.

For each species, in the beginning there is a survive or die phase, a trial period if you will – can it withstand the elements and other environmental factors – as well again, pathogens. This process can take hundreds even thousands of years for a species to finally pass muster and allow that species to hang around for millions of years.

Science must always mesh with reality and when preventive drugs fail to work, always, we need to realize the body is not able to remember pathogens, antigens etc. but instead deal with them anew each time they invade the body.

So my friends, whether you survive a cold, flu, cancer, Ebola, covid etc. or not, comes down to two things and two things only – your personal immune strength, and the medical care you were given once you were infected and sick (which includes antidotes, anti-venoms, antibiotics and even ventilators). And I should insert a huge thank you to the Nurses and doctors around the globe who helped and are still helping to save lives during this current pandemic.

And the “immune system” is not just about B and T cells and antibodies. The immune system is the entirety of the body trying to keep you alive, starting with the skin as the first and largest line of defense. And then enzymes in the mouth, in our stomach and intestines. The kidneys play a role and the liver is key to filtering the blood of impurities. Bone marrow, spleen, thymus, lymph nodes, tonsils, and mucous membranes, all play various roles in recognizing and fighting infections and other threats to the body.

I would offer up the idea that we are not actually “immune” to anything. Anything can harm us, make us sick, injured, wounded, ill, diseased, can kill us, but as i stated, our body’s have numerous mechanisms it employs to main “Homeostasis”.

Along with surgeries, post infection and or injury care, the Immune system (in its entirety) is the only thing that protects you and allows you to live.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

We are 70 plus pages in and to be sure, perhaps only 1 percent of those reading are understanding that medical science has made some huge errors, mistakes and missteps regarding the immune system, memory cells and vaccines. At this point many reading this have now stopped reading and thrown their hands in the air screaming “but what about all the millions of lives vaccines have saved over the years, decades, centuries even?”

Well, if you were paying attention, it was the immune system that saved millions of lives, or billions for that matter, seeing all the many years man has been beset with one plague or another (and to be sure, not just before we had vaccines, but before we had records of human history and the many goings on regarding health, sickness and disease).

I would begin to answer that big elephant in the room type question by saying that it should always be noted that humans have never ever been wiped out entirely as a species due to any pathogen (microbe, virus, germ, bacteria etc.) – not even half our species. It should equally be noted that no plague, in the history of man, has killed all those living at the time of said pandemic in any particular region(s) of the globe. Let’s also note that in the past, millions who were infected with a deadly virus, did not die from said viruses, many more survived and thrived than those who succumbed and died.

And of course, we must continue to note that millions of humans in this era of the covid pandemic (start date roughly 2019/2020) who got infected, many, as in most, did not die, and many more didn’t even suffer a little bit.

The “plague of Justinian” could possibly be the first pandemic in recorded history – this was around the Christian calendar year 541 – it lasted 2 years and did not kill everyone, just like the Spanish flu which lasted as long as this pandemic, without a vaccine and didn’t kill everyone.

We’ve had about 17 serious plagues since that first recorded one. We have also, obviously, had pandemics prior to “preventive measures” (vaccines).

Here’s the thing – anyone can not be impacted by covid or cholera at any time, with or without a vaccine. For some, the great Non Philosophical question has to forever be – How do we know if it’s the drugs/vaccines saving lives, or the person’s own natural defense mechanisms? The 8 year old who was given a vaccine of cowpox (not smallpox mind you) and then given the real smallpox virus, he suffered not at all, but was it due to the preventive measures (the vaccine) or simply his immune system, his high level of immune strength?

Just like that boy who was given a real virus, many today got the real coronavirus and did not die. And since they were not vaccinated, we can only say it was all about the immune system. That is the better assumption that is not really an assumption, if we’re paying attention.

For decades now, I have been in conversations with people who tell me they saved their lives by eating this or that, from chicken and butter, to fruit smoothies. Countless times people have told me either personally or I read it somewhere how their high fat and meat diet shrunk their tumor, or how it was fruits and veggies, “smoothies”, that “pulled me from the brink of death” with their cancer situation. I always tell them – it wasn’t the food, it was your immune system.

So many don’t know, or realize that even cancerous tumors can, without the aid of drugs or medical therapeutic intervention, gradually, spontaneously, disappear. We have these things called white blood cells, killer T cells, whose prime role is to gobble up cancer cells. The immune system.

Sidenote. Most people doing medical science work know that chemotherapy destroys the cells mother nature created to fight against cancer. Yes, chemotherapy can significantly decrease white blood cell counts.

You can research this for yourself folks: “Chemotherapy drugs work by targeting rapidly dividing cells, which include both cancer cells and healthy white blood cells. This reduction in white blood cells weakens the immune system and increases the risk of infections. Dot Dot Dot

One way to better ensure your immune system to be at its optimal strength, is to do nothing. Keep drugs, including vaccines with their myriad chemicals in them, far far away from your body. Our immune systems need to focus on fighting good fights, unencumbered by more external toxins. This is not some tree hugging holistic point of view - but a true explanation of how the body works and how the body works best.

Anyhoo… alas, just like with vaccines, these people don’t want to hear that it wasn’t your food, that it was your immune system. They insist it was the French fry that saved their life. Many don’t even know of immune systems, never thought to factor in immune systems – it was bacon that saved my life, that got me off medications (the keto narrative) just as it’s these vaccines saving my life.

Again, with each and every pathogen that has plagued humans over the course of history, not everyone died. It has always been the case that the majority of those exposed to any virus or bacteria did not die. The survival rate historically matches what we see and know today in real time with covid, that it hugely outweighs mortality numbers - less than 2 percent die. Some math folk have it at 1 percent (for every 100 infected, one died). No matter how one wants or needs to skew the data it will always be a low ratio. That part they can’t get around, especially in this era with a communication dynamic the world has never seen before - aka world wide web.

That said, these numbers are in itself awkward in that we can’t tell, even today, who actually got it and there was zero impact on them, the body made quick work of the pathogen before even the mildest of symptoms could be experienced or before we could test them for covid.

A non agenda’d or apolitical look at history, recent or ancient, will reveal that all these plagues, came and went (speaking respectfully of course), and many, most, came and went without vaccines (a modern invention). The Spanish Flu came and went, it killed many but that number was still vastly inferior to those not killed by this Flu (90 percent who were infected did not die). So too with the “plague of Justinian” (541 to 543), and the similar Black Death (1347 to 1351) – they came and went.

The Bubonic plague was fatal in about 50-70% of untreated cases, but perhaps 10-15% when treated. Dr. Jennifer Klunk, of the Daicel Arbor Biosciences team, as a graduate student at McMaster University, examined the remains of those who died from the Black Death plague and those who survived it.

Analyzing DNA from those old bones and others from London and Denmark, Klunk and her colleagues learned that “The survivors were much more likely to carry gene variants that boosted their immune response to Yersinia pestis, the flea-borne bacterium that causes the plague. One variant alone appears to have increased the chance of surviving the plague by 40%”.

The two major Cholera Pandemics also came and went. I use the idea of ‘came and went’ gingerly. Cholera, like smallpox, moved about in waves, so one can say perhaps it never left, never “went”. But when cholera did “formally” end – it was prior to a vaccine and again, the majority of those who contracted cholera did not die.

It’s critically important to acknowledge that all of these virus or bacteria borne plagues, from Polio to cholera, Yersinia pestis (black/Bubonic) to Sars Covid – all share 90 percent of symptoms (even Smallpox). Each will have something unique to them, like crippled legs with polio or intense skin rashes with Smallpox – but those unique things were not in and of themselves the deadly factor.

As well, these few things that make a disease ‘unique’ are not consistent throughout that disease and its victims. Not everyone who got smallpox got a severe skin condition. With the millions who got polio, only a tiny fraction were crippled. Less than 10 percent of those who got polio were paralyzed or crippled (the CDC has it at less than 1 percent). Approximately 75% of all Polio cases are asymptomatic.

The bulk of Polio victims experienced those same symptoms of flus, covid, or any of the diseases that humans have been plagued by over millennia. I’m reminded of Olympic Gold Medal track and field Star Wilma Rudolph who had Polio as a child.

**********

One can say the reason for such homogeneity among disease symptoms is simply because that’s how the body reacts when fighting any deadly antigen. Or we can say the reason is that all modern viruses (these inert chemicals that exist in the grey area between living and non-living entities) and bacteria, are basically variations on a few primordial viral and bacterial themes (in tandem with true living “host” organisms – bacteria, plants, animals). In this Covid pandemic we know that the virus is quite capable of morphing (mutating) into as many forms/strains as it will, sometimes a deadlier strain, sometimes a mild form. They call them “Variants”.

I could go one further and say, covid is the new polio, polio was the new Spanish flu, and on and on, all variations of the early diseases that plagued man. When I said this on twitter, someone sarcastically replied by saying “ha, yeah right, show me how many people in this covid pandemic are using an iron lung…”. And of course I sent him a link about some British scientists in the early part of this covid pandemic who are working on a modern version of the iron lung. This twitter chap also didn’t realize that there was a great need for respirators during this 21st century covid pandemic just like with polio in the middle of the last century.

https://newatlas.com/medical/british-engineers-modern-iron-lung-covid-19-ventilator-alternative/

The symptoms for Smallpox are the same as Covid. Covid 19 2023 symptoms list as (in no particular order) Fever or chills, Cough, Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, Fatigue, Muscle or body aches, Headache, New loss of taste or smell, Sore throat – and death.

Symptoms for Smallpox list as (in no particular order) Fever, headache, fatigue and weakness, Back ache, stomach ache, vomiting – and death. As for the rash thing, the non deadly but quasi unique to smallpox characteristic, I will repeat, only a fraction of smallpox victims suffered from that.

And people in the medical world know severe skin issues are not at all exclusive to smallpox (or, what’s in a name?). See images below, of the many various skin issues, in this modern day, the year 2023, that are not named Smallpox:

Yes, today, 2025 at the time of this writing there are still plenty of humans getting severe skin rashes, Pustular Rashes. The range of pustular skin disorders is broad from generalized pustular dermatosis, pustular psoriasis, Reiter’s disease and subcorneal pustular dermatosis etc. We can say chicken pox is different from smallpox (2 different diseases caused by 2 different viruses) and point perhaps to some distinction is size of Spots or the amount of fluid in the pimple is different – but really, are we splitting hairs? Those two viruses are cousins if not twins.

From pimples and eczema to herpes to the various types of psoriasis, warts and shingles and some acutely extreme and rare ones like Coral skin – humans today and in the past are stricken with them. The Images above were a wide range of conditions, some virus/bacterial borne, ranging from beri beri, kwashiorkor, shingles, Psoriasis etc. – but none were of smallpox cases.

But sure, as marketing would have it, go ahead and take the rare patient who is paralyzed and crippled and make them the focal point of Polio. Take the equally rare person with the extreme skin condition that sometimes came with smallpox and make him or her the poster child for the vaccine campaign. I’m sure some warped minds in the drug promotions dept. were, if not happy, not unhappy with the idea of a president, Roosevelt, being handicapped in some manner or three due to smallpox.

Scare tactics, combined with the gullible masses, those who organically trust science and medicine, will get everyone to roll up their sleeves and beg to be vaccinated. If the vaccines worked, I too would roll up my sleeves and only slightly consider Risk/Reward – but knowing vaccines do not work, and have never ever been actually cellularly proven to work, I will not be so inclined to take any collection of foreign chemicals into my veins.

So, it’s not so insane to say covid is the Bubonic Plague 2.0 since they too share same or similar symptoms (fever, chills, vomiting, diarrhea, terrible aches and pains) and like smallpox with the occasional oozing of pus – and death. All the diseases known to man include death as a symptom. And this is all because of viral and bacterial variations that are not truly dissimilar to one another (even bacteria vs viruses).

And now, with 8 billion humans existing, this current covid virus will be transformed by our human and other animal bodies, by bacteria etc. into, essentially, 8 billion new types of the virus. And as time progresses they will be given a new name. And 1 or 200 years from now we will look back and note that not everyone died from covid 19 and its immediate strains (variants), not before or after we had vaccines. Vaxxed or not vaxxed, only 1 percent of humans died from covid will be the final story 100 years from now.

As well, all those who got infected and not vaxxed, did not die. And the reason was and will always be - the immune system. And it very well could be the case that if you got covid and are not at all impacted by it, that it might be due to some ancestral genetics (your lineage) that already dealt with this type of strain and made it moot null and void, harmless to you. This also for colds and flus, which so many do not get even as they come into contact daily with the various cold and flu germs.

That is the only way someone is truly “immune” to something (or has a strong resistance to it) and it is the only true preventive measure. Vaccines can never do this, can never replicate what takes scores of generations going back even tens of thousands of years if not millions to do.

That there are places around the world where eating or drinking things can get you sick and not the natives – is a result of two things I just spoke to, genetics and thousands of years of developing those particular genetics.

Since the beginning of our species, for any species, for better and or worse, we, our genetics and us as whole living organisms, have been shaped and formed by both Bacteria and viruses, all plants and animals have. There are scores of viruses inside you right now (over 380 trillion viruses living on and inside the human body, ), and like the bacteria inside you (in the trillions) most of them are not deadly but rather essential to how you operate. That is a subject, symbiosis, for another time however.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

One would hope that with these better understandings it would behoove everyone to dispense with claims that any virus has been “eradicated”. And certainly refrain from stating it was due to a Vaccine. I’m reminded of a most recent Major news outlet article on the subject of the latest Malaria Cases in Florida and Texas. The article mentioned Malaria was certified as “eradicated” in the United States in 1970. The article also mentioned that there are around 2000 cases of Malaria in the US each year. ?? And of course the article heading spoke to the most recent cases – and those by folks who did not travel outside the country.

Timing, historically, has also been awkward with claims of ending a pandemic or eradicating a virus.

In great Britain, during the late 1700s and mid 1800s, there were plenty of diseases that came and went, before they either rolled out a vaccine or if there was no vaccine at all. Even with smallpox, as many who were vaccinated were still dying, many in the Medical profession began to seriously question the efficacy of vaccines.

As one person who studies the history of vaccines stated “There was one public rebellion in Leicester England in 1885 that resulted in them largely stopping vaccination – which in a nutshell worked quite well for them with lower and lower smallpox deaths for the next 60 years”.

We saw with Polio, Jonas Salk was a potential candidate to win a Nobel Prize for seemingly ending the polio pandemic. However, if you do the real time line study (all you fact checkers out there), the height of the Polio epidemic in America was in the year 1952. After that, like every other pandemic in the history of man, pre and post vaccines, it began to wane, numbers of deaths began to decrease.

The drug was not approved, not rolled out, until April 1955, 3 years after it peaked and death numbers started to decline. As well, the medical community was getting a better handle on treatment of patients, along with masking and early forms of “lockdown”. So now, the pandemic/epidemic was on the back end of its “presence”, and we introduced a vaccine and as the years progressed the numbers continued to drop – and the science and media community said it was due to the Vaccine.

With covid, in the spring of 2020, March, April, May, New York City saw a surge of covid infections, the most anywhere in the country/world with death rates as much as 100 to 200 a day. This was also the peak of covid deaths in New York. At that time NYC actually had to set up “Pop up Morgues”. The City had large Freezer trucks in the streets to house the dead because the regular morgues were over filled. Even the Great Central Park in Manhattan had a section used as a triage center and Morgue. It was that bad, some horror movie type stuff.

By June of that same year, while the number of covid infections continued to greatly increase, the number of daily covid deaths, at one point, was Zero. It dropped to Zero – that was the daily newspaper headline “Zero Deaths”. And this was all before we had the covid vaccines (including the mRNA ones).

What had happened was… the NYC medical community was able, after the initial enormous surge of patients (never seen before), and the confusion and hysteria of not knowing what covid was, all it’s symptoms etc., things began to settle down over time and the doctors and nurses had a greater understanding of how to deal with “covid patients”.

****

Earlier I posed the question – ‘How do we know if it was the vaccine or the immune system that saved any life?’ – I will add a 3rd factor: How do we know if it was the Immune system, the vaccine, or the care of the medical staff at our hospitals that save virally or bacterially infected lives? Some will argue it was all three, but as I showed you (he said with a smirk), vaccines don’t work, can’t work – that memory cell thing again, combined with no real virus in the vaccine.

And yes, lockdowns, masks, as much as those politically minded many are vehemently prone to disagree, did help to mitigate the spread of covid – including sanitizing.

Masks and lockdowns (or some form of quarantining) are not new to containing the spread of germs, we’ve been doing that for thousands of years – so many forget this. Like an umbrella or your condom, if your mask doesn’t work – get a better one. If one still gets infected, because of the mask or not, we don’t exist isolated in a space station, then hope the immune system does what it can to protect you.

It is always about the immune system. There once was a quasi-campaign slogan that read “it’s the economy stupid” – I will modify that for medical science purposes and say, “it’s the immune system dummy”. 2nd, is the post infection treatment by your nurses and doctors, managing uncomfortable symptoms and helping you rest and better allowing your immune system to fight and defeat the pathogen.

We see this post-infection treatment dynamic a lot with rabies where they give you the vaccine after you’ve been infected, to help you not die. ?? More on that in a bit. Rabies could be the true poster child for making claims that vaccines work – but upon closer inspection, here too, not really. Rabies, to all in the medical world, is perceived as certain death, almost like an ovarian cancer diagnosis used to be deemed ‘just a matter of months…”.

Rabies goes back thousands of years, one of the oldest diseases in history, long before vaccines. And of course medical science, true to form, will tell you that rabies deaths have decreased solely due to vaccines. Never mind that most of us now, since 1885, know about rabies. We learn this as a child, and we know to stay away from many dogs, wild animals, raccoons, Bats etc. because of rabies, fear of getting bitten and infected with rabies, and dying. Avoiding rabid animals is the real protection, and the real reason there aren’t so many deaths.

And with the first rabies vaccines as I alluded to, here too a sort of sleight of hand heralded in the widespread use of the vaccine. The Rabies Vaccine was created by Louis Pasteur. Pasture took some real strains of the virus and processed them until they were way less virulent. He then tested on dogs.

Then he gave the first human shot to a young boy whose body was infected with Rabies, and then booster shots and the boy eventually recovered. Pasture then proceeded to treat another child who was also infected, and saved that child's life. He went on to treat over 350 patients from all over Europe, Russia and America.

So, asking for a friend, or 8 billion friends, what is wrong with this picture? The first thing to note here, they were all already infected. There was no mention of this vaccine being used as a preventive measure but rather as a treatment post infection. So again, was it the vaccine, or the immune strength of the individual, accompanied by nursing care?

But still, if a vaccine can be given post infection, why is that not being done today to save lives of those infected with rabies, or any viral/bacterial infection? Today, hundreds of years since Pasture saved the lives of over 300 who were already infected, we have it that we can’t really treat rabies, once you’re infected you are going to die. Even the CDC will tell you there is no single effective treatment for rabies once clinical signs are evident.

But as the Center for Disease Control says there is no effective treatment, that rabies is a death knell, they also speak to Postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) as a way to treat a patient infected with rabies. (PEP) consists of a dose of human rabies immune globulin (HRIG) and rabies vaccine given on the day of the rabies exposure, and then a dose of vaccine given again on days 3, 7, and 14.

The CDC states “For people who have never been vaccinated against rabies previously, post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) should always include administration of both HRIG and rabies vaccine. The combination of HRIG and vaccine is recommended for both bite and non-bite exposures, regardless of the interval between exposure and initiation of treatment. People who have been previously vaccinated or are receiving pre-exposure vaccination for rabies should receive only vaccine.”

So, is there a cure for Rabies or not? Mount Sinai Org says “There is no known treatment for people with symptoms of a rabies infection. It is nearly always a fatal illness”. They go on to say – “Once the symptoms appear, the person rarely survives the disease, even with treatment.”

Yet they too go on about how to treat an infected patient. Are they treating them back to good health, or just some kind of Hospice dynamic until the patient dies?

Mount Sinai states – “If there is any risk of rabies, you will be given a series of a preventive vaccine.” So again, I ask, how does this work? Which came first, the chicken or the egg keeps popping up in my head. How are you naturally infected with some virus, and then post infection you can take a Preventive drug/vaccine to cure you?

The scientific answer to this is – a rabies infection can take a very long time to set up, for symptoms to appear and take hold in your body, so there is good enough time to initiate a vaccine protocol. This explanation blows Louis pasteur out of the water. All his patients were obviously infected and with symptoms. We didn’t have the means of communication nor transportation 200 years ago for Pasture to learn about these patients and then meet up with them prior to the disease and its manifestations setting in.

Today’s science understands that a rabies infection, it’s Incubation, the period defined as the first day you were bit, infected, to the first onset of symptoms can range from days to years. Pasture did not know this, yet all of his 250 plus infected patients were saved by his vaccine. ??

But moreso, if Rabies can take X amount of time, why wouldn’t a vaccine to match also take this amount of time to build an immune response. With Pasteurs ‘primitive’ vaccine, or the current advanced vaccines for rabies, how do we get past this idea of memory cells, immune responses to a virus? How are we saying real rabies could take a month to set up, but this vaccine works right away? And it works so much so that all of the Pasteur patients recovered fully, or even partially (they did not die).

And again, today, 2025 every reputable medical source says there is not a cure for rabies. This is not a laughing matter but it almost seems comical to say, “You’re going to die no matter what we do, but take these vaccines anyway”. ???

One quick side note. There is the idea that after being bitten, we should immediately wash the bite region so as to better prevent the viral particles from making their way to the brain (via blood, nerves?). ??

Also not funny but I’m guessing Louis Pasteur had no one to “peer review” his work, there were no governing bodies up to the task of scrutinizing his work and findings. Similar to that other fellow with the smallpox/cowpox vaccine 2 centuries ago. I’m just saying, the degree of challenge back then was minimal.

But if we speak to reality and that thing called the immune system, yes, rabies is a son of a bitch, with the greatest track record for killing humans. However, reality tells us that people have survived full on rabies, some did with treatments, and some survived without any of the known protocol treatments. Reality has shown, the deep dive stuff that many in research don’t do, that people not at all vaccinated have still got rabies, and some have died and some have survived.

Reality has also told us that some that did get vaccinated have also, post vaccination, got bit, got infected, and died from complications due to rabies. There are also instances where someone who was vaccinated and still got rabies and died, the science community employed the idea of comorbidity. Yes, this current pandemic is not the first time science has felt a need to explain away some or many vaxxed deaths.

One huge part of the narrative with this current pandemic was “comorbidity”. Another word that has popped up during this pandemic and it is somewhat misleading or misdirecting – “Immunocompromised”. The medical science community presents that word, that condition, as unique, rare perhaps. But the fact of the matter is - All humans, all 8 billion of us are, to one extent or another, Immunocompromised. We all fit onto the broadest spectrum that is immune strength or weakness. Getting a cold is your immune system being compromised just as a malignant tumor is your immune system being compromised. Some of this, if not most, is just a matter of genetics, the stuff of ancestry.

Genetics aside, with being Immunocompromised or especially with having pre-existing medical issues, this can get quite muddy (that confusion thing again). Existing health issues, most times comes with drugs (your average Heart patient takes 5 different drugs) – and all drugs “lower or weaken your ability to fight infections”. All ads for prescription drugs, along with a hefty list of side effects, say “can lower your ability to fight infection” – which is code for ‘it will weaken your immune system’.

There is actually an ad running now for a vaccine. In the small print or fast talk section of the commercial they say “works best if you have a strong immune system…”

So, thanks to my medications and the vaccine itself, my immune system is more challenged, more compromised, and along comes a deadly virus. The only true question again is – can your immune system overcome this virus? Sometimes yes, sometimes no. This for everyone, the obese, the elderly, infants, teens, alcoholics, cocaine addicts, athletes in top shape, Dennis from Accounting – all can die from any virus, can die from Polio, can die from covid, can die from the Spanish flu and no vaccine has ever prevented these things from happening.

In the Time of Cholera, or even 100 years ago with the Spanish flu and the more recent polio outbreak it bears repeating, we did not have social media. Today, we all don’t have to gather around the one radio in our home and listen to the one or two only broadcasts speaking to the Polio pandemic and then assuming what we heard was fact and thus took it as gospel and act according to what they told us – without question, without challenge (heck, back then ads told us cigarettes were good for you…).

As a famous rapper once said – “The streets is watching”. We the lay folk, what we are witnessing now with Lady Corona, is so much confusion, convolutedness, lies, retracted statements, admissions of incorrect data and info etc. And this is all from the experts, the actual scientists, biologists, virologists, epidemiologists, chemists, doctors etc. – and even the major drug companies have had to do press conferences revealing how they dropped the ball on so much of this. And the same with the leading health orgs and governing bodies like the FDA and CDC and the WORLD HEALTH ORG.

The major news outlets, all with their expert medical staff, the resident doctor or scientist etc. are equally all over the place. In fairness to them however, they are strictly getting their cues from the FDA and the CDC – who get their cues from the drug manufacturers. But only in partial fairness: At some point these news outlets need to do a better job of providing a broader palette of understandings, from the wide number of varying medical science views.

As a news outfit, a journalistic entity, you can’t say you are “fair and balanced” if you are only getting your pandemic information from 1 or 2 sources (and the CDC and FDA are basically the same source) – especially if those sources are getting their cues from the makers of the vaccines. How is that objective reporting? You don’t have to commit to what the wide range of science, the independent scientists and labs say, but you can still speak to some of it.

And sure, if you must, add your disclaimers saying we the network do not share or represent the views expressed here – or something like that… But no matter, today, many more of us regular folk are not tuned into the 6 or 11 O’clock news. No, we are, at all hours of the day, getting data and info about this pandemic from countless sources.

The “dumb” gullible masses are now more informed than ever before. We now have opposing science views and takes from other doctors and scientists and again, the narrative is no longer homogenous, no longer singular… And we all can now compare and contrast between what the news tells us and what we see in real time.

But all of this can really mean not much, because still, so few know how the body works. As I said earlier, both in and out of science, those who make vaccines etc., so few know how the body works, in particular the immune system. While we do have opposition that says the vaccines don’t work, or they are doing so much harm, or both, there is no real molecular or cellular proof to much of this. We have some studies that show for sudden deaths but there is no real proof for cause of death due to the vaccines, just as there is no real proof of vaccine efficacy and effectiveness.

I will briefly offer that there is potential harm when being injected with Sodium and Potassium chloride – especially issues with your heart. Potassium Chloride (different from Potassium Citrate in bananas) and sodium are used in many vaccines as the preservative component, especially with the fragile, needing to be refrigerated mRNA vaccines.

When they give prisoners on death row a lethal injection, included in the protocol of drugs administered is Potassium Chloride – to stop the heart. Let me repeat that: the first in a series of injections is potassium Chloride, to stop the heart, and the other injections finish off the person. As well, sadly, some who have committed suicide, did so using potassium chloride.

The vaccine makers would counter that the amount of potassium added to the mixture is very small, “negligible” and very different from the amount administered to those on death row. The FDA list some things as Generally Regarded as Safe (GRAS) but this is misleading on several fronts starting with ‘generally regarded as safe’ is not the same as safe.

Science has a term “LD50” which means Lethal Dose - is the amount of an ingested substance that kills 50 percent of a test sample. From this is borne the idea that it’s the dose that counts or matters, “it’s the dose that is the poison”.

Wrong, it’s the way any single person will react to any amount. No two people are alike (immune system spectrum once again). We hopefully have learned this with allergies. One person can eat an entire peanut butter and jelly sandwich and be fine, off they go to soccer practice, while to another person, just a whiff, the scent of a peanut, can cause serious harm even possible death. This is the case also with dairy and other food and non-food products (perfumes and air fresheners for example), so let’s all stop with the negligible amounts narrative.

Some of you might recall the “Angel of Death” nurse – Orville Lynn Majors – he used Potassium Chloride to kill those people. Granted, he used a ton of Potassium to really make sure they died, but still. Potassium Chloride has also been part of the Euthanizing protocols with animals.

Potassium Chloride is now unfortunately added to so many foods, all packaged and canned or jarred foods etc. So we are getting way too much of this in us. And while digestive dynamics and drinking lots of water can help with this lethal mineral added to our foods – having it along with sodium pumped directly into our flesh, our veins is a whole other crap shoot – we have upped the risk factor. Speak to your doctor about your heart and this potassium issue when you are getting vaccinated.

But it’s not just sodium and potassium in the syringe, these vaccines have multiples of chemicals put into them, any one of them on their own can do damage let alone combined. Graphene oxide (which is in the vaccine) induces cell toxicity through plasma membrane damage - can lead to severe effects like thrombogenicity (blood clotting). Science will again play all these ingredients (averaging a dozen for each vaccine), but each on it’s own can be problematic.

As I mentioned already any and all drugs have side effects from liver disease to causing heart and kidney failure, to increasing blood pressure, messing with our key glands, thyroid and pituitary – and can lead to diabetes and insulin resistance etc. So vaccines, technically a drug, can do damage to humans while not preventing anything. All risk and no reward.

As for autism… I could do the work and find myriad pathways from the many ingredients in vaccines to autism. I have not done that work yet - this article is already too long… Suffice it to say, it is derelict to say vaccines don’t cause autism - if you don’t know what does cause autism. And the “genetics” argument falls way short because myriad external factors (drugs) can alter genetics (any deep dive will reveal that drugs can directly influence changes in gene expression in areas of the brain and elsewhere).

So too with Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) - there is the debate about the role vaccines might play in this (with the pro vaxx community saying there is zero connection). Here is what 5 minutes of research reveals: Sodium Chloride can lead to health problems like high blood pressure, heart disease, and kidney disease; Seizures, osteomalacia, and encephalopathy as a result of aluminum hydroxide

Ingestion of aluminum phosphide can be fatal. While sodium aluminum phosphate is generally considered safe in food products, it can still cause adverse effects in certain individuals. Yeast proteins can cause an allergic reaction potentially leading to more serious symptoms like difficulty breathing.

I just sifted out the dangers of some of the ingredients in a vaccine given to a 2 month old. Any single ingredient can be problematic, yet there are at least half dozen ingredients of concern in all vaccines. And at 2 months old, a human's immune system is not fully developed, they are weaker, more susceptible to these toxins.

So, that's half a dozen ingredients in one vaccine - and 8, EIGHT, different vaccines are given to humans at 2 months old. How dare anyone say there is zero harm in these vaccines!!!

@@@@@@@@@@@@@

I, like so many, especially here in America, grew up taking whatever vaccines they told us to take. It is now the norm, part of the American way of life to have everyone take vaccines. This has now worked its way down to giving newborns vaccines. Giving Vaccines to babies for things they have no way of really getting at such a young age (Hepatitis B for example). With tetanus, when ever have millions of babies, kids, teens, adults died from it? Never. Whether a vaccine works or not (I’m telling you they do not) – we all know they come with consequences, some subtle and more nuanced (hard to gauge) like a weakened immune system and some that directly damage your liver.

No drug, in the history of drugs, has been without some side effects, including the basic aspirin. Even Ivermectin, which has never been visually proven to work on a cellular, molecular level - is fraught with deleterious side effects (That NO ONE bothers to mention). All drugs challenge the immune system’s ability to fight, ward off, and defeat so many things, other things not related to the vaccine or the prescribed drug. To have infants, babies, newborns, children take a barrage of vaccines greatly diminishes the chances of the human having a strong and robust immune system going forward.

And with our children’s schools, the pharmaceutical industries have essentially normalized taking drugs to “help” kids with ADHD, hyperactivity and the like.

The industry that makes these debilitating drugs and the medical practitioners (your doctor or shrink) wants you to take so so many all at once. So many preventive drugs pumped into your veins is also okay with the FDA, the CDC, NIH, the World Health Organization et al. It appears we now have a global medical system, one that is, to quote one Anthony Starks, comfortable with zero accountability.

As for the HPV Vaccine (Human papillomavirus), teenage girls do not need to take drugs to prevent them from getting cervical cancer. For one, it doesn’t prevent cervical cancer – like seriously how would that work? It’s cancer. Did they give the drug to 10 girls and ten girls they gave a placebo to, waited 12 years and it turned out that the ten placebo girls got cervical cancer and the other ten were spared now due to this drug…

As vaccines do not work, not at all, they certainly do not work to prevent cancer. I am sure the drug industry concocted some pathway narrative to show how teenage girls can or “will” get cancer, a form of scare tactics if you will, but it is founded in no real science, nor any real patterns in history to which to draw on or from. Billions (with a B) of females around the world have grown up and do not have cervical cancer. Not any time in recorded medical history have even ¼ of all teenage girls grown up to have cervical cancer.

And now, they are suggesting we give our young sons this same vaccine. ?? But to be sure, pumping these girls and boys up with vaccines at this young age, or any age, will weaken their immune systems making it easier now for cells to go rogue. Cancer cells don’t like strong and hardy immune systems.

THE LOGISTICAL IMPOSSIBILITY OF ENDING A PANDEMIC

WITH A VACCINE.

Aside from the fact that it’s an impossibility of physics, chemistry and biology for vaccines to work – let’s indulge and say there was a remote Island nation, somewhere in the south pacific perhaps, one with a population of 120,000 humans. Suddenly a deadly virus is afoot and people are starting to die from it. The government and its medical science experts immediately react and respond by beginning to develop a vaccine – in tandem with shutting down all methods of leaving or entering the country (the island). Masks, sanitizers, etc. are handed out and various quarantine and lockdown protocols are put in place.

Now, 8 months in 12,000 have been infected and 1,000 have died from being infected. 15 months in we have a vaccine and it is being injected into the arms of all 120,000 of the citizens (minus the 1,000 that died). Now we are at 2 years and the number of infections and deaths are going down, all those who were infected have been sent to one isolated part of the island to ride it out. By the 3rd year, the pandemic is over, no more deaths and no more infections.

At this point the leaders of this country, along with the medical science community have rightly claimed that they not only flattened a curve but they have completely eradicated the virus and ended, fully, the pandemic. All the citizens were checked and no one on the island has the virus in their bloods so there is zero chance of spreading and thus we are done with this plague.

All of that obviously is a made up scenario. In real time, in real life, no country, the world, has never ever been able to be “done with a plague”. At no time in the history of vaccines, has all humans been given the vaccine. We can start there. With smallpox, with polio, and today with covid, not all humans took the vaccine. Even with mandates, soft or mild, during polio or covid were we able to inject all living beings with the vaccine.

And equal to that, at no time in medical history did we ever check everyone, as in EVERYONE (100% of population), if they were infected. Never in modern history were those infected, made to be quarantined. Yes, if you were infected, on your own you stayed home. Or you didn’t, and no one knew who was walking around with the virus or not.

A virologist once said "Eradication means you have to get to whatever disease you're targeting, everywhere, wherever it exists"

Medical science has it that we eradicated Smallpox - save for laboratory samples in two high-security facilities: one in Russia and one in the United States. These samples are stored for research and surveillance purposes.

Here’s the thing: you Can’t eradicate a virus, it’s a logistical impossibility as I described already. If eradication means you have to get to whatever disease you're targeting, everywhere, wherever it exists, then that never happened. Smallpox is the go to claim for eradication and a vaccine's ultimate success - but we never did all the things you need to do in order to eradicate a virus.

Some argue, why is it then that there are no longer any cases, worldwide, of smallpox. I argue back - how do we know, how do we truly know? If only a small percentage of people infected with smallpox die from it, or express extreme symptoms, then that leaves the majority of people with smallpox, the asymptomatic ones, walking the earth, still.

And even people who are sick and have symptoms quite akin to smallpox, do they all go to the doctor to get tested? No, so few do. Most people just think they have the flu, a flu, a flu virus, or something and they do what we all do, lay up in bed, treat said symptoms and ride it out.

It is rare that we are very sick and go get a blood test. Perhaps now with covid we are more likely to get a test to see if our sickness is covid, but 6 years ago we rode it out, in the early 2000s we rode it out, in the 90s, 80s etc - we rode the sickness out. As well, when someone died from the sickness, be it flu, or whatever, did any coroner's office do a blood test to check for smallpox?

Also, viruses, including the Genus that is Orthopoxvirus, morph. Smallpox doesn’t mutate as fast as covid, not nearly, but it still has variants, even the family of this type of virus has variants - and variants begat more variants begat more variants - and as we have learned, variants can go two ways, more deadly, or milder. And while the gene type for small pox is still smallpox, who among us has been tested for smallpox? Who among us has been tested for antibodies that were vaccinated for smallpox?

If 100 people had smallpox, the deadly strain of the 2 - 70 would not die. If 100 people had the less deadly strain the mortality rate would be between 1 and 2 percent. Around 7 percent of all deaths require an autopsy. Autopsies are typically conducted when there's suspicion of foul play. But when someone is just very sick and they die we are never testing for measles or smallpox or anything.

Smallpox should never be labeled as eradicated - unless 8 billion people are tested for it and its potential variants and we came up with 8 billion negative tests for smallpox.

For those who still believe we have memory cells - It's important to note that the smallpox vaccine does not contain the smallpox virus itself, not in Jenners days and not today. Apples to Oranges.

The history timeline for Smallpox can show you that the virus, just like all others, comes and goes. In most instances the time between outbreaks is 100 years, in some instances 300 years.

It’s only been 47 years since the last outbreak.

As well, for most of history with many pandemics, sanitary dynamics played a huge role in the spread of the virus and the dying of people. Today, we are far more fastidious about cleaning and sanitizing, washing and bathing, distancing and masking. We are also more aware of preventive measures with germs.

It is my hope we never see a smallpox outbreak again, or polio, or covid, or cholera - but to say “eradicated” is not true.

Sidenote: The last person to die from smallpox (that we know of) in 1978, she was vaccinated. Her mother, while caring for her, contracted the disease as well. She too was vaccinated for smallpox prior to getting smallpox.

The NBA claimed success when they had their playoff season inside a “bubble”. The bubble was simply a single designated area where only the players, staff, sports media, and medical folk were allowed to enter. They were quite strict and diligent in their efforts. You couldn’t really leave the “compound/campus” if you will, or you had to wait a certain amount of time, with tests, before reentering. All were vaccinated, all were constantly checked for covid, and if you had covid you were quarantined until you no longer had covid.

So, one can see this, and use this as a great example of either lockdown effectiveness, vaccine effectiveness, testing regular and quarantine effectiveness etcetera - or all of the above. But not so fast. I live in a building with over a hundred people. There are buildings in my city with over a thousand people. And none of this bubble dynamic took place – and no one died. No sub pandemic started in my building or the hundreds of other buildings in my city.

And to be sure, not everyone in my building was vaccinated, not even remotely. So too the other buildings, not everyone was masked, sadly, not everyone stayed home, was sanitizing and on and on. Not just in my city, but this across the country and the globe.

And as I mentioned how the number of covid deaths dropped dramatically in a matter of months – before we had vaccines, so too, over all, the entire country and world, covid is now on its way out. And it bears repeating, “on its way out” just means morphing into perhaps a less deadly or more deadly form of the original covid – which as I have stated, is not really original.

So, once again, there will be the claim that the vaccines worked for covid 19, that they saved millions of lives, and that as a direct result of these vaccines, we have essentially ended the covid pandemic – and we can all go home now, nothing to see here…

And no one will really challenge this. No one will ask the CDC and FDA did we check to see if everyone was vaccinated (rhetorically, because we know so many are not vaccinated). No one will ask the CDC/FDA did we check to make sure no one, at least here in America, all 330 million of us, did not have, still, the covid virus in them – again, impossible to do and thus did not happen. The island scenario I put forth, along with the actual NBA bubble, none of that was done anywhere else in this country or around the world – so how in god’s name has the vaccine saved millions, how in anyone’s name did the vaccine end the covid pandemic?

In addition to the smallpox claim for vaccine effectiveness, the Measles is one people present to me as “proof”. They say “how come I don’t get the measles as an adult, now that I took the shot as a child?”. The answer is simple - an adult has a stronger immune system than a baby, infant or child does. So if you never were inoculated as a child or at anytime, then as an adult, if you got the measles, it would not greatly impact you, the chances of death are almost non existent - unless you have a weak immune system then it won’t seem like just a cold, more like a flu or deadly flu.

A newborn's immune system is underdeveloped and matures during the first 7-8 years of life, but the immune system continues to evolve and strengthen throughout life. So the idea is that we help the child's immune system by giving them the shot so they won’t get the measles. But if we didn’t get the shot as a child, science can’t tell you they are going to die. In history there is zero precedent.

Even today, there are millions of adult humans who never got a measles vaccine, and are not impacted by measles if they get infected as children or adults. As well, these same adults, lesser in numbers, can be gravely ill or die from measles - it all depends on the immune system.

As with Smallpox, as an adult, you very well might have been infected with measles - but you didn’t know it, and were not tested for it - you just thought you had a bad cold or the flu. You thought this because again, they share 90 percent of symptoms (fever, cough, runny nose, and red, watery eyes, etc.) - and you never considered getting tested - you just rode it out.

As for infants, newborns, babies, young children - I mentioned that their immune systems are not as robust as adults, and this is more the reason they should not be given these drugs at such an early age (or any age). If/when drugs lower our ability to fight infections aka weakens our immune systems, why would we want to give so many to these young humans whose immune systems are inherently already challenged due to being new humans?

We have from 2 to a dozen or more drugs we give to babies - roughly 50 jabs are given to kids before they reach adulthood, or have full and robust immune systems. How in God and Mother Nature's name are our kids supposed to develop strong, hardy and robust immune systems when given so many drugs - drugs that weaken the immune system?????

Are we not paying attention to the growing number of children's hospitals for one illness or another? Do we not acknowledge the increased rates of children with Leukemia and myriad other diseases? We are not helping our children, we are hurting them.

And now we have vaccines for the fetus. Pfizer's ABRYSVO, is given to the pregnant mom (32 to 36 weeks), so the drugs, those chemicals, can make their way to/through the placenta to reach the yet to be born human…

As crass as this sounds, many reading this will outright call fraud, they will outright say this is all crap, BS, that vaccines work and they have been proven time and again to work – to them I say if you really, truly believe vaccines work, get a rabies vaccine, and then get bit by a rabid animal. Suicide is not a crime in the United States and only some states have attempted suicide listed as a crime in their criminal statutes.

So find a state that it’s wholly legal and have at it. Film it for us and show the world you can no longer die from rabies due to your vaccination. And for those who cry “I am naturally immune”, also get bit by a rabid animal and keep us posted to see how that worked out.

Now, I say these last two paragraphs in frustration, but for those who call fraud, who insist we do have memory cells, and the vaccine practice, which is wholly based on this cell memory dynamic, I say - show us your antibodies.

If you think you (we collectively) have antibodies that, in the case of measles, due to the vaccine you had as a child - show us your antibodies for Measles. Show us in your blood, in your tissues, bone marrow, wherever, Killer T cells, white blood cells, B cells, antibodies that are specific to Measles - or to any vaccine you ever took - with the exception of a vaccine given to you last week…

Prove it. Prove you have these antibodies in you. All these children who are given vaccines for HPV, or chicken pox, or any of the dozens of different types of vaccines we give children, show us the antibodies. These children are all grown up now, show us their antibodies. Prove that these vaccines provide long lasting or even lifetime protection.

And then, once you get the report back from your doctor, take it to a medical science lab near you and have the antibodies be compared to the antibodies of someone actually infected by the live virus or bacteria.

And don’t anyone tell me that is hard to do, that it’s a logistical nightmare or impossibility. I challenge all vaccine makers to test any adult and show us the antibodies from vaccines you gave them 25 years ago when you vaccinated them as children. Show us the CD8-T cells marked for Measles (actual measles not what was in the vaccine).

This test is legal to do. Then, once this test is done - do the critical test of showing how those cells and antibodies react. How they react to a live virus, or even a modified one. It’s one thing to hopefully find, single out antibodies specific to measles (or the measles vaccine), but to see it fight the actual pathogen again, many years later - that is the real deal proof!

In the second paragraph of this article I said I was not the only one who questioned the idea/theory of memory cells. Long or short lasting. In fact, there are several pockets of scientists who have questions about the veracity of real memory cells.

There are for sure many pockets of vaccine science where they question the idea of memory cells- and proceed to test to see if this is true. The problem with all of those studies is that they are once again barking up the wrong trees, the same wrong trees. They only test to see if antibodies hang around. Not one of these studies done by those “curious” about memory cells, tests to see if the white blood cell or antibody reacts to the same or even similar pathogen reintroduced to the body. That is the point of saying something is a “memory cell”. Not that it can hang around, but hang around and spot the same antigen it battles years ago, and engage it win or lose.

It’s wholly convenient that we are not allowed to expose humans to actual deadly pathogens, but science should be clever enough to duplicate this dynamic in a lab. Where is the study proving memory cells hang around and become very active (proactive) once the pathogen returns.

What could be a legal and or “safe” test is, give an adult the measles vaccine and observe to see if the old antibodies (assuming you found them) rise up to interact with the new shot of measles.

The drug makers, (beyond waivers and side effects), don’t really have to prove it works, or, better, they are not responsible for you if you do take their non-working vaccine and you still get infected, and you still die.

I will remind the layperson who is still asking ‘how could doctors and scientists be wrong’, that science historically gets stuff wrong – all the time, errors are made, some corrected, many not and just overlooked. Any good and in depth study of any industry (politics, religion, education, military, health, legal, medical, scientific, agricultural, urban and rural developing, etc.) should reveal that none of them are without flaws, without crimes and injustices, without complicit dynamics, veiled codes of silence, without mistakes and accidents, without corruption, agendas and monetary motivations and so on and so forth.

We like to say we have checks and balances everywhere, but we actually don’t – or, the checks and balances are also fraught with flaws…and we as a whole, society en mass, are, for lack of a better word, clueless as to knowing where truth and facts really are – if there are any to begin with.

In addition to accidental or innocent errors, History has also seen its share of skullduggery in the world of peer review, well predating even the Tesla/Edison Feuds. And there, along with ego, money was part of the equation. Today, peer review of anything is a mockery, a travesty and a sham - and in most instances, a money grab.

I would personally hope a place for the control of diseases as is the CDC (it’s in their name) and the FDA who has its origins as a federal consumer protection agency, that these agencies would be a place that provided the broadest scope for understanding so much about diseases and cures and preventions – and side effects and deaths. I would hope organizations like these would be the go to place where full disclosure was always on tap. And sadly they are not.

And I don’t really care that the CDC and the FDA are partnered with, funded in part by, major pharmaceutical companies, which many would see as a huge conflict of interest. I’m still vastly more concerned with the full breadth and scope of honesty and forthrightness that is lacking with these not for profit organizations. I can see how politics can be a hot mess and all over the place and most times the side you come down on with any issue is the side your party favors, but I would like to think that these entities created to serve the American public would provide full disclosure so that all citizens could be just as informed as they are.

I don’t want to be told by the CDC/FDA or anyone that 20,000 people took the vaccine and 20,000 didn’t – and the latter got covid. That is all kinds of fraught with flaws. Just as clinical trials with human testimonies are also suspect. When drug companies say their vaccine is 50, 65 or even 90 percent effective – that is the same percentage of people who got covid and survived without the vaccine or treatment.

But to the point of this bit of writing – it is better to be safe than sorry and it is better to be truly more informed, fully informed about these vaccines as opposed to blind faith. Blind faith, believing we will now put an end to covid or I will now not get covid 19 because I had the vaccine – is not a slippery slope but rather the most dangerous hill – a hill not worth dying on. Always be diligent when there is a known virus afoot.

I’m reminded of this TV Mini Series out of Korea about a horse doctor who became a doctor for humans. At one point in the series some virus started to spread throughout the village. The doctor and others immediately, almost instinctively, began to rip sections from their clothes and mask themselves with the fabric. Those who were already infected were immediately quarantined while being treated. The virus eventually came, killed some, and went away.

This show was written over a decade prior to the Coronavirus pandemic. The writers knew that the hint of a deadly virus going round one should immediately cover their nose and mouth.

A recent podcast host asked someone from the medical science community - "What should I do if I don't want to get a cold? The answer was "stay away from people, all the time…"

Masking, keeping your distance, sanitizing and taking immediate measures is how you deal with a virus. Just like the many images we see of the Spanish Flu of 1918, they all were wearing masks (mostly all). And we had no vaccines for that pandemic – and it came, killed some, and went away.

Take your vaccines and boosters if you are so inclined but don’t ever think you are now immune and can continue on without levels of protection and other protocols.

For one, you can’t prove you are immune, nor can any doctor. They can’t tell you your new antibodies are a match for atmospheric covid - because again, atmospheric covid was not injected into your body.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

In conclusion:

The way I was raised was to question all things. It was not just trusting everything. Never that. To just “trust the Science” is the most anti science statement ever – questioning and challenging science is how you do science.

I recently had a discussion with someone on social media about memory cells. She kept providing me with links to peer reviewed published papers - as I continually asked for actual visual footage of memory cells doing the memory thing. She finally said to me “I based my comments on what I studied and a lot of scientific evidence (writings)…”.

I replied - when visual proof is not at the top of the evidence pile, or not included at all, then assumptions, conjecture etc. can and do rule the day and it’s the wild wild west for proof and thus anything goes.

Everyone I speak to, be they virologists, epidemiologists, biologists, chemists, vaccine developers, immunologists - or jack and jill from lansing Michigan, they all fall short when I ask for visual proof of memory cells in action. And I am sure they Never considered visual proof. To be sure all of these fine folks just went with the many written narratives on the subject.

Equally, all of them were eventually reduced once again to saying “visual proof isn’t everything”. I’m sure some of them tried to google “live footage of memory cells in action” and came up short, landing only on sites that have CGI explanations of how the immune system works. This is when they looked to other means of proof and evidence, all of them ignoring the reality that not one science lab on this planet is sans a microscope. The microscope, including the ones in every grade school, middle school, high school and college - are for us to see what the naked eye can’t see. Microscopes exist for us to better understand things, based on visual proof.

As I stated earlier, visual proof is everything, it is key to doing away with conjecture, assumptions, extrapolations based on degrees of plausibility etc. - and doing away with Data, data that is many times dubious. Visual proof should always win the day. You can’t stand there in your lab, surrounded by million dollar electron microscopes and state that visual proof isn’t everything, or downplay it in any way shape or form.

And the greater insult is when they can’t provide visual proof, they continue to wax expert, in hyper detail, about what they know B Lymphocytes can do and how they work. When I ask them how do they know all these intricate nuanced inner body, inter and intracellular workings, they clam up - because they know that the only way to know these things is to see them. It’s the only way - unless they are all just guessing.

But does no one find it odd? You are all educated, science backgrounds or not, do you not find it odd, curious, that there exists no visual proof of this memory cell dynamic? These uber expensive microscopes (the instruments can cost $75,000 - $10,000,000) have the ability to record what cells do - we have tons of footage for myriad cell goings on - but not one to match what these computer generated videos show and tell us B cells do.

Be a real scientist and ask why this is. Be a real scientist and don’t be scared to rethink what you thought you knew about the immune system. Science is supposed to be ‘Not Static’ - but collectively so many are stuck, fully entrenched in the past - a most questionable past regarding the world of inoculation. We have once again constructed a tower with an erroneous foundation.

However one feels, no one should be bullied, mocked, harmed, for how they feel. If you trust the science, if you believe in drugs and vaccines, if you believe in the FDA, the CDC and WHO, etc. even Pfizer, it is your right and no one should cast aspersions on you. So too those who are not so keen on science being put into their veins, they should be allowed to feel the way they feel sans consequence from others who are not of like mind.

And stop labeling those who demand to know more, who don’t trust big pharma or news outlets – as “anti-vaxxer”. Label them instead as decent folk who want the best for themselves and their loved ones, for their elderly and their children, just as you do.

And to that, this is where there is a silver lining for vaccine makers. I recently saw a video that read “Do vaccines make us healthier or sicker over time?” In the comments section, someone said and I quote: “if this video goes viral, many MD & pharma will lose trillion$ ”. End quote.

I say, not so fast. What these drug companies have going for them, always, is percentages. If what I know and have expressed in this article is known by a few others (and it will only be a few), combined with those who see that video, even if it goes viral, along with those growing numbers of internet folk who are “anti vaxxers” – that number, totaled, still adds up to squat. Squat as compared to the overwhelming number of humans who will still always put their faith and bodies in science, the medical community, the FDA, CDC and the Media who are the go between twixt the FDA/CDC/Pharma and the masses.

If less than .0001 percent say big pharma is bad and only in it for the money, making crap drugs, ineffective medicines, harmful drugs and vaccines – that adds up to about $14,000 US dollars lost annually (I made those numbers up…). For Pharmaceutical companies to have the backing of the larger share of the world community which can total 99.9999 percent of humans – that adds up to trillions of dollars (I didn’t make those numbers up).

The anti drug/vaccine mouse can roar as loud as it wants, it’s still a mouse and no one can really hear it.

I, not any major news outlet, can remind folk that some of these companies have been sued for actual fraud (fraud is actually the word used on the court documents) for billions, and lost – and that still will not move the needle for those who are all in believers, trustors of science and science folk. The needle doesn’t budge when I tell folk that one of the companies that made a vaccine, never made a successful vaccine in their entire time as a company. They tried, but each time they failed, the FDA did not approve them, until now.

I can also tell you that one of those companies made a covid vaccine that rendered all manner of side effects, some lethal – to the extent that two dozen European countries have suspended the use of this vaccine maker's product.

All true, all facts, everything can be fact checked – but it will not put a dent in the money made from vaccines during this pandemic.

“Uphill battle” doesn’t even begin to describe any and all efforts to hold these companies accountable. Even losing billions in a lawsuit pales to the ever increasing war chest these drug making companies have.

And it bears repeating, not all scientists, not all medical folk are bad, they are not evil, money grabbing people. The bulk are not. Most of this systemic problem is created by just a few.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

The only way to boost your immune system is by doing nothing. Stay away from drugs and medications, eat less, way less, only drink water, destress, get in shape and stay active but with pacing.

The body needs a respite from the many things it ingests daily - this is not healthy, not sustainable, to eat the way we do, to take medications at the slightest provocations. The body will crash and burn at that rate, it will tap out. We need our immune systems to constantly fight for our lives - but we need to not get in its way.

Quick summary of key points:

Vaccines don’t work because we don’t have memory cells.

No vaccine has the real live virus or bacteria in it and thus can never

generate the proper and needed immune response.

All drugs weaken the immune system, lowering your ability to

fight infection among other things.

Take care of yourselves everyone and thanks for reading. Oliver